World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
33
Citations
3897
World Ranking
8404
National Ranking
850

Rob A. Kemp publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rob A. Kemp sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 71 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Rob A. Kemp D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rob A. Kemp sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rob A. Kemp is affiliated with Royal Holloway University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on Medicine and Psychology with particular attention to Emergency Medicine, Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Education, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their scholarly output includes three recent papers covering topics in coaching, emergency care, and health service delivery. These are:

  • 'AI coaching': democratising coaching service or offering an ersatz? (2024), published in Coaching An International Journal of Theory Research and Practice
  • The Emotional Labour of the Coach - in and out of the coaching 'room' (2022), published in DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)
  • PP31 Ambulance handover: a thematic review of delays in 2018/19 (2020), published in Emergency Medicine Journal

The research topics covered by Kemp include coaching methods and impact, psychology related to coaching and therapy, educational leadership and innovation, trauma and emergency care studies, emergency and acute care studies, as well as injury epidemiology and prevention.

  • Coaching Methods and Impact
  • Psychology, Coaching, and Therapy
  • Educational Leadership and Innovation
  • Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Injury Epidemiology and Prevention

Their frequent publication venues reflect an interdisciplinary approach involving both health care and psychological aspects:

  • Coaching An International Journal of Theory Research and Practice
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)
  • Emergency Medicine Journal

Collaborations form an integral part of their work, with frequent coauthors including:

  • Tatiana Bachkirova
  • Jaqualine Lindridge
  • Kevin Reynard
  • Richard Brownhill
  • Jerry Penn-Ashman

Rob A. Kemp's research distinctly combines the analysis of psychological and coaching frameworks with applied emergency medical studies. This interdisciplinary focus provides insights that bridge the understanding of healthcare processes, emotional labor in coaching roles, and innovation in educational leadership within health-related contexts.

Best Publications

  • Provenance, transport and characteristics of modern aeolian dust in western Gansu Province, China, and interpretation of the Quaternary loess record

    Edward Derbyshire;Edward Derbyshire;Xingmin Meng;Xingmin Meng;Rob A. Kemp

  • Pedogenic modification of loess: significance for palaeoclimatic reconstructions

    Rob A Kemp

  • A record of the Blake Event during the last interglacial paleosol in the western Loess Plateau of China

    Xiao-Min Fang;Xiao-Min Fang;Ji-Jun Li;Rob Van der Voo;Conall Mac Niocaill

  • Sand-drift and Soil Formation Along an Exposed North Atlantic Coastline: 14,000 Years of Diverse Geomorphological, Climatic and Human Impacts

    D.D. Gilbertson;D.D. Gilbertson;J.-L. Schwenninger;J.-L. Schwenninger;R.A. Kemp;R.A. Kemp;E.J. Rhodes;E.J. Rhodes

  • Isotopic constraints on the source of Argentinian loess – with implications for atmospheric circulation and the provenance of Antarctic dust during recent glacial maxima

    James Smith;Derek Vance;Rob A. Kemp;Corey Archer

  • Quantitative bulk and single-particle mineralogy of a thick Chinese loess–paleosol section: implications for loess provenance and weathering

    Gi Young Jeong;Stephen Hillier;Rob A. Kemp

  • Late Quaternary paleosols, stratigraphy and landscape evolution in the Northern Pampa, Argentina

    Rob A. Kemp;Marcelo Zárate;Phillip Toms;Matthew King

  • Micromorphology of loess–paleosol sequences: a record of paleoenvironmental change

    Rob A Kemp

  • Pedosedimentary and palaeoenvironmental significance of a Holocene alluvial sequence in the southern Pampas, Argentina:

    Marcelo Zárate;Rob A. Kemp;Marcela Espinosa;Laura Ferrero

  • Changes in mineralogy of loess–paleosol sections across the Chinese Loess Plateau

    Gi Young Jeong;Stephen Hillier;Rob A. Kemp

  • Soil Micromorphology and the Quaternary

    Steven L. Forman;R. A. Kemp

  • Variations in loess and palaeosol properties as indicators of palaeoclimatic gradients across the Loess Plateau of North China

    Edward Derbyshire;Edward Derbyshire;Rob Kemp;Xingmin Meng;Xingmin Meng

  • Role of micromorphology in paleopedological research

    Rob A. Kemp

  • Origin of the magnetic susceptibility signal in Chinese loess

    Xingmin Meng;Xingmin Meng;Edward Derbyshire;Edward Derbyshire;Rob A. Kemp

  • Pedosedimentary Reconstruction of a Thick Loess-Paleosol Sequence near Lanzhou in North-Central China

    Rob A. Kemp;Edward Derbyshire;Meng Xingmin;Chen Fahu

  • Excavations at the Lower Palaeolithic site at Elveden, Suffolk, UK

    Nick Ashton;Simon Lewis;Simon Parfitt;Ian Candy

  • Climate change, loess and palaeosols: proxy measures and resolution in North China

    Edward Derbyshire;Edward Derbyshire;Rob A. Kemp;Xingmin Meng;Xingmin Meng

  • Excavations at the Lower Palaeolithic site at East Farm, Barnham, Suffolk 1989-92

    N.M. Ashton;D.Q. Bowen;J.A. Holman;C.O. Hunt

  • The pedosedimentary evolution and chronology of Tortugas, a Late Quaternary type-site of the northern Pampa, Argentina

    R.A Kemp;P.S Toms;M King;D.M Kröhling

  • Distribution and genesis of calcitic pedofeatures within a rapidly aggrading loess-paleosol sequence in China

    R.A. Kemp

  • The Kesgrave Sands and Gravels: ‘pre-glacial’ Quaternary deposits of the River Thames in East Anglia and the Thames valley

    James Rose;Colin A. Whiteman;Peter Allen;Rob A. Kemp

Frequent Co-Authors

Edward Derbyshire
Edward Derbyshire University of Leicester
James Rose
James Rose Royal Holloway University of London
John A. Catt
John A. Catt University College London
Xiaomin Fang
Xiaomin Fang Chinese Academy of Sciences
Edward J. Rhodes
Edward J. Rhodes University of Sheffield
Simon A. Parfitt
Simon A. Parfitt University College London
Steven L. Forman
Steven L. Forman Baylor University
Ian Candy
Ian Candy Royal Holloway University of London
Chris Hunt
Chris Hunt Liverpool John Moores University
Derek Vance
Derek Vance ETH Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary career paths that combine science, technology, and communication. For those interested in expanding their expertise, exploring online degrees for seniors offers flexible options tailored to different life stages and career shifts.

Beyond pure Earth Science, degrees such as a Master of Library and Information Science are gaining attention for their role in managing scientific data and resources. Programs accredited by the ALA, like the ala mlis programs, prepare graduates for specialized careers that support research and educational access worldwide.

Considering whether is library science a good degree can help prospective students understand the value of information management skills alongside technical Earth Science knowledge. This dual expertise is increasingly important as data becomes central to environmental decision-making.

In addition, creative fields like digital imagery play a vital role in Earth Science communication. Pursuing a bachelors in photography online can empower students to visually document environmental changes, making science more accessible to wider audiences.

Best Scientists Citing Rob A. Kemp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles