World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 80 1576 1496 732 688 153 25224

Nevin D. Young publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nevin D. Young between 1982 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nevin D. Young published across 45 years, from 1982 to 2026, averaging 3.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2017. 1 of the 169 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2017. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 3 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 4 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 6 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 1 publication 2011: 3 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 0 publications 2026: 1 publication
1982 2026

169 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nevin D. Young: publications per year, 1982 to 2026
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 2
1984 2
1985 1
1986 1
1987 3
1988 1
1989 4
1990 1
1991 1
1992 6
1993 4
1994 4
1995 3
1996 7
1997 3
1998 2
1999 6
2000 3
2001 5
2002 6
2003 8
2004 8
2005 6
2006 5
2007 5
2008 8
2009 1
2010 1
2011 3
2012 5
2013 6
2014 6
2015 5
2016 3
2017 13
2018 3
2019 3
2020 6
2021 2
2022 2
2023 0
2024 3
2025 0
2026 1
Total 169
Download as CSV

Nevin D. Young publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nevin D. Young sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 145–154 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 153 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193 153
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Nevin D. Young D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nevin D. Young sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111 80
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Nevin D. Young is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a concentration on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Agronomy and Crop Science, and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior, and Systematics. Their work encompasses a range of topics centered on legume nitrogen fixing symbiosis, nematode management and characterization studies, soybean genetics and cultivation, plant molecular biology research, plant disease resistance and genetics, ruminant nutrition and digestive physiology, and botanical research and chemistry.

Recent publications by Nevin D. Young include:

  • "The genome of a wild Medicago species provides insights into the tolerant mechanisms of legume forage to environmental stress," 2021, BMC Biology
  • "Genome-wide association study and genomic selection for tolerance of soybean biomass to soybean cyst nematode infestation," 2020, PLoS ONE
  • "Combining GWAS and population genomic analyses to characterize coevolution in a legume-rhizobia symbiosis," 2022, Molecular Ecology
  • "The antagonistic MYB paralogs RH1 and RH2 govern anthocyanin leaf markings in Medicago truncatula," 2020, New Phytologist
  • "Alfalfa (Medicago sativaL.)pho2 mutant plants hyperaccumulate phosphate," 2022, G3 Genes Genomes Genetics

Nevin D. Young works frequently with a group of coauthors, among whom the most common collaborators are:

  • Andrew Farmer
  • Waltram Ravelombola
  • Ainong Shi
  • Liana Nice
  • Aaron J. Lorenz

The primary scientific venues where Nevin D. Young has published include:

  • OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • BMC Biology
  • Molecular Ecology
  • PLoS ONE
  • New Phytologist

The body of work presented by Nevin D. Young predominantly investigates aspects of legume forage tolerance to environmental stress and the genomic bases of plant-pathogen interactions in crops such as soybean and alfalfa. Their research further addresses molecular mechanisms in legume-rhizobia symbiosis and plant anthocyanin leaf markings, contributing to fields including plant molecular biology and crop science.

Best Publications

  • RFLP Mapping in Plant Breeding: New Tools for an Old Science

    S. D. Tanksley;N. D. Young;A. H. Paterson;M. W. Bonierbale

  • The roles of segmental and tandem gene duplication in the evolution of large gene families in Arabidopsis thaliana

    Steven B Cannon;Arvind Mitra;Andrew Baumgarten;Nevin D Young

  • The Medicago genome provides insight into the evolution of rhizobial symbioses

    Nevin D Young;Frédéric Debellé;Frédéric Debellé;Giles E D Oldroyd;Rene Geurts

  • Plant disease resistance genes encode members of an ancient and diverse protein family within the nucleotide‐binding superfamily

    Blake C. Meyers;Allan W. Dickerman;Richard W. Michelmore;Subramoniam Sivaramakrishnan;Subramoniam Sivaramakrishnan

  • QTL MAPPING AND QUANTITATIVE DISEASE RESISTANCE IN PLANTS

    N. D. Young

  • RFLP analysis of the size of chromosomal segments retained around the Tm-2 locus of tomato during backcross breeding.

    N. D. Young;S. D. Tanksley

  • Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Soybean

    Y. L. Zhu;Y. L. Zhu;Q. J. Song;Q. J. Song;D. L. Hyten;C. P. Van Tassell

  • Estimating genome conservation between crop and model legume species

    Hong Kyu Choi;Jeong Hwan Mun;Dong Jin Kim;Hongyan Zhu

  • Restriction fragment length polymorphism maps and the concept of graphical genotypes.

    N. D. Young;S. D. Tanksley

  • Genome Duplication in Soybean ( Glycine subgenus soja )

    R C Shoemaker;K Polzin;J Labate;J Specht

  • Use of isogenic lines and simultaneous probing to identify DNA markers tightly linked to the tm-2a gene in tomato.

    Nevin D. Young;Daniel Zamir;Martin W. Ganal;Steven D. Tanksley

  • Legumes as a model plant family. Genomics for food and feed report of the Cross-Legume Advances Through Genomics Conference.

    Paul Gepts;William D. Beavis;E. Charles Brummer;Randy C. Shoemaker

  • A cautiously optimistic vision for marker-assisted breeding.

    Nevin Dale Young

  • A soybean transcript map: gene distribution, haplotype and single-nucleotide polymorphism analysis.

    Ik Young Choi;David L. Hyten;Lakshmi K. Matukumalli;Qijian Song

  • Legume genome evolution viewed through the Medicago truncatula and Lotus japonicus genomes

    Steven B. Cannon;Lieven Sterck;Stephane Rombauts;Shusei Sato

  • Sequencing the Genespaces of Medicago truncatula and Lotus japonicus

    Nevin D. Young;Steven B. Cannon;Shusei Sato;Dongjin Kim

  • The control of trichome spacing and number in Arabidopsis

    J.C. Larkin;N. Young;M. Prigge;M.D. Marks

  • Identification and characterization of nucleotide-binding site-leucine-rich repeat genes in the model plant Medicago truncatula.

    Carine Ameline-Torregrosa;Bing Bing Wang;Majesta S. O'Bleness;Shweta Deshpande

  • Evidence for Orthologous Seed Weight Genes in Cowpea and Mung Bean Based on RFLP Mapping

    Christian A. Fatokun;Desiree I. Menancio-Hautea;Dariush Danesh;Nevin D. Young

  • High-throughput genotyping with the GoldenGate assay in the complex genome of soybean

    David L. Hyten;Qijian Song;Qijian Song;Ik Young Choi;Ik Young Choi;Mun Sup Yoon;Mun Sup Yoon

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Tiffin
Peter Tiffin University of Minnesota
Joann Mudge
Joann Mudge National Center for Genome Resources
Steven B. Cannon
Steven B. Cannon Agricultural Research Service
Randy C. Shoemaker
Randy C. Shoemaker Agricultural Research Service
Douglas R. Cook
Douglas R. Cook University of California, Davis
Bruce A. Roe
Bruce A. Roe University of Oklahoma
Michael J. Sadowsky
Michael J. Sadowsky University of Minnesota
Andrew Farmer
Andrew Farmer National Center for Genome Resources
Christopher D. Town
Christopher D. Town J. Craig Venter Institute
Steven D. Tanksley
Steven D. Tanksley Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying Genetics in the USA, there are a variety of online degrees and alternative career pathways worth considering. Many students who pursue genetics are also drawn to related healthcare roles that require specialized knowledge but may not need advanced degrees. For example, careers in online medical billing and coding offer remote work opportunities and can be a practical entry point into the medical field.

Fast-tracking your education is possible too. Several fast track college degree options enable motivated learners to graduate sooner and jumpstart their careers. For those looking to save on costs, choosing the cheapest self-paced online college can offer flexibility without breaking the bank. Additionally, some free application online colleges let you apply at no cost, making it easier to find the right program.

These online pathways not only provide greater education accessibility but also open doors to diverse roles in genetics, healthcare, research, and data analysis for students across different backgrounds.

Best Scientists Citing Nevin D. Young

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles