World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
43
Citations
12455
World Ranking
7295
National Ranking
3149

Michael E. Smith publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael E. Smith sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 67 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Michael E. Smith D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael E. Smith sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael E. Smith is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within Environmental Science and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with notable contributions in molecular biology, global and planetary change, cancer research, ecology, and nature and landscape conservation.

Their recent publications demonstrate a focus on marine biology, molecular mechanisms in cancer, and auditory biology. Key papers include:

  • "Physical effects of sound exposure from underwater explosions on Pacific mackerel (Scomber japonicus): Effects on the inner ear" (2022) published in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • "Effects of L-Serine Against Cisplatin-Mediated Reactive Oxygen Species Generation in Zebrafish Vestibular Tissue Culture and HEI-OC1 Auditory Hybridoma Cells" (2020) published in Neurotoxicity Research
  • "A Pharmacokinetic Bioequivalence Study of Fremanezumab Administered Subcutaneously Using an Autoinjector and a Prefilled Syringe" (2021) published in Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development
  • "RNA-Seq Analysis of Cisplatin and the Monofunctional Platinum(II) Complex, Phenanthriplatin, in A549 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and IMR90 Lung Fibroblast Cell Lines" (2020) published in Cells
  • "The monofunctional platinum(II) compounds, phenanthriplatin and pyriplatin, modulate apoptosis signaling pathways in HEI-OC1 auditory hybridoma cells" (2020) published in NeuroToxicology

The main research topics addressed in their work cover a diverse range of biological and environmental themes:

  • Marine animal studies overview
  • Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Amphibian and Reptile Biology
  • Metal complexes synthesis and properties
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Jerry D. Monroe
  • Satya A. Moolani
  • Elvin N. Irihamye
  • Yann Gibert
  • Steve Huskey

Michael E. Smith has published regularly in scientific venues such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America and Integrative and Comparative Biology. Other notable publication outlets include Neurotoxicity Research, NeuroToxicology, and Urban Forestry & Urban Greening.

Best Publications

  • High-resolution EEG mapping of cortical activation related to working memory: effects of task difficulty, type of processing, and practice.

    Alan Gevins;Michael E. Smith;Linda McEvoy;Daphne Yu

  • Neurophysiological Measures of Working Memory and Individual Differences in Cognitive Ability and Cognitive Style

    Alan Gevins;Michael E. Smith

  • Monitoring Working Memory Load during Computer-Based Tasks with EEG Pattern Recognition Methods

    Alan S. Gevins;Michael E. Smith;Harrison Leong;Linda McEvoy

  • Neurophysiological manifestations of recollective experience during recognition memory judgments

    Michael E. Smith

  • Neurophysiological measures of cognitive workload during human-computer interaction

    Alan Gevins;Michael E. Smith

  • The intracranial topography of the P3 event-related potential elicited during auditory oddball.

    Michael E. Smith;Eric Halgren;Eric Halgren;Margaret Sokolik;Margaret Sokolik;Margaret Sokolik;Patrick Baudena;Patrick Baudena

  • Bilateral hippocampal volume reduction in adults with post-traumatic stress disorder: a meta-analysis of structural MRI studies.

    Michael E. Smith

  • Human medial temporal lobe potentials evoked in memory and language tasks

    Michael E Smith;Michael E Smith;June M Stapleton;Eric Halgren;Eric Halgren

  • Neurophysiological signals of working memory in normal aging.

    Linda K McEvoy;Emiliana Pellouchoud;Michael E Smith;Alan Gevins

  • Neurophysiological indices of strategy development and skill acquisition

    Michael E Smith;Linda K McEvoy;Alan Gevins

  • Neural encoding of individual words and faces by the human hippocampus and amygdala

    Gary Heit;Gary Heit;Michael E. Smith;Michael E. Smith;Eric Halgren

  • Dissociation of recognition memory components following temporal lobe lesions.

    Michael E. Smith;Eric Halgren

  • Dynamic cortical networks of verbal and spatial working memory: effects of memory load and task practice.

    L K McEvoy;M E Smith;A Gevins

  • High resolution evoked potential imaging of the cortical dynamics of human working memory

    Alan Gevins;Michael E. Smith;Jian Le;Harrison Leong

  • MONITORING TASK LOADING WITH MULTIVARIATE EEG MEASURES DURING COMPLEX FORMS OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION

    Michael E. Smith;Alan S. Gevins;Halle Brown;Arati Karnik

  • Cognitive evoked potentials as modulatory processes in human memory formation and retrieval.

    E Halgren;M E Smith

  • The impact of moderate sleep loss on neurophysiologic signals during working-memory task performance.

    Michael E. Smith;Linda K. McEvoy;Alan Gevins

  • Neurocognitive function EEG measurement method and system

    Alan S. Gevins;Michael E. Smith

  • Neurocognitive adaptive computer-aided training method and system

    Alan Gevins;Harrison Leong;Isabel Sam-Vargas;Michael Smith

  • Effects of marijuana on neurophysiological signals of working and episodic memory

    Aaron B. Ilan;Michael E. Smith;Alan Gevins

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan Gevins
Alan Gevins San Francicso Brain Research Institute & SAM Technology
Eric Halgren
Eric Halgren University of California, San Diego
Linda K. McEvoy
Linda K. McEvoy University of California, San Diego
Manjusha Gaglani
Manjusha Gaglani Baylor College of Medicine
Manish M. Patel
Manish M. Patel Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Brendan Flannery
Brendan Flannery Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Kimford J. Meador
Kimford J. Meador Stanford University
Patrick Chauvel
Patrick Chauvel University of Pittsburgh
Huong Q. McLean
Huong Q. McLean Marshfield Clinic
Marlene Oscar-Berman
Marlene Oscar-Berman Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Michael E. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles