World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
60
Citations
18008
World Ranking
3775
National Ranking
1728

Martin A. Lindquist publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin A. Lindquist sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 188 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Martin A. Lindquist D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin A. Lindquist sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Overview

Martin A. Lindquist is a researcher affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States. Their work spans extensively across the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with a particular emphasis on Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Pharmacology, and Physiology.

The primary topics investigated by Lindquist include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, Neural dynamics and brain function, Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, Pain Management and Placebo Effect, and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces.

Lindquist's publication record is marked by contributions in several prominent academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), arXiv (Cornell University), Pain, NeuroImage, and Human Brain Mapping. These platforms reflect a focus on both preprint dissemination and peer-reviewed journals related to pain research and neuroimaging.

Some of the recent papers authored or coauthored by Lindquist are:

  • Predicting chronic postsurgical pain: current evidence and a novel program to develop predictive biomarker signatures, 2023, Pain
  • A human colliculus-pulvinar-amygdala pathway encodes negative emotion, 2021, Neuron
  • Children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder spend more time in hyperconnected network states and less time in segregated network states as revealed by dynamic connectivity analysis, 2021, NeuroImage
  • Genetic risk shared across 24 chronic pain conditions: identification and characterization with genomic structural equation modeling, 2023, Pain
  • A dorsomedial prefrontal cortex-based dynamic functional connectivity model of rumination, 2023, Nature Communications

The research network of Martin A. Lindquist includes frequent collaborations with several coauthors, such as Tor D. Wager, Brian Caffo, James J. Pekar, Hamed Honari, and Patrick Sadil. These collaborations suggest a multidisciplinary approach involving varied expertise.

Lindquist's work is recognized through awards such as the Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA) in 2016, indicating a standing in statistical methodology relevant to their research domains.

Best Publications

  • Prefrontal-subcortical pathways mediating successful emotion regulation.

    Tor D. Wager;Matthew L. Davidson;Brent L. Hughes;Martin A. Lindquist

  • Fmri-based neurologic signature of physical pain

    Tor Wager;Martin Lindquist

  • Building better biomarkers: brain models in translational neuroimaging

    Choong Wan Woo;Luke J. Chang;Martin A. Lindquist;Tor D. Wager

  • The Statistical Analysis of fMRI Data.

    Martin A. Lindquist

  • Modeling the Hemodynamic Response Function in fMRI: Efficiency, Bias and Mis-modeling

    Martin A. Lindquist;Ji Meng Loh;Lauren Y. Atlas;Tor D. Wager

  • Questions and controversies in the study of time-varying functional connectivity in resting fMRI

    Daniel J. Lurie;Daniel Kessler;Danielle S. Bassett;Richard F. Betzel

  • Meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging data: current and future directions

    Tor D. Wager;Martin Lindquist;Lauren Kaplan

  • Brain mediators of predictive cue effects on perceived pain

    Lauren Y. Atlas;Niall Bolger;Martin A. Lindquist;Tor D. Wager

  • Brain mediators of cardiovascular responses to social threat: part I: Reciprocal dorsal and ventral sub-regions of the medial prefrontal cortex and heart-rate reactivity.

    Tor D. Wager;Christian E. Waugh;Martin A. Lindquist;Douglas C. Noll

  • Evaluating dynamic bivariate correlations in resting-state fMRI: a comparison study and a new approach.

    Martin A. Lindquist;Yuting Xu;Mary Beth Nebel;Brain S. Caffo

  • Spin-echo fMRI in humans using high spatial resolutions and high magnetic fields.

    Essa Yacoub;Timothy Q. Duong;Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele;Martin Lindquist

  • Separate neural representations for physical pain and social rejection

    Choong Wan Woo;Leonie Koban;Ethan Kross;Martin A. Lindquist

  • Dynamic connectivity regression: determining state-related changes in brain connectivity.

    Ivor Cribben;Ragnheidur Haraldsdottir;Lauren Y. Atlas;Tor D. Wager

  • Detection of time-varying signals in event-related fMRI designs.

    Jack Grinband;Tor D. Wager;Martin A. Lindquist;Vincent P. Ferrera

  • Brain mediators of cardiovascular responses to social threat, Part II: Prefrontal-subcortical pathways and relationship with anxiety

    Tor D. Wager;Vanessa A. van Ast;Brent L. Hughes;Matthew L. Davidson

  • Evaluating the consistency and specificity of neuroimaging data using meta-analysis.

    Tor D. Wager;Martin A. Lindquist;Thomas E. Nichols;Thomas E. Nichols;Hedy Kober

  • Quantifying cerebral contributions to pain beyond nociception.

    Choong Wan Woo;Liane Schmidt;Anjali Krishnan;Marieke Jepma

  • Modular preprocessing pipelines can reintroduce artifacts into fMRI data

    Martin A. Lindquist;Stephan Geuter;Stephan Geuter;Tor D. Wager;Brian S. Caffo

  • Everything You Never Wanted to Know about Circular Analysis, but Were Afraid to Ask

    Nikolaus Kriegeskorte;Martin A Lindquist;Thomas E Nichols;Thomas E Nichols;Thomas E Nichols;Russell A Poldrack

  • Comparing test-retest reliability of dynamic functional connectivity methods

    Ann S. Choe;Mary Beth Nebel;Anita D. Barber;Jessica R. Cohen

  • Validity and Power in Hemodynamic Response Modeling: A Comparison Study and a New Approach

    Martin A. Lindquist;Tor D. Wager

Frequent Co-Authors

Tor D. Wager
Tor D. Wager Dartmouth College
James J. Pekar
James J. Pekar Kennedy Krieger Institute
Stewart H. Mostofsky
Stewart H. Mostofsky Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Wesley K. Thompson
Wesley K. Thompson University of California, San Diego
Pablo Celnik
Pablo Celnik Johns Hopkins University
Moo K. Chung
Moo K. Chung University of Wisconsin–Madison
Hernando Ombao
Hernando Ombao King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Gary H. Glover
Gary H. Glover Stanford University
Thomas E. Nichols
Thomas E. Nichols University of Oxford
Yuval Neria
Yuval Neria Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Martin A. Lindquist

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles