World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 47 6551 6362 2897 2790 403 8030

Mark A. Anastasio publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark A. Anastasio between 1997 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark A. Anastasio published across 30 years, from 1997 to 2026, averaging 19 papers a year. Output peaked at 46 publications in 2024. 34 of the 569 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 46. Peak 46 publications in 2024. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 9 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 18 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 26 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 28 publications 2016: 26 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 24 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 42 publications 2022: 36 publications 2023: 42 publications 2024: 46 publications 2025: 33 publications 2026: 1 publication
1997 2026

569 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark A. Anastasio: publications per year, 1997 to 2026
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 9
1999 7
2000 4
2001 3
2002 6
2003 9
2004 10
2005 17
2006 18
2007 14
2008 11
2009 13
2010 18
2011 11
2012 26
2013 15
2014 24
2015 28
2016 26
2017 23
2018 25
2019 24
2020 27
2021 42
2022 36
2023 42
2024 46
2025 33
2026 1
Total 569
Download as CSV

Mark A. Anastasio publications per year - data summary

  • Mark A. Anastasio, a Computer Science scholar from University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, has 569 publications recorded across 30 years, from 1997 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1997 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2024, with 46 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1997 and 2026, with 1 publication each.
  • The rate of publication averages 19.0 papers per year over the whole span, or 19.0 per year counting only the 30 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 158 publications, 28% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1997-2006: 84 publications (8.4 per year); 2007-2016: 186 publications (18.6 per year); 2017-2026: 299 publications (29.9 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Mark A. Anastasio publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Anastasio sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 402–411 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 403 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104 403
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark A. Anastasio publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 32–41 to 991+ publications.
  • Mark A. Anastasio, a Computer Science scholar from University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, records 403 publications - the 87th percentile of the discipline.
  • 87% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Mark A. Anastasio, and about 13% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 202–211 publications range, and Mark A. Anastasio ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 142–151 publications, holding 609 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 272–281 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 991 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Mark A. Anastasio D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Anastasio sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689 47
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Mark A. Anastasio D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 52 ranges running from 30–31 to 131+ D-Index.
  • Mark A. Anastasio, a Computer Science scholar from University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, records 47 D-Index - the 56th percentile of the discipline.
  • 56% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Mark A. Anastasio, and about 44% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44–45 D-Index range, and Mark A. Anastasio ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 36–37 D-Index, holding 990 scientists (7% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54–55 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - SPIE Fellow
  • 2016 - Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE)

Overview

Mark A. Anastasio is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their research spans multiple intersecting fields including Engineering, Medicine, and Computer Science, with a notable focus on Biomedical Engineering, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Their work also intersects with Artificial Intelligence and Biophysics.

The scientist's research topics encompass a broad range of imaging and analysis techniques. Key topics include Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging, Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications, Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques, Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis, Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography, Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging, and Cell Image Analysis Techniques.

Among their recent publications are:

  • High-resolution transcriptional and morphogenetic profiling of cells from micropatterned human ESC gastruloid cultures (2020, eLife)
  • Live-dead assay on unlabeled cells using phase imaging with computational specificity (2022, Nature Communications)
  • Deeply-supervised density regression for automatic cell counting in microscopy images (2020, Medical Image Analysis)
  • Assessing the Impact of Deep Neural Network-Based Image Denoising on Binary Signal Detection Tasks (2021, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging)
  • Context-aware deep learning enables high-efficacy localization of high concentration microbubbles for super-resolution ultrasound localization microscopy (2024, Nature Communications)

The venues where they have frequently published include arXiv (Cornell University), Harvard Dataverse, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and the Journal of Medical Imaging.

Mark A. Anastasio has collaborated extensively with several co-authors, including Umberto Villa, Frank J. Brooks, Hua Li, Weimin Zhou, and Seonyeong Park.

The scientist has been recognized with several awards, including the SPIE Fellow in 2018 and Fellowship at the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE) in 2016.

Best Publications

  • Imaging challenges in biomaterials and tissue engineering.

    Alyssa A. Appel;Mark A. Anastasio;Jeffery C. Larson;Jeffery C. Larson;Eric M. Brey;Eric M. Brey

  • Multiple-image radiography

    Miles N Wernick;Oliver Wirjadi;Oliver Wirjadi;Dean Chapman;Zhong Zhong

  • Full-Wave Iterative Image Reconstruction in Photoacoustic Tomography With Acoustically Inhomogeneous Media

    Chao Huang;Kun Wang;Liming Nie;L. V. Wang

  • Investigation of iterative image reconstruction in three-dimensional optoacoustic tomography

    Kun Wang;Richard Su;Alexander A Oraevsky;Mark A Anastasio

  • Whole-body ring-shaped confocal photoacoustic computed tomography of small animals in vivo

    Jun Xia;Muhammad R. Chatni;Konstantin I. Maslov;Zijian Guo

  • An Imaging Model Incorporating Ultrasonic Transducer Properties for Three-Dimensional Optoacoustic Tomography

    Kun Wang;Sergey A Ermilov;Richard Su;Hans-Peter Brecht

  • Waveform inversion with source encoding for breast sound speed reconstruction in ultrasound computed tomography

    Kun Wang;Thomas Matthews;Fatima Anis;Cuiping Li

  • Half-time image reconstruction in thermoacoustic tomography

    M.A. Anastasio;Jin Zhang;Xiaochuan Pan;Yu Zou

  • Application of inverse source concepts to photoacoustic tomography

    Mark A Anastasio;Jin Zhang;Dimple Modgil;Patrick J La Rivière

  • Multiobjective genetic optimization of diagnostic classifiers with implications for generating receiver operating characteristic curves

    M.A. Kupinski;M.A. Anastasio

  • Aberration correction for transcranial photoacoustic tomography of primates employing adjunct image data

    Chao Huang;Liming Nie;Robert W. Schoonover;Zijian Guo

  • Enhancement of photoacoustic tomography by ultrasonic computed tomography based on optical excitation of elements of a full-ring transducer array.

    Jun Xia;Chao Huang;Konstantin Maslov;Mark A. Anastasio

  • Generation of anatomically realistic numerical phantoms for photoacoustic and ultrasonic breast imaging.

    Yang Lou;Weimin Zhou;Thomas P. Matthews;Catherine M. Appleton

  • A survey of computational frameworks for solving the acoustic inverse problem in three-dimensional photoacoustic computed tomography.

    Joemini Poudel;Yang Lou;Mark A Anastasio

  • A physical model of multiple-image radiography

    Gocha Khelashvili;Jovan G Brankov;Dean Chapman;Mark A Anastasio

  • Statistical Reconstruction of Material Decomposed Data in Spectral CT

    C. O. Schirra;E. Roessl;T. Koehler;B. Brendel

  • Image reconstruction in optoacoustic tomography for dispersive acoustic media.

    Patrick J. La Rivière;Jin Zhang;Mark A. Anastasio

  • Photoacoustic and thermoacoustic tomography: Image formation principles

    Kun Wang;Mark A. Anastasio

  • Photoacoustic computed tomography correcting for heterogeneity and attenuation.

    Chao Huang;Liming Nie;Robert W. Schoonover;Lihong V. Wang

  • k-space undersampling in PROPELLER imaging.

    Konstantinos Arfanakis;Konstantinos Arfanakis;Ashish A. Tamhane;James G. Pipe;Mark A. Anastasio

Frequent Co-Authors

Lihong V. Wang
Lihong V. Wang California Institute of Technology
Xiaochuan Pan
Xiaochuan Pan University of Chicago
Alexander A. Oraevsky
Alexander A. Oraevsky University of Houston
Eric M. Brey
Eric M. Brey The University of Texas at San Antonio
Jun Xia
Jun Xia University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Konstantin Maslov
Konstantin Maslov California Institute of Technology
Miles N. Wernick
Miles N. Wernick Illinois Institute of Technology
Emil Y. Sidky
Emil Y. Sidky University of Chicago
Lilianna Solnica-Krezel
Lilianna Solnica-Krezel Washington University in St. Louis
Su Ruan
Su Ruan University of Rouen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Computer Science in the USA opens up a wide range of career pathways, many of which are supported by related online degree options. For those interested in network protection and information safety, online cybersecurity degree programs provide flexible training tailored to emerging threats in the digital world.

Technology is also transforming industries like construction. If you want to combine tech skills with project oversight, construction management courses can prepare you for leadership roles in building and infrastructure management.

Another growing field is criminal justice, where data science and digital forensics are increasingly important. Earning a criminal justice degree online can help you enter roles focused on law enforcement, cybercrime, or legal technology.

For those drawn to business and analytics, understanding accounting degree online cost can make it easier to plan a path towards careers in financial tech, auditing, or data-driven accounting.

By exploring these online degree fields, you can broaden your expertise and find diverse, rewarding opportunities alongside your Computer Science studies.

Best Scientists Citing Mark A. Anastasio

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles