| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 48 | 6098 | 5615 | 2662 | 2401 | 142 | 13476 |
The chart shows the history of publications by M. Elizabeth Meyerand between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. M. Elizabeth Meyerand published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 5 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2002. 6 of the 155 publications appeared in the last two years.
155 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1995 | 1 |
| 1996 | 0 |
| 1997 | 0 |
| 1998 | 2 |
| 1999 | 1 |
| 2000 | 6 |
| 2001 | 5 |
| 2002 | 15 |
| 2003 | 6 |
| 2004 | 4 |
| 2005 | 3 |
| 2006 | 5 |
| 2007 | 5 |
| 2008 | 4 |
| 2009 | 2 |
| 2010 | 3 |
| 2011 | 7 |
| 2012 | 7 |
| 2013 | 9 |
| 2014 | 12 |
| 2015 | 5 |
| 2016 | 10 |
| 2017 | 4 |
| 2018 | 8 |
| 2019 | 5 |
| 2020 | 7 |
| 2021 | 3 |
| 2022 | 2 |
| 2023 | 8 |
| 2024 | 5 |
| 2025 | 1 |
| Total | 155 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Elizabeth Meyerand sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 142 publications — 39th percentile
39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 38–47 | 18 | |
| 48–57 | 79 | |
| 58–67 | 193 | |
| 68–77 | 323 | |
| 78–87 | 406 | |
| 88–97 | 452 | |
| 98–107 | 539 | |
| 108–117 | 505 | |
| 118–127 | 522 | |
| 128–137 | 469 | |
| 138–147 | 456 | 142 |
| 148–157 | 459 | |
| 158–167 | 397 | |
| 168–177 | 383 | |
| 178–187 | 350 | |
| 188–197 | 302 | |
| 198–207 | 306 | |
| 208–217 | 262 | |
| 218–227 | 242 | |
| 228–237 | 220 | |
| 238–247 | 203 | |
| 248–257 | 174 | |
| 258–267 | 176 | |
| 268–277 | 175 | |
| 278–287 | 125 | |
| 288–297 | 116 | |
| 298–307 | 127 | |
| 308–317 | 128 | |
| 318–327 | 99 | |
| 328–337 | 89 | |
| 338–347 | 78 | |
| 348–357 | 96 | |
| 358–367 | 66 | |
| 368–377 | 59 | |
| 378–387 | 65 | |
| 388–397 | 54 | |
| 398–407 | 48 | |
| 408–417 | 49 | |
| 418–427 | 34 | |
| 428–437 | 31 | |
| 438–447 | 30 | |
| 448–457 | 31 | |
| 458–467 | 36 | |
| 468–477 | 40 | |
| 478–487 | 35 | |
| 488–497 | 30 | |
| 498–507 | 23 | |
| 508–517 | 26 | |
| 518–527 | 20 | |
| 528–537 | 23 | |
| 538–547 | 20 | |
| 548–557 | 20 | |
| 558–567 | 17 | |
| 568–577 | 14 | |
| 578–587 | 20 | |
| 588–597 | 20 | |
| 598–607 | 19 | |
| 608–617 | 18 | |
| 618–627 | 17 | |
| 628–637 | 11 | |
| 638–647 | 11 | |
| 648–657 | 11 | |
| 658–667 | 8 | |
| 668–677 | 7 | |
| 678–687 | 11 | |
| 688–697 | 10 | |
| 698–707 | 4 | |
| 708–717 | 6 | |
| 718–727 | 5 | |
| 728–737 | 5 | |
| 738–747 | 9 | |
| 748–757 | 9 | |
| 758–767 | 3 | |
| 768–777 | 7 | |
| 778–787 | 7 | |
| 788–797 | 6 | |
| 798–807 | 2 | |
| 808–817 | 2 | |
| 818–827 | 7 | |
| 828–837 | 0 | |
| 838–847 | 9 | |
| 848–857 | 3 | |
| 858–867 | 1 | |
| 868–877 | 3 | |
| 878–886 | 6 | |
| 887+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Elizabeth Meyerand sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 48 D-Index — 37th percentile
37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30–31 | 42 | |
| 32–33 | 172 | |
| 34–35 | 296 | |
| 36–37 | 435 | |
| 38–39 | 459 | |
| 40–41 | 456 | |
| 42–43 | 467 | |
| 44–45 | 478 | |
| 46–47 | 512 | |
| 48–49 | 435 | 48 |
| 50–51 | 425 | |
| 52–53 | 418 | |
| 54–55 | 392 | |
| 56–57 | 357 | |
| 58–59 | 334 | |
| 60–61 | 328 | |
| 62–63 | 260 | |
| 64–65 | 278 | |
| 66–67 | 239 | |
| 68–69 | 250 | |
| 70–71 | 210 | |
| 72–73 | 200 | |
| 74–75 | 189 | |
| 76–77 | 170 | |
| 78–79 | 146 | |
| 80–81 | 113 | |
| 82–83 | 126 | |
| 84–85 | 100 | |
| 86–87 | 84 | |
| 88–89 | 99 | |
| 90–91 | 84 | |
| 92–93 | 85 | |
| 94–95 | 72 | |
| 96–97 | 76 | |
| 98–99 | 45 | |
| 100–101 | 49 | |
| 102–103 | 43 | |
| 104–105 | 32 | |
| 106–107 | 45 | |
| 108–109 | 50 | |
| 110–111 | 32 | |
| 112–113 | 39 | |
| 114–115 | 32 | |
| 116–117 | 29 | |
| 118–119 | 27 | |
| 120–121 | 19 | |
| 122–123 | 23 | |
| 124–125 | 27 | |
| 126–127 | 16 | |
| 128–129 | 24 | |
| 130–131 | 13 | |
| 132–133 | 21 | |
| 134–135 | 17 | |
| 136–137 | 14 | |
| 138–139 | 15 | |
| 140–141 | 10 | |
| 142–143 | 10 | |
| 144–145 | 13 | |
| 146–147 | 9 | |
| 148–149 | 8 | |
| 150–151 | 6 | |
| 152–153 | 6 | |
| 154–155 | 7 | |
| 156–157 | 7 | |
| 158–159 | 10 | |
| 160–161 | 4 | |
| 162 | 8 | |
| 163+ | 100 |
D Cordes;V M Haughton;K Arfanakis;J D Carew
D Cordes;V M Haughton;K Arfanakis;G J Wendt
Konstantinos Arfanakis;Victor M. Haughton;John D. Carew;Baxter P. Rogers
Rasmus M. Birn;Erin K. Molloy;Rémi Patriat;Taurean Parker
Mariana Lazar;David M. Weinstein;Jay S. Tsuruda;Khader M. Hasan
Brian P. Witwer;Roham Moftakhar;Khader M. Hasan;Praveen Deshmukh
Xi Nian Zuo;Jeffrey S. Anderson;Pierre Bellec;Rasmus M. Birn
Suzanne T. Witt;Angela R. Laird;M. Elizabeth Meyerand
Rémi Patriat;Erin K. Molloy;Timothy B. Meier;Gregory R. Kirk
S.C. Johnson;T.W. Schmitz;C.H. Moritz;M.E. Meyerand
Jie Song;Rasmus M. Birn;Mélanie Boly;Timothy B. Meier
Michelle E. Pizzo;Daniel J. Wolak;Niyanta N. Kumar;Eric Brunette
Konstantinos Arfanakis;Bruce P Hermann;Baxter P Rogers;John D Carew
Konstantinos Arfanakis;Dietmar Cordes;Victor M Haughton;Chad H Moritz
Michelle Quigley;Dietmar Cordes;Pat Turski;Chad Moritz
Timothy B. Meier;Alok S. Desphande;Svyatoslav Vergun;Veena A. Nair
Rubel Chakravarty;Rubel Chakravarty;Hector F. Valdovinos;Feng Chen;Christina M. Lewis
John H. Brannen;Behnam Badie;Chad H. Moritz;Michelle Quigley
Jeff F. Dunn;Jeff F. Dunn;Julia A. O'Hara;Youssef Zaim-Wadghiri;Hao Lei
C H Moritz;V M Haughton;D Cordes;M Quigley
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.