World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 40 7974 7366 668 635 178 11175

Lars Wojtecki publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lars Wojtecki between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lars Wojtecki published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 8.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2011. 14 of the 198 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2011. 2003: 2 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 9 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 25 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 11 publications
2003 2025

198 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lars Wojtecki: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 2
2004 4
2005 1
2006 9
2007 6
2008 5
2009 8
2010 9
2011 25
2012 17
2013 8
2014 6
2015 5
2016 21
2017 9
2018 13
2019 5
2020 3
2021 7
2022 11
2023 10
2024 3
2025 11
Total 198
Download as CSV

Lars Wojtecki publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lars Wojtecki sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 178–187 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 178 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350 178
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Lars Wojtecki D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lars Wojtecki sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456 40
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Lars Wojtecki is affiliated with Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf in Germany, contributing extensively to the fields of medicine and neuroscience. Their research primarily spans neurology, anesthesiology and pain medicine, cognitive neuroscience, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, and infectious diseases.

The scientist's work addresses various main topics, including:

  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Neurological Disorders and Treatments
  • Pain Management and Treatment
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine
  • Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Wojtecki are:

  • Retrospective real-world pilot data on transcranial pulse stimulation in mild to severe Alzheimer's patients, 2022, Frontiers in Neurology
  • Non-epileptic seizures in autonomic dysfunction as the initial symptom of COVID-19, 2020, Journal of Neurology
  • Enhancement of Executive Functions but Not Memory by Multidomain Group Cognitive Training in Patients with Parkinson's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial, 2020, Parkinson's Disease
  • Screen Fast, Screen Faster: A Pilot Study to Screen for Depressive Symptoms Using the Beck Depression Inventory Fast Screen in Parkinson's Disease With Mild Cognitive Impairment, 2021, Frontiers in Neurology
  • The Contribution of Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation to the Improvement in Motor Functions and Quality of Life, 2022, Movement Disorders

Frequent co-authors in Wojtecki's research include:

  • Celine Cont
  • Anastasia Galli
  • Nathalie Stute
  • Christina Schulte
  • Carlos Trenado

Wojtecki has published repeatedly in several professional venues, such as:

  • Journal of Neurology
  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Brain Stimulation
  • Frontiers in Neurology
  • Parkinsonism & Related Disorders

Their research contributions are notably concentrated in neurology, with 56 publications, supported by work in associated subfields that include anesthesiology and pain medicine, and cognitive neuroscience among others. This multidisciplinary approach reflects engagement with both foundational and applied medical research, especially targeting neurological and movement disorders.

Best Publications

  • A Randomized Trial of Deep-Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease

    Günther Deuschl;Carmen Schade-Brittinger;Paul Krack;Jens Volkmann

  • Neurostimulation for Parkinson's Disease with Early Motor Complications

    W. M. M. Schuepbach;J. Rau;K. Knudsen;J. Volkmann

  • Neuropsychological and psychiatric changes after deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: a randomised, multicentre study

    Karsten Witt;Christine Daniels;Julia Reiff;Paul Krack

  • Long-term results of a multicenter study on subthalamic and pallidal stimulation in Parkinson's disease.

    Elena Moro;Andres M. Lozano;Pierre Pollak;Yves Agid

  • Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease

    S J Groiss;L Wojtecki;M Südmeyer;Alfons Schnitzler

  • Distinct oscillatory STN-cortical loops revealed by simultaneous MEG and local field potential recordings in patients with Parkinson's disease

    Jan Hirschmann;Tolga E. Özkurt;Markus Butz;M. Homburger

  • Ten‐Hertz stimulation of subthalamic nucleus deteriorates motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease

    Lars Timmermann;Lars Wojtecki;Joachim Gross;Ralph Lehrke

  • High frequency oscillations in the subthalamic nucleus: A neurophysiological marker of the motor state in Parkinson's disease

    Tolga Esat Özkurt;Markus Butz;Melanie Homburger;Saskia Elben

  • Behavioural outcomes of subthalamic stimulation and medical therapy versus medical therapy alone for Parkinson's disease with early motor complications (EARLYSTIM trial): secondary analysis of an open-label randomised trial.

    Eugenie Lhommee;Lars Wojtecki;Virginie Czernecki;Virginie Czernecki;Karsten Witt

  • Frequency-dependent reciprocal modulation of verbal fluency and motor functions in subthalamic deep brain stimulation.

    Lars Wojtecki;Lars Timmermann;Silke Jörgens;Martin Südmeyer

  • An update on best practice of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease.

    Christian J Hartmann;Sabine Fliegen;Stefan J Groiss;Lars Wojtecki

  • Differential modulation of STN-cortical and cortico-muscular coherence by movement and levodopa in Parkinson's disease.

    Jan Hirschmann;Tolga E. Özkurt;Markus Butz;Markus Butz;M. Homburger

  • A direct relationship between oscillatory subthalamic nucleus-cortex coupling and rest tremor in Parkinson's disease.

    Jan Hirschmann;Christian J. Hartmann;Markus Butz;Markus Butz;Nienke Hoogenboom

  • Deep brain stimulation in the nucleus ventralis intermedius in patients with essential tremor: habituation of tremor suppression

    Michael T. Barbe;Lena Liebhart;Matthias Runge;K. Amande M. Pauls

  • Deep brain stimulation of the ventral intermediate nucleus in patients with essential tremor: Stimulation below intercommissural line is more efficient but equally effective as stimulation above

    Michael T. Barbe;Lena Liebhart;Matthias Runge;Janina Deyng

  • Characterisation of tremor-associated local field potentials in the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson’s disease

    Christiane Reck;Esther Florin;Lars Wojtecki;Holger Krause

  • Risk factors for executive dysfunction after subthalamic nucleus stimulation in Parkinson's disease.

    Christine Daniels;Paul Krack;Jens Volkmann;Markus O. Pinsker

  • Is improvement in the quality of life after subthalamic nucleus stimulation in Parkinson's disease predictable?

    Christine Daniels;Paul Krack;Jens Volkmann;Jan Raethjen

  • Essential tremor and tremor in Parkinson's disease are associated with distinct 'tremor clusters' in the ventral thalamus

    David J. Pedrosa;Christiane Reck;Esther Florin;K. Amande M. Pauls

  • Diagnostic Accuracy of Combined FP-CIT, IBZM, and MIBG Scintigraphy in the Differential Diagnosis of Degenerative Parkinsonism: A Multidimensional Statistical Approach

    Martin Südmeyer;Christina Antke;Tanja Zizek;Markus Beu

  • Quality of life predicts outcome of deep brain stimulation in early Parkinson disease

    W.M. Michael Schuepbach;Lisa Tonder;Alfons Schnitzler;Paul Krack

Frequent Co-Authors

Alfons Schnitzler
Alfons Schnitzler Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Jan Vesper
Jan Vesper Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Lars Timmermann
Lars Timmermann Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Volker Sturm
Volker Sturm University of Cologne
Joachim Gross
Joachim Gross University of Münster
Jens Volkmann
Jens Volkmann University of Würzburg
Günther Deuschl
Günther Deuschl Kiel University
Paul Krack
Paul Krack University of Bern
Bettina Pollok
Bettina Pollok Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Karsten Witt
Karsten Witt Kiel University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience can open doors to a range of rewarding careers in psychology, therapy, research, and healthcare. Students interested in advanced psychology careers often consider psyd programs usa, which prepare graduates for clinical practice and leadership in mental health.

For those focused on helping individuals and families navigate mental health challenges, the flexibility of mft online programs (Marriage and Family Therapy) provides a fast-track to valuable credentials. These online degrees are ideal for students balancing work, school, and family commitments.

If you want to accelerate your path to a neuroscience or related degree, consider accelerated bachelor's degree options. These programs are designed to help you earn your qualifications in less time, so you can enter the workforce sooner.

Curious about your long-term potential? Discover which science and health degrees lead to top earnings by checking out the top 10 best bachelor degrees. Identifying high-demand fields can help you make strategic choices for your future.

Best Scientists Citing Lars Wojtecki

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles