World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
40
Citations
10793
World Ranking
2241
National Ranking
1282

Kenneth L. Sokoloff publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth L. Sokoloff sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 144 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Kenneth L. Sokoloff D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth L. Sokoloff sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kenneth L. Sokoloff was affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles, in the United States. Their academic work involved collaboration with Naomi R. Lamoreaux as a frequent co-author.

The available data does not list specific research papers, but it highlights the professional association and collaborative relationships that were part of their scholarly activities.

Throughout their career, Sokoloff engaged in research within various fields and topics, although explicit details of main fields of study, subfields, and research topics are not provided.

  • Naomi R. Lamoreaux

Best Publications

  • History Lessons Institutions, Factor Endowments, and Paths of Development in the New World

    Kenneth L. Sokoloff;Stanley L. Engerman

  • Factor Endowments, Institutions, and Differential Paths of Growth Among New World Economies: : A View from Economic Historians of the United States

    Stanley L. Engerman;Kenneth L. Sokoloff

  • Factor Endowments, Inequality, and Paths of Development among New World Economies

    Stanley L. Engerman;Kenneth Lee Sokoloff

  • Factor Endowments: Institutions, and Differential Paths of Growth Among New World Economies: A View from Economic Historians of the United States

    Stanley L. Engerman;Stanley L. Engerman;Kenneth L. Sokoloff;Kenneth L. Sokoloff

  • Exports and Manufacturing Productivity in East Asia: A Comparative Analysis with Firm-Level Data

    Mary Hallward-Driemeier;Giuseppe Iarossi;Kenneth L. Sokoloff

  • Factor Endowments, Inequality, and Paths of Development among New World Economies

    Unknown

  • Inventive Activity in Early Industrial America: Evidence From Patent Records, 1790 - 1846

    Kenneth L. Sokoloff

  • The Evolution of Suffrage Institutions in the New World

    Stanley L. Engerman;Kenneth L. Sokoloff

  • Factor Endowments, Inequality, and Paths of Development Among New World Economics

    Stanley L. Engerman;Kenneth Sokoloff

  • Colonialism, Inequality, and Long-Run Paths of Development

    Stanley L. Engerman;Kenneth L. Sokoloff

  • Inventors, Firms, and the Market for Technology in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries

    Naomi R. Lamoreaux;Kenneth L. Sokoloff

  • Women, Children, and Industrialization in the Early Republic: Evidence from the Manufacturing Censuses

    Claudia Goldin;Kenneth L Sokoloff

  • Inventors, Firms, and the Market for Technology in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries

    Naomi R. Lamoreaux;Kenneth L. Sokoloff

  • COLONIALISM, INEQUALITY, AND LONG-RUN PATHS OF DEVELOPMENT

    Stanley L. Engerman;Stanley L. Engerman;Kenneth L. Sokoloff;Kenneth L. Sokoloff

  • The Democratization of Invention During Early Industrialization: Evidence from the United States, 1790–1846

    Kenneth L. Sokoloff;B. Zorina Khan

  • Institutional and Non-Institutional Explanations of Economic Differences

    Stanley L. Engerman;Kenneth Sokoloff

  • Economic development in the Americas since 1500 : endowments and institutions

    Stanley L Engerman;Kenneth L Sokoloff

  • Exports and manufacturing productivity in East Asia A comparative analysis with firm - level data

    Mary Hallward-Driemeier;Giuseppe Iarossi;Kenneth L Sokoloff;Kenneth L Sokoloff

  • Factor Endowments, Inequality, and Paths of Development Among New World Economics

    Stanley L. Engerman;Stanley L. Engerman;Kenneth L. Sokoloff;Kenneth L. Sokoloff

  • The Early Achievement of Modern Stature in America

    Kenneth L. Sokoloff;Georgia C. Villaflor

  • 'Schemes of Practical Utility': Entrepreneurship and Innovation Among 'Great Inventors' in the United States, 1790-1865

    B. Zorina Khan;Kenneth L. Sokoloff

  • Was the transition from the artisanal shop to the nonmechanized factory associated with gains in efficiency?: Evidence from the U.S. Manufacturing censuses of 1820 and 1850

    Kenneth L. Sokoloff

  • Inequality and the Evolution of Institutions of Taxation: Evidence from the Economic History of the Americas

    Kenneth L Sokoloff;Eric M Zolt

  • The Relative Productivity Hypothesis of Industrialization: The American Case, 1820 to 1850

    Claudia D Goldin;Kenneth L Sokoloff

  • The Early Development of Intellectual Property Institutions in the United States

    B. Zorina Khan;Kenneth L. Sokoloff

  • Inventive Activity and the Market for Technology in the United States, 1840-1920

    Naomi R. Lamoreaux;Kenneth Sokoloff

  • Factor Endowments, Institutions, and Differential Paths of Growth Among New World Economies:

    Stanley L. Engerman;Kenneth L. Sokoloff

  • Women, Children, and Industrialization in the Early Republic: Evidence from the Manufacturing Censuses

    Claudia Goldin;Claudia Goldin;Kenneth L. Sokoloff;Kenneth L. Sokoloff

Frequent Co-Authors

Stanley L. Engerman
Stanley L. Engerman University of Rochester
Claudia Goldin
Claudia Goldin Harvard University
David Dollar
David Dollar Brookings Institution
Stephen Haber
Stephen Haber Stanford University
Sandra E. Black
Sandra E. Black Columbia University
Ariel Pakes
Ariel Pakes Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Economics and Finance, a wide range of related online graduate programs can expand your skillset and open up diverse career opportunities. Many professionals are now seeking flexible options to fit their goals and busy schedules.

If you’re aspiring to leadership roles, a master's in organizational leadership online can equip you with essential management and decision-making skills valued across industries.

Those looking to harness the power of data and analytics may find an online master's in business intelligence to be a strategic pathway. This degree prepares graduates to interpret complex data and support business strategy, a growing need in today's data-driven economy.

For professionals aiming for a comprehensive business education, pursuing an no gmat online mba offers convenience and accessibility, as many top programs no longer require standardized test scores. Additionally, budget-conscious students can explore an online mba under 30k to gain high-quality credentials without the hefty price tag.

These online degrees can help you build specialized expertise, enhance your résumé, and broaden your professional horizons in the dynamic world of economics and finance.

Best Scientists Citing Kenneth L. Sokoloff

Recently Published Articles