World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 88 2307 2073 823 687 371 26235

Karena W. Chapman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Karena W. Chapman between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Karena W. Chapman published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 17.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 44 publications in 2017. 46 of the 444 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 44. Peak 44 publications in 2017. 2001: 2 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 22 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 34 publications 2015: 22 publications 2016: 34 publications 2017: 44 publications 2018: 26 publications 2019: 23 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 26 publications 2023: 33 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 29 publications
2001 2025

444 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Karena W. Chapman: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 2
2002 0
2003 1
2004 0
2005 6
2006 4
2007 10
2008 12
2009 13
2010 7
2011 20
2012 22
2013 19
2014 34
2015 22
2016 34
2017 44
2018 26
2019 23
2020 18
2021 22
2022 26
2023 33
2024 17
2025 29
Total 444
Download as CSV

Karena W. Chapman publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karena W. Chapman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 361–380 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 371 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522 371
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Karena W. Chapman D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karena W. Chapman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235 88
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Karena W. Chapman is affiliated with Stony Brook University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on materials science, engineering, and chemistry, with a significant contribution to materials chemistry, electrical and electronic engineering, and inorganic chemistry. Their work extends into subfields such as mechanical engineering and electronic, optical, and magnetic materials.

The scientist's publication portfolio includes numerous articles in well-regarded journals. Frequent publication venues are as follows:

  • Journal of the American Chemical Society
  • The Cambridge Structural Database
  • Journal of Applied Crystallography
  • ACS Materials Letters
  • Journal of Materials Chemistry A

Some of Karena W. Chapman's recent papers include:

  • "A stable cathode-solid electrolyte composite for high-voltage, long-cycle-life solid-state sodium-ion batteries," published in 2021 in Nature Communications
  • "Revisiting metal fluorides as lithium-ion battery cathodes," published in 2021 in Nature Materials
  • "Intrinsic Kinetic Limitations in Substituted Lithium-Layered Transition-Metal Oxide Electrodes," published in 2020 in Journal of the American Chemical Society
  • "Dynamic two-dimensional covalent organic frameworks," published in 2024 in Nature Chemistry
  • "Densified HKUST-1 Monoliths as a Route to High Volumetric and Gravimetric Hydrogen Storage Capacity," published in 2022 in Journal of the American Chemical Society

Their collaboration network includes frequent co-authors such as:

  • Zhihengyu Chen
  • Simon M. Vornholt
  • Omar K. Farha
  • Daniel O'Nolan
  • Antonin Grenier

Their research covers key topics within materials science and chemistry, which include:

  • Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
  • X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
  • Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
  • Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis
  • Polyoxometalates: Synthesis and Applications

The accumulation of publications and involvement across several thematic areas underscores Karena W. Chapman's multidisciplinary approach, particularly centered around battery materials, metal-organic frameworks, and crystallographic methods. Their engagement with computational techniques, such as machine learning applied to materials science, reflects contemporary trends in the field.

Best Publications

  • Origin of additional capacities in metal oxide lithium-ion battery electrodes

    Yan-Yan Hu;Zigeng Liu;Kyung-Wan Nam;Olaf J Borkiewicz

  • Capture of Volatile Iodine, a Gaseous Fission Product, by Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework-8

    Dorina F. Sava;Mark A. Rodriguez;Karena W. Chapman;Peter J. Chupas

  • Radioactive Iodine Capture in Silver-Containing Mordenites through Nanoscale Silver Iodide Formation

    Karena W. Chapman;Peter J. Chupas;Tina M. Nenoff

  • Capturing metastable structures during high-rate cycling of LiFePO4 nanoparticle electrodes

    Hao Liu;Fiona C. Strobridge;Olaf J. Borkiewicz;Kamila M. Wiaderek

  • A New Class of Lithium and Sodium Rechargeable Batteries Based on Selenium and Selenium–Sulfur as a Positive Electrode

    Ali Abouimrane;Damien Dambournet;Karena W. Chapman;Peter J. Chupas

  • Pronounced Negative Thermal Expansion from a Simple Structure: Cubic ScF3

    Benjamin K. Greve;Kenneth L. Martin;Peter L. Lee;Peter J. Chupas

  • Molecular docking sites designed for the generation of highly crystalline covalent organic frameworks

    Laura Ascherl;Torben Sick;Johannes T. Margraf;Saul H. Lapidus

  • Intergranular Cracking as a Major Cause of Long-Term Capacity Fading of Layered Cathodes.

    Hao Liu;Mark Wolf;Khim Karki;Young-Sang Yu;Young-Sang Yu

  • Pressure-Induced Amorphization and Porosity Modification in a Metal−Organic Framework

    Karena W. Chapman;Gregory J. Halder;Peter J. Chupas

  • Dynamic interplay between spin-crossover and host-guest function in a nanoporous metal-organic framework material.

    Peter D Southon;Lang Liu;Elizabeth A Fellows;David J Price

  • Reversible magnesium and aluminium ions insertion in cation-deficient anatase TiO2

    Toshinari Koketsu;Jiwei Ma;Jiwei Ma;Benjamin J. Morgan;Monique Body

  • High Efficiency Adsorption and Removal of Selenate and Selenite from Water Using Metal–Organic Frameworks

    Ashlee J. Howarth;Michael J. Katz;Timothy C. Wang;Ana E. Platero-Prats

  • Competitive I2 Sorption by Cu-BTC from Humid Gas Streams

    Dorina F. Sava;Karena W. Chapman;Mark A. Rodriguez;Jeffery A. Greathouse

  • A versatile sample‐environment cell for non‐ambient X‐ray scattering experiments

    Peter J. Chupas;Karena W. Chapman;Charles Kurtz;Jonathan C. Hanson

  • Negative thermal expansion in the metal-organic framework material Cu3(1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylate)2.

    Yue Wu;Atsushi Kobayashi;Atsushi Kobayashi;Gregory J. Halder;Gregory J. Halder;Vanessa K. Peterson;Vanessa K. Peterson

  • Trapping guests within a nanoporous metal-organic framework through pressure-induced amorphization.

    Karena W. Chapman;Dorina F. Sava;Gregory J. Halder;Peter J. Chupas

  • Compositional dependence of negative thermal expansion in the prussian blue analogues MIIPtIV(CN)6 (M = Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Cd)

    Karena W. Chapman;Peter J. Chupas;Cameron J. Kepert

  • Reversible ferromagnetic–antiferromagnetic transformation upon dehydration–hydration of the nanoporous coordination framework, [Co3(OH)2(C4O4)2]·3H2O

    Mohamedally Kurmoo;Hitoshi Kumagai;Karena W. Chapman;Cameron J. Kepert

  • A stable cathode-solid electrolyte composite for high-voltage, long-cycle-life solid-state sodium-ion batteries.

    Erik A. Wu;Swastika Banerjee;Hanmei Tang;Peter M. Richardson

  • Metal–Organic Framework Supported Cobalt Catalysts for the Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Propane at Low Temperature

    Zhanyong Li;Aaron W. Peters;Varinia Bernales;Manuel A. Ortuño

  • Guest-Dependent Negative Thermal Expansion in Nanoporous Prussian Blue Analogues MIIPtIV(CN)6·x{H2O} (0 ≤ x ≤ 2; M = Zn, Cd)

    Andrew L. Goodwin;Karena W. Chapman;Cameron J. Kepert

  • Liquid metal–organic frameworks

    Romain Gaillac;Pluton Pullumbi;Kevin A. Beyer;Karena W. Chapman

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter J. Chupas
Peter J. Chupas Stony Brook University
Omar K. Farha
Omar K. Farha Northwestern University
Clare P. Grey
Clare P. Grey University of Cambridge
Joseph T. Hupp
Joseph T. Hupp Northwestern University
Cameron J. Kepert
Cameron J. Kepert University of Sydney
M. Stanley Whittingham
M. Stanley Whittingham Binghamton University
Angus P. Wilkinson
Angus P. Wilkinson Georgia Institute of Technology
Louis F. J. Piper
Louis F. J. Piper University of Warwick
Tina M. Nenoff
Tina M. Nenoff Sandia National Laboratories
Laura Gagliardi
Laura Gagliardi University of Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to diverse and rewarding careers. Many students seek related online degrees that complement their chemical knowledge and expand their professional options. For instance, becoming a pharmacist is a popular path, and understanding the how to become a pharmacist salary can provide insight into this well-compensated and stable career.

Another specialized field is forensic science, where chemistry plays a crucial role. Students interested in this area often explore online colleges for forensic science, which offer flexible learning options tailored to those wishing to combine chemistry with criminal justice.

For those looking to specialize further, pursuing forensic psychology master's programs online can enrich a chemistry background with psychological insights, especially useful in investigative fields.

Additionally, careers like an autopsy technician blend chemistry with biology and anatomy. Learning about the autopsy technician salary and educational requirements can help guide prospective students toward this unique career path.

Best Scientists Citing Karena W. Chapman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles