World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Juan Ignacio Godino-Llorente

Juan Ignacio Godino-Llorente

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 37 10867 10565 174 172 150 5048

Juan Ignacio Godino-Llorente publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Juan Ignacio Godino-Llorente between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Juan Ignacio Godino-Llorente published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 6.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2009. 26 of the 187 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2009. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 14 publications
1998 2025

187 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Juan Ignacio Godino-Llorente: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 2
2000 3
2001 1
2002 2
2003 1
2004 4
2005 7
2006 7
2007 6
2008 11
2009 16
2010 13
2011 12
2012 9
2013 9
2014 6
2015 9
2016 5
2017 3
2018 4
2019 13
2020 8
2021 4
2022 0
2023 5
2024 12
2025 14
Total 187
Download as CSV

Juan Ignacio Godino-Llorente publications per year - data summary

  • Juan Ignacio Godino-Llorente, a Computer Science scholar from Technical University of Madrid, has 187 publications recorded across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1998 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2009, with 16 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1998, 2001 and 2003, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 28 years in the span carries no publications at all (2022).
  • The rate of publication averages 6.7 papers per year over the whole span, or 6.9 per year counting only the 27 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 35 publications, 19% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1998-2007: 34 publications (3.4 per year); 2008-2017: 93 publications (9.3 per year); 2018-2025: 60 publications (7.5 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Juan Ignacio Godino-Llorente publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Juan Ignacio Godino-Llorente sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 142–151 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 150 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609 150
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Juan Ignacio Godino-Llorente publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 32–41 to 991+ publications.
  • Juan Ignacio Godino-Llorente, a Computer Science scholar from Technical University of Madrid, records 150 publications - the 27th percentile of the discipline.
  • 27% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Juan Ignacio Godino-Llorente, and about 73% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 202–211 publications range, and Juan Ignacio Godino-Llorente ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 142–151 publications, holding 609 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 272–281 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 991 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Juan Ignacio Godino-Llorente D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Juan Ignacio Godino-Llorente sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990 37
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Juan Ignacio Godino-Llorente D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 52 ranges running from 30–31 to 131+ D-Index.
  • Juan Ignacio Godino-Llorente, a Computer Science scholar from Technical University of Madrid, records 37 D-Index - the 27th percentile of the discipline.
  • 27% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Juan Ignacio Godino-Llorente, and about 73% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44–45 D-Index range, and Juan Ignacio Godino-Llorente ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 36–37 D-Index, holding 990 scientists (7% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54–55 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Juan Ignacio Godino-Llorente is affiliated with the Technical University of Madrid in Spain. Their research spans multiple areas primarily focused on medicine and computer science, with a significant emphasis on artificial intelligence applications in healthcare.

The main fields of study in their work are:

  • Medicine
  • Computer Science

Their research also covers several subfields, including:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Physiology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Juan Ignacio Godino-Llorente's major topics of research include:

  • Voice and Speech Disorders
  • Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Dysphagia Assessment and Management
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Their recent papers illustrate a range of contributions to biomedical engineering, signal processing, and artificial intelligence. Selected publications are:

  • "Advances in Parkinson's Disease detection and assessment using voice and speech: A review of the articulatory and phonatory aspects," 2021, published in Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
  • "Artificial Intelligence Applied to Chest X-Ray Images for the Automatic Detection of COVID-19. A Thoughtful Evaluation Approach," 2020, published in PubMed Central
  • "Cardiopulmonary Activity Monitoring Using Millimeter Wave Radars," 2020, published in Remote Sensing
  • "Laryngeal Image Processing of Vocal Folds Motion," 2020, published in Applied Sciences
  • "On the design of automatic voice condition analysis systems. Part III: review of acoustic modelling strategies," 2021, published in Biomedical Signal Processing and Control

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Julián D. Arias-Londoño
  • Jorge A. Gómez-García
  • Laureano Moro-Velázquez
  • Alejandro Guerrero-López
  • Francisco Grandas-Pérez

Their work appears consistently in several notable publication venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
  • IEEE Access
  • Scientific Data
  • Data in Brief

Best Publications

  • Dimensionality Reduction of a Pathological Voice Quality Assessment System Based on Gaussian Mixture Models and Short-Term Cepstral Parameters

    J.I. Godino-Llorente;P. Gomez-Vilda;M. Blanco-Velasco

  • Automatic detection of voice impairments by means of short-term cepstral parameters and neural network based detectors

    J.I. Godino-Llorente;P. Gomez-Vilda

  • Methodological issues in the development of automatic systems for voice pathology detection

    Nicolás Sáenz-Lechón;Juan I. Godino-Llorente;Víctor Osma-Ruiz;Pedro Gómez-Vilda

  • Characterization of Healthy and Pathological Voice Through Measures Based on Nonlinear Dynamics

    P. Henriquez;J.B. Alonso;M.A. Ferrer;C.M. Travieso

  • Automatic Detection of Pathological Voices Using Complexity Measures, Noise Parameters, and Mel-Cepstral Coefficients

    J D Arias-Londoño;J I Godino-Llorente;N Sáenz-Lechón;V Osma-Ruiz

  • Glottal Source biometrical signature for voice pathology detection

    Pedro Gómez-Vilda;Roberto Fernández-Baillo;Victoria Rodellar-Biarge;Víctor Nieto Lluis

  • Advances in Parkinson's Disease detection and assessment using voice and speech: A review of the articulatory and phonatory aspects

    Laureano Moro-Velazquez;Jorge A. Gomez-Garcia;Julian D. Arias-Londoño;Najim Dehak

  • Cepstral peak prominence: A comprehensive analysis

    Rubén Fraile;Juan Ignacio Godino-Llorente

  • An improved watershed algorithm based on efficient computation of shortest paths

    Víctor Osma-Ruiz;Juan I. Godino-Llorente;Nicolás Sáenz-Lechón;Pedro Gómez-Vilda

  • Selection of Dynamic Features Based on Time–Frequency Representations for Heart Murmur Detection from Phonocardiographic Signals

    A. F. Quiceno-Manrique;J. I. Godino-Llorente;M. Blanco-Velasco;G. Castellanos-Dominguez

  • Digital auscultation analysis for heart murmur detection.

    Edilson Delgado-Trejos;A.F. Quiceno-Manrique;J.I. Godino-Llorente;M. Blanco-Velasco

  • The effectiveness of the glottal to noise excitation ratio for the screening of voice disorders.

    Juan Ignacio Godino-Llorente;Víctor Osma-Ruiz;Nicolás Sáenz-Lechón;Pedro Gómez-Vilda

  • ECG compression with retrieved quality guaranteed

    M. Blanco-Velasco;F. Cruz-Roldan;J.I. Godino-Llorente;K.E. Barner

  • On combining information from modulation spectra and mel-frequency cepstral coefficients for automatic detection of pathological voices

    Julián David Arias-Londoño;Juan I Godino-Llorente;Maria Markaki;Yannis Stylianou

  • Acoustic analysis of voice using WPCVox: a comparative study with Multi Dimensional Voice Program.

    Juan Ignacio Godino-Llorente;Víctor Osma-Ruiz;Nicolás Sáenz-Lechón;Ignacio Cobeta-Marco

  • Analysis of speaker recognition methodologies and the influence of kinetic changes to automatically detect Parkinson's Disease

    Laureano Moro-Velázquez;Jorge Andrés Gómez-García;Juan Ignacio Godino-Llorente;Jesús Villalba

  • Artificial Intelligence Applied to Chest X-Ray Images for the Automatic Detection of COVID-19. A Thoughtful Evaluation Approach

    Julian D. Arias-Londono;Jorge A. Gomez-Garcia;Laureano Moro-Velazquez;Juan I. Godino-Llorente

  • An improved method for voice pathology detection by means of a HMM-based feature space transformation

    Julián D. Arias-Londoño;Juan I. Godino-Llorente;Nicolás Sáenz-Lechón;Víctor Osma-Ruiz

  • Feature Extraction From Parametric Time–Frequency Representations for Heart Murmur Detection

    L. D. Avendaño-Valencia;J. I. Godino-Llorente;M. Blanco-Velasco;G. Castellanos-Dominguez

  • An integrated tool for the diagnosis of voice disorders

    Juan I. Godino-Llorente;Nicolás Sáenz-Lechón;Víctor Osma-Ruiz;Santiago Aguilera-Navarro

  • Automatic Detection of Pathological Voices Using Complexity Measures, Noise Parameters, and

    Mel-Cepstral Coefficients;Juan I. Godino-Llorente

Frequent Co-Authors

Najim Dehak
Najim Dehak Johns Hopkins University
Kenneth E. Barner
Kenneth E. Barner University of Delaware
Juan Rafael Orozco-Arroyave
Juan Rafael Orozco-Arroyave University of Antioquia
Yannis Stylianou
Yannis Stylianou University of Crete
Ignacio Santamaria
Ignacio Santamaria University of Cantabria
Miguel Ferrer
Miguel Ferrer University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Elmar Nöth
Elmar Nöth University of Erlangen-Nuremberg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Beyond Computer Science, many related online degrees can open doors to dynamic tech and engineering careers. Popular options include an online environmental engineering degree. This pathway combines computing with environmental problem-solving and can lead to roles in green technology and sustainable industries.

For those interested in innovation and design, pursuing a mechanical engineering degree can be a smart move. It’s important to consider mechanical engineering degree cost, as this can vary widely between programs—affecting your return on investment as you plan your educational finances.

Learners with a passion for fundamental science can benefit from an online theoretical physics degree. This area blends computational skills with advanced science, preparing graduates for careers in research, technology, or academia.

Lastly, as the demand continues to surge, data science degrees empower students to harness the power of big data. This field offers diverse career pathways in business, healthcare, and technology sectors.

Each of these pathways shares strong connections with computer science and provides flexible, online options for career growth in today’s digital world.

Best Scientists Citing Juan Ignacio Godino-Llorente

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles