World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
36
Citations
7407
World Ranking
8586
National Ranking
2374

Joan L. Walker publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joan L. Walker sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 110 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Joan L. Walker D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joan L. Walker sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Hybrid choice models : Progress and challenges

    Moshe Ben-Akiva;Daniel Mcfadden;Kenneth Train;Joan Walker

  • Generalized random utility model

    Joan L. Walker;Moshe E. Ben-Akiva

  • Extended discrete choice models : integrated framework, flexible error structures, and latent variables

    Joan Leslie Walker

  • Extended Framework for Modeling Choice Behavior

    Moshe Ben-Akiva;Denis Bolduc;Philippe Delquie;Tommy Gärling

  • Latent lifestyle preferences and household location decisions

    Joan L. Walker;Jieping Li

  • Moving from trip-based to activity-based measures of accessibility

    Xiaojing Dong;Moshe E. Ben-Akiva;John L. Bowman;Joan L. Walker

  • Incorporating the influence of latent modal preferences on travel mode choice behavior

    Akshay Vij;André Carrel;Joan L. Walker

  • Discrete choice with social and spatial network interdependencies: An empirical example using mixed generalized extreme value models with field and panel effects

    Elenna R. Dugundji;Joan L. Walker

  • Public transit use in the United States in the era of COVID-19: Transit riders’ travel behavior in the COVID-19 impact and recovery period

    Madeleine E.G. Parker;Meiqing Li;Mohamed Amine Bouzaghrane;Hassan Obeid

  • Projecting travelers into a world of self-driving vehicles: estimating travel behavior implications via a naturalistic experiment

    Mustapha Harb;Yu Xiao;Giovanni Circella;Patricia L. Mokhtarian

  • Quantified Traveler: Travel Feedback Meets the Cloud to Change Behavior

    Jerald Jariyasunant;Maya Abou-Zeid;Andre Carrel;Venkatesan N. Ekambaram

  • Modeling Private Car Ownership in China: Investigation of Urban Form Impact Across Megacities

    Jieping Li;Joan L. Walker;Sumeeta Srinivasan;William P. Anderson

  • Car ownership motivations among undergraduate students in China, Indonesia, Japan, Lebanon, Netherlands, Taiwan, and USA

    Prawira Fajarindra Belgiawan;Jan Dirk Schmöcker;Maya Abou-Zeid;Joan Walker

  • D-efficient or deficient? A robustness analysis of stated choice experimental designs

    Joan L. Walker;Yanqiao Wang;Mikkel Thorhauge;Moshe Ben-Akiva

  • Looking beyond the mean for equity analysis: Examining distributional impacts of transportation improvements

    Tierra S. Bills;Joan L. Walker

  • Passengers’ Perception of and Behavioral Adaptation to Unreliability in Public Transportation

    Andre Carrel;Anne Halvorsen;Joan L Walker

  • MIXED LOGIT (OR LOGIT KERNEL) MODEL: DISPELLING MISCONCEPTIONS OF IDENTIFICATION

    Joan Walker

  • The overreliance on statistical goodness-of-fit and under-reliance on model validation in discrete choice models: A review of validation practices in the transportation academic literature

    Giancarlos Parady;David Ory;Joan Walker

  • What do we (Not) know about our future with automated vehicles

    Mustapha Harb;Amanda Stathopoulos;Yoram Shiftan;Joan L. Walker

  • Transportation and social interactions

    Elenna R. Dugundji;Antonio Páez;Theo A. Arentze;Joan L. Walker

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Recently Published Articles