World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
43
Citations
9148
World Ranking
1679
National Ranking
726

Jayanta K. Ghosh publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jayanta K. Ghosh sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 236 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Jayanta K. Ghosh D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jayanta K. Ghosh sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jayanta K. Ghosh is affiliated with Purdue University West Lafayette in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily Medicine and Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with particular focus on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Modeling and Simulation, Plant Science, Genetics, and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics.

The main topics of Ghosh's work include Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models, COVID-19 epidemiological studies, Evolution and Genetic Dynamics, Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions, Plant Parasitism and Resistance, Plant chemical constituents analysis, and SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research.

Frequent coauthors in their publications include Uttam Ghosh, Susmita Sarkar, Mrinmoy Midday, Debabrata Maity, and Sudhanshu Kumar Biswas.

Ghosh has published multiple articles in well-known venues. The primary publication venues are:

  • Mathematics and Computers in Simulation
  • Pleione
  • Journal of Biological Systems
  • Preprints.org
  • Feddes Repertorium

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Ghosh include:

  • Mathematical modelling of COVID-19: A case study of Italy, 2021, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation
  • Qualitative analysis and optimal control of an SIR model with logistic growth, non-monotonic incidence and saturated treatment, 2021, Mathematical Modelling of Natural Phenomena
  • COVID-19 pandemic in India: a mathematical model study, 2020, Nonlinear Dynamics
  • Fractional abundances study of macronutrients in soil using hyperspectral remote sensing, 2020, Geocarto International
  • Bifurcation analysis of a two-dimensional predator-prey model with Holling type IV functional response and nonlinear predator harvesting, 2020, Journal of Biological Systems

Best Publications

  • Convergence rates of posterior distributions

    Subhashis Ghosal;Jayanta K. Ghosh;Aad W. van der Vaart

  • ON THE VALIDITY OF THE FORMAL EDGEWORTH EXPANSION

    R. N. Bhattacharya;J. K. Ghosh

  • An Introduction to Bayesian Analysis: Theory and Methods

    J. K. Ghosh;Mohan Delampady;Tapas Samanta

  • POSTERIOR CONSISTENCY OF DIRICHLET MIXTURES IN DENSITY ESTIMATION

    S. Ghosal;J. K. Ghosh;R. V. Ramamoorthi

  • AIC, BIC and Recent Advances in Model Selection

    Arijit Chakrabarti;Jayanta K. Ghosh

  • On the asymptotic performance of the log likelihood ratio statistic for the mixture model and related results

    J. K. Ghosh;Pranab Kumar Sen

  • A New Proof of the Bahadur Representation of Quantiles and an Application

    J. K. Ghosh

  • The Relationship Between Sufficiency and Invariance with Applications in Sequential Analysis

    William Jackson Hall;R. A. Wijsman;J. K. Ghosh

  • Modifying the Schwarz Bayesian Information Criterion to Locate Multiple Interacting Quantitative Trait Loci

    Małgorzata Bogdan;Małgorzata Bogdan;Jayanta K. Ghosh;Jayanta K. Ghosh;R. W. Doerge

  • Higher order asymptotics

    Jayanta Kumar Ghosh

  • On priors providing frequentist validity for Bayesian inference

    Gauri Sankar Daita;Jayanta Kumar Ghosh

  • A Decomposition for the Likelihood Ratio Statistic and the Bartlett Correction--A Bayesian Argument

    Peter J. Bickel;J. K. Ghosh

  • Identifiability of the multinormal and other distributions under competing risks model

    A.P Basu;A.P Basu;J.K Ghosh;J.K Ghosh

  • Asymptotic Bayes-optimality under sparsity of some multiple testing procedures

    Małgorzata Bogdan;Arijit Chakrabarti;Florian Frommlet;Jayanta K. Ghosh

  • Posterior consistency of logistic Gaussian process priors in density estimation

    Surya T. Tokdar;Jayanta K. Ghosh;Jayanta K. Ghosh

  • Valid asymptotic expansions for the likelihood ratio statistic and other perturbed chi-square variables

    Tapas K. Chandra;J. K. Ghosh

  • An Introduction to Bayesian Analysis

    Jayanta K. Ghosh;Tapas Samanta;Mohan Delampady

  • Asymptotic Properties of Bayes Risk for the Horseshoe Prior

    Jyotishka Datta;Jayanta. K. Ghosh

  • Approximations and consistency of Bayes factors as model dimension grows

    James O. Berger;Jayanta K. Ghosh;Jayanta K. Ghosh;Nitai Mukhopadhyay

  • Second order efficiency of maximum likelihood estimators

    J. K. Ghosh;K. Subramanyam

  • Latent Class and Latent Transition Analysis: With Applications in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences by Linda M. Collins, Stephanie T. Lanza

    Jayanta K. Ghosh

  • Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference, Second Edition by Judea Pearl

    Jayanta K. Ghosh

  • Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs, 2nd Edition by Finn V. Jensen, Thomas D. Nielsen

    Jayanta K. Ghosh

Frequent Co-Authors

Rahul Mukerjee
Rahul Mukerjee Indian Institute of Management Calcutta
Subhashis Ghosal
Subhashis Ghosal North Carolina State University
Pranab Kumar Sen
Pranab Kumar Sen University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Rebecca W. Doerge
Rebecca W. Doerge Carnegie Mellon University
Partha P. Majumder
Partha P. Majumder Indian Statistical Institute
Cindy H. Nakatsu
Cindy H. Nakatsu Purdue University West Lafayette
Rabi Bhattacharya
Rabi Bhattacharya University of Arizona
James O. Berger
James O. Berger Duke University
Dipak K. Dey
Dipak K. Dey University of Connecticut
Samuel Kotz
Samuel Kotz George Washington University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Mathematics opens doors to various advanced educational options and career pathways, including business, finance, and data analysis. For students interested in expanding their skills in leadership and management, finding the easiest MBA to get into can be a practical step. These programs offer manageable entry requirements while still delivering valuable business knowledge.

Online options add further flexibility. Those balancing work and study might appreciate the accessibility of the easiest online MBA program, which helps build essential managerial skills without on-campus constraints.

For professionals aiming to reach higher executive roles, advanced qualifications like a Doctor of Business Administration can be considered. Exploring the cheapest DBA online programs is a wise way to balance cost with career growth potential.

Additionally, students interested in the financial sector might seek out the cheapest masters in finance programs. These affordable options provide a strong foundation in financial theory and practice, complementing a mathematics background effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Jayanta K. Ghosh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles