World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
40
Citations
9037
World Ranking
7994
National Ranking
597

Janice L. Muir publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janice L. Muir sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 56 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Janice L. Muir D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janice L. Muir sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Janice L. Muir is affiliated with Cardiff University in the United Kingdom. Their academic profile reflects involvement primarily in research associated with this institution.

The scientist's record does not currently include published papers, frequent co-authors, or specific publication venues from which to infer patterns in research collaboration or dissemination.

There are no documented main fields or subfields of study attributed to Janice L. Muir based on the available data. Similarly, there are no specified main topics of work to outline the thematic focus of their research activities.

There is no information on book publications or awards received by this scholar, and the data does not indicate any notable distinctions or honors received during their career.

This profile remains limited to foundational professional and institutional details without further specifics on research contributions or scholarly output at this time.

Best Publications

  • The Cerebral Cortex of the Rat and Visual Attentional Function: Dissociable Effects of Mediofrontal, Cingulate, Anterior Dorsolateral, and Parietal Cortex Lesions on a Five-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task

    Janice L. Muir;Barry J. Everitt;Trevor W. Robbins

  • The Role of the Nucleus Accumbens in Instrumental Conditioning: Evidence of a Functional Dissociation between Accumbens Core and Shell

    Laura H. Corbit;Janice L. Muir;Bernard W. Balleine

  • AMPA-induced excitotoxic lesions of the basal forebrain: a significant role for the cortical cholinergic system in attentional function

    JL Muir;BJ Everitt;TW Robbins

  • Acetylcholine, aging, and Alzheimer's disease.

    Janice L Muir

  • 6-Hydroxydopamine lesions of the prefrontal cortex in monkeys enhance performance on an analog of the Wisconsin Card Sort Test: possible interactions with subcortical dopamine.

    A. C. Roberts;M. A. De Salvia;Lawrence Stephen Wilkinson;P. Collins

  • Attentional functions of the forebrain cholinergic systems: effects of intraventricular hemicholinium, physostigmine, basal forebrain lesions and intracortical grafts on a multiple-choice serial reaction time task.

    J. L. Muir;S. B. Dunnett;T. W. Robbins;B. J. Everitt

  • Triple dissociation of anterior cingulate, posterior cingulate, and medial frontal cortices on visual discrimination tasks using a touchscreen testing procedure for the rat.

    Timothy J. Bussey;Janice L. Muir;Barry J. Everitt;Trevor W. Robbins

  • Functionally Dissociating Aspects of Event Memory: the Effects of Combined Perirhinal and Postrhinal Cortex Lesions on Object and Place Memory in the Rat

    Timothy J. Bussey;Janice L. Muir;John P. Aggleton

  • Reversal of visual attentional dysfunction following lesions of the cholinergic basal forebrain by physostigmine and nicotine but not by the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, ondansetron.

    Barry J. Everitt;Trevor W. Robbins;Janice L. Muir

  • Distinct patterns of behavioural impairments resulting from fornix transection or neurotoxic lesions of the perirhinal and postrhinal cortices in the rat.

    Timothy J. Bussey;Janette Duck;Janice L. Muir;John Patrick Aggleton

  • Excitotoxic lesions of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons: effects on learning, memory and attention.

    Janice L. Muir;Keith J. Page;D.J.S. Sirinathsinghji;Trevor W. Robbins

  • The Conjoint Importance of the Hippocampus and Anterior Thalamic Nuclei for Allocentric Spatial Learning: Evidence from a Disconnection Study in the Rat

    E. Clea Warburton;Alison Baird;Angela Morgan;Janice L. Muir

  • Lesions of mediodorsal thalamus and anterior thalamic nuclei produce dissociable effects on instrumental conditioning in rats.

    Laura H. Corbit;Janice L. Muir;Bernard W. Balleine

  • Cyclical changes in endogenous levels of oestrogen modulate the induction of LTD and LTP in the hippocampal CA1 region.

    Mark Andrew Good;Mark Day;Janice L. Muir

  • Neural Systems Underlying Arousal and Attention: Implications for Drug Abusea.

    T. W. Robbins;S. Granon;J. L. Muir;F. Durantou

  • A behavioural analysis of the delayed non-matching to position task: the effects of scopolamine, lesions of the fornix and of the prelimbic region on mediating behaviours by rats

    Yogita Chudasama;Janice L. Muir

  • Dissociable effects of anterior and posterior cingulate cortex lesions on the acquisition of a conditional visual discrimination: Facilitation of early learning vs. impairment of late learning

    Timothy J. Bussey;Janice L. Muir;Barry J. Everitt;Trevor W. Robbins

  • Effects of selective thalamic and prelimbic cortex lesions on two types of visual discrimination and reversal learning.

    Yogita Chudasama;Timothy J. Bussey;Janice L. Muir

  • A specific form of cognitive rigidity following excitotoxic lesions of the basal forebrain in marmosets.

    A.C. Roberts;T.W. Robbins;B.J. Everitt;J.L. Muir

  • Disconnecting hippocampal projections to the anterior thalamus produces deficits on tests of spatial memory in rats.

    E. C. Warburton;Alison Lambie Baird;A. Morgan;Janice L. Muir

Frequent Co-Authors

Trevor W. Robbins
Trevor W. Robbins University of Cambridge
Barry J. Everitt
Barry J. Everitt University of Cambridge
John Patrick Aggleton
John Patrick Aggleton Cardiff University
Timothy J. Bussey
Timothy J. Bussey University of Western Ontario
Robert Jefferson Snowden
Robert Jefferson Snowden Cardiff University
Angela C. Roberts
Angela C. Roberts University of Cambridge
Lawrence Stephen Wilkinson
Lawrence Stephen Wilkinson Cardiff University
Stephen B. Dunnett
Stephen B. Dunnett Cardiff University
Seralynne Denise Vann
Seralynne Denise Vann Cardiff University
Robert Colin Honey
Robert Colin Honey Cardiff University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Janice L. Muir

Recently Published Articles