World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
34
Citations
6044
World Ranking
9288
National Ranking
3925

James N. Davis publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James N. Davis sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 81 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

James N. Davis D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James N. Davis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

James N. Davis is affiliated with Duke University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of computer science, with a particular focus on software engineering and related areas. Their work spans across several main fields and subfields, emphasizing a diverse range of topics.

The primary fields of study in their research include:

  • Computer Science

Within this broad domain, their subfields of study focus on:

  • Information Systems
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Software
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

The main topics covered in their research portfolio comprise:

  • Software Engineering Research
  • Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
  • Information and Cyber Security
  • Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques

James N. Davis has published significant work in a variety of venues, frequently contributing to:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Empirical Software Engineering
  • Journal of Systems and Software
  • Proceedings of the 30th ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering

Recent publications demonstrate a variety of research themes, including transparency in data science pipelines, software testing, computer vision on edge devices, and deep learning model reengineering. Selected papers include:

  • Improving reproducibility of data science pipelines through transparent provenance capture, 2020, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
  • Fast and accurate incremental feedback for students' software tests using selective mutation analysis, 2021, Journal of Systems and Software
  • Efficient Computer Vision on Edge Devices with Pipeline-Parallel Hierarchical Neural Networks, 2022, 2022 27th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC)
  • Challenges and practices of deep learning model reengineering: A case study on computer vision, 2024, Empirical Software Engineering
  • Exploiting input sanitization for regex denial of service, 2022, Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering

The researcher collaborates frequently with various coauthors, including:

  • George K. Thiruvathukal
  • Wenxin Jiang
  • Dharun Anandayuvaraj
  • Yung-Hsiang Lu
  • Taylor R. Schorlemmer

Best Publications

  • Interrater Reliability of the NIH Stroke Scale

    Larry B. Goldstein;Christina Bertels;James N. Davis

  • Evidence that amphetamine with physical therapy promotes recovery of motor function in stroke patients.

    Edgardo A. Crisostomo;Pamela W. Duncan;Martha Propst;Deborah V. Dawson

  • Anatomy of brain alpha1‐adrenergic receptors: In vitro autoradiography with [125I]‐heat

    Leslie Sargent Jones;Lisa L. Gauger;Lisa L. Gauger;James N. Davis;James N. Davis

  • Beam-walking in rats: studies towards developing an animal model of functional recovery after brain injury.

    Larry B. Goldstein;James N. Davis

  • Lymph nodes—A possible site for sympathetic neuronal regulation of immune responses

    Louis T. Giron;Keith A. Crutcher;James N. Davis

  • Binding of α- and β-adrenergic ligands to cerebral cortical membranes: Effect of 6-hydroxydopamine treatment and relationship to the responsiveness of cyclic AMP-generating systems in two rat strains

    Phil Skolnick;Linda P. Stalvey;John W. Daly;Elizabeth Hoyler

  • Sympathetic noradrenergic sprouting in response to central cholinergic denervation: A histochemical study of neuronal sprouting in the rat hippocampal formation

    Keith A. Crutcher;James N. Davis

  • Regulation of ischemic hippocampal damage in the gerbil: Adrenalectomy alters the rate of CA1 cell disappearance

    Joanne K. Morse;James N. Davis

  • BCL-2 transduction, using a herpes simplex virus amplicon, protects hippocampal neurons from transient global ischemia.

    Francis J. Antonawich;Howard J. Federoff;James N. Davis

  • Sprouting of sympathetic nerves in the absence of afferent input

    Keith A. Crutcher;Keith A. Crutcher;James N. Davis;James N. Davis

  • A study of the rat septohippocampal pathway using anterograde transport of horseradish peroxidase.

    K.A. Crutcher;R. Madison;J.N. Davis

  • alpha-Adrenergic receptors in rat parotid cells. II. Desensitization of receptor binding sites and potassium release.

    W J Strittmatter;J N Davis;R J Lefkowitz

  • Influence of lesion size and location on amphetamine-facilitated recovery of beam-walking in rats.

    Larry B. Goldstein;James N. Davis

  • Clonidine impairs recovery of beam-walking after a sensorimotor cortex lesion in the rat.

    Larry B. Goldstein;James N. Davis

  • Differential distribution of locus coeruleus projections to the hippocampal formation: anatomical and biochemical evidence

    John H. Haring;John H. Haring;James N. Davis;James N. Davis

  • Chronic estrogen treatment decreases ß-adrenergic responses in rat cerebral cortex

    H. Ryan Wagner;H. Ryan Wagner;Keith A. Crutcher;Keith A. Crutcher;James N. Davis;James N. Davis

  • Sympathetic noradrenergic sprouting in response to central cholinergic denervation

    Keith A. Crutcher;James N. Davis

  • Post-lesion practice and amphetamine-facilitated recovery of beam-walking in the rat.

    Larry B. Goldstein;Larry B. Goldstein;James N. Davis

  • alpha-Adrenergic receptors in rat parotid cells. I. Correlation of [3H]dihydroergocryptine binding and catecholamine-stimulated potassium efflux.

    W J Strittmatter;J N Davis;R J Lefkowitz

  • Catecholaminergic innervation of the hippocampus in the cynomolgus monkey.

    Yves Samson;Justin J. Wu;Allan H. Friedman;James N. Davis

Frequent Co-Authors

Keith A. Crutcher
Keith A. Crutcher University of Cincinnati
Larry B. Goldstein
Larry B. Goldstein University of Kentucky
Roger D. Madison
Roger D. Madison Duke University
Robert J. Lefkowitz
Robert J. Lefkowitz Duke University
Rosemarie M. Booze
Rosemarie M. Booze University of South Carolina
Warren J. Strittmatter
Warren J. Strittmatter Duke University
Allan H. Friedman
Allan H. Friedman Duke University
Yves Samson
Yves Samson Université Paris Cité
Phil Skolnick
Phil Skolnick Opiant Pharmaceuticals
John W. Daly
John W. Daly National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing James N. Davis

Recently Published Articles