World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
77
Citations
41414
World Ranking
1797
National Ranking
24

Jaime Kulisevsky publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jaime Kulisevsky sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 477 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jaime Kulisevsky D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jaime Kulisevsky sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jaime Kulisevsky is affiliated with the Autonomous University of Barcelona in Spain and has an extensive research portfolio focusing primarily on neurology and neuroscience.

Their main fields of study include Medicine and Neuroscience, with a specific emphasis on subfields such as Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

Research topics covered by Jaime Kulisevsky include:

  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
  • Restless Legs Syndrome Research
  • Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Recent publications highlight their involvement in Parkinson's disease and neurological assessment. Notable works include:

  • "Trial of Deferiprone in Parkinson's Disease" (2022), published in New England Journal of Medicine
  • "Diagnostic criteria for mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease: Movement Disorder Society Task Force guidelines" (2020), published by UNC Libraries
  • "The reliability of a deep learning model in clinical out-of-distribution MRI data: A multicohort study" (2020), published in Medical Image Analysis
  • "Serum neurofilament light chain levels reflect cortical neurodegeneration in de novo Parkinson's disease" (2020), published in Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
  • "Understanding visual hallucinations: A new synthesis" (2023), published in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Several frequent co-authors collaborate on research with Jaime Kulisevsky, including Javier Pagonabarraga, Saül Martínez-Horta, Andrea Horta-Barba, Jesús Pérez-Pérez, and Diego Santos-García.

The scholar's research is frequently published in venues such as Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, Journal of Neurology, Movement Disorders Clinical Practice, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and Neurology Perspectives.

Best Publications

  • Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): scale presentation and clinimetric testing results.

    Christopher G. Goetz;Barbara C. Tilley;Stephanie R. Shaftman;Glenn T. Stebbins

  • Diagnostic Criteria for Mild Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson’s Disease: Movement Disorder Society Task Force Guidelines

    Irene Litvan;Jennifer G. Goldman;Alexander I. Tröster;Ben A. Schmand

  • Identification of novel risk loci, causal insights, and heritable risk for Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies

    Mike A Nalls;Cornelis Blauwendraat;Costanza L Vallerga;Karl Heilbron

  • Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): Process, format, and clinimetric testing plan.

    Christopher G. Goetz;Stanley Fahn;Pablo Martinez-Martin;Werner Poewe

  • Overdependence on degraded gist memory in Alzheimer's disease.

    David A. Gallo;Kameron R. Shahid;Meredith A. Olson;Todd M. Solomon

  • Bilateral deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: a multicentre study with 4 years follow-up

    M C Rodriguez-Oroz;J A Obeso;A E Lang;J L Houeto

  • Mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson disease: a multicenter pooled analysis.

    D. Aarsland;K. Bronnick;C. Williams-Gray;D. Weintraub

  • MDS Task Force on Mild Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson’s disease: Critical Review of PD-MCI

    Irene Litvan;Dag Aarsland;Charles H. Adler;Jennifer G. Goldman

  • EFNS/MDS‐ES recommendations for the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease

    Alfredo Berardelli;Gregor Wenning;Angelo Antonini;Daniela Berg

  • Apathy in Parkinson's disease: clinical features, neural substrates, diagnosis, and treatment

    Javier Pagonabarraga;Jaime Kulisevsky;Antonio P Strafella;Antonio P Strafella;Paul Krack;Paul Krack

  • Long-term results of a multicenter study on subthalamic and pallidal stimulation in Parkinson's disease.

    Elena Moro;Andres M. Lozano;Pierre Pollak;Yves Agid

  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of depression. Systematic review and meta-analysis.

    José Luis R. Martin;Manuel J. Barbanoj;Thomas E. Schlaepfer;Elinor Thompson

  • Parkinson's disease-cognitive rating scale: a new cognitive scale specific for Parkinson's disease.

    Javier Pagonabarraga;Jaime Kulisevsky;Gisela Llebaria;Carmen García-Sánchez

  • Rey verbal learning test is a useful tool for differential diagnosis in the preclinical phase of Alzheimer's disease: comparison with mild cognitive impairment and normal aging.

    Armando Estévez-González;Armando Estévez-González;Jaime Kulisevsky;Anunciación Boltes;Pilar Otermín

  • Cognitive impairment and dementia in Parkinson's disease.

    Javier Pagonabarraga;Jaime Kulisevsky;Jaime Kulisevsky

  • Mania following deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease

    J. Kulisevsky;M. L. Berthier;A. Gironell;B. Pascual-Sedano

  • Penetrance of FMR1 premutation associated pathologies in fragile X syndrome families.

    Laia Rodriguez-Revenga;Irene Madrigal;Javier Pagonabarraga;Mar Xunclà

  • Prevalence and correlates of neuropsychiatric symptoms in Parkinson's disease without dementia

    Jaime Kulisevsky;Javier Pagonabarraga;Berta Pascual‐Sedano;Carmen García‐Sánchez

  • Parkinson's disease is overdiagnosed clinically at baseline in diagnostically uncertain cases: a 3-year European multicenter study with repeat [123I]FP-CIT SPECT.

    Vicky L. Marshall;Cornelia B. Reininger;Moritz Marquardt;Jim Patterson

  • Role of dopamine in learning and memory: implications for the treatment of cognitive dysfunction in patients with Parkinson's disease.

    Jaime Kulisevsky

  • Obsessive-compulsive disorder associated with brain lesions Clinical phenomenology, cognitive function, and anatomic correlates

    Marcelo L. Berthier;Jaime Kulisevsky;Alex Gironell;Jose A. Heras

  • A randomized placebo-controlled comparative trial of gabapentin and propranolol in essential tremor

    Alexandre Gironell;Jaime Kulisevsky;Manel Barbanoj;Dolores López-Villegas

  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation for treating depression

    José Luis Rodriguez‐Martin;José Manuel Barbanoj;TE Schlaepfer;Susana Sc Clos

  • Cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease: tools for diagnosis and assessment.

    Jaime Kulisevsky;Javier Pagonabarraga

  • Chronic effects of dopaminergic replacement on cognitive function in Parkinson's disease: a two-year follow-up study of previously untreated patients.

    Jaime Kulisevsky;Carmen García‐Sánchez;Marcelo L. Berthier;Manel Barbanoj

Frequent Co-Authors

Javier Pagonabarraga
Javier Pagonabarraga Autonomous University of Barcelona
Alexandre Gironell
Alexandre Gironell Creu Blanca Clinic
Marcelo L. Berthier
Marcelo L. Berthier University of Malaga
Jesús Pujol
Jesús Pujol Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Werner Poewe
Werner Poewe Innsbruck Medical University
Francesc Valldeoriola
Francesc Valldeoriola University of Barcelona
Paul Krack
Paul Krack University of Bern
Dag Aarsland
Dag Aarsland King's College London
Joseph Jankovic
Joseph Jankovic Baylor College of Medicine
Joan Deus
Joan Deus Autonomous University of Barcelona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your neuroscience education can open many doors in mental health, research, and allied fields. Today, online degree options provide flexibility for students balancing work or family commitments. If you’re considering a clinical or counseling role, msw programs online are a popular choice. These programs focus on social work and prepare graduates for service in a variety of settings.

For those interested in behavioral interventions and working with individuals with developmental disorders, online bcba programs offer a pathway to becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst. Many neuroscience students also consider accelerated options to finish their degrees quickly. If you don’t have a background in social work, accelerated msw programs without bsw provide a faster route into the field.

Interested in a psychology career? There are numerous colleges with accelerated psychology programs that allow you to fast-track your studies online. Each of these pathways can complement your neuroscience interests and unlock exciting career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Jaime Kulisevsky

Trending Scientists