World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
52
Citations
9599
World Ranking
5336
National Ranking
2378

Ilya A. Rybak publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ilya A. Rybak sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 173 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Ilya A. Rybak D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ilya A. Rybak sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ilya A. Rybak is affiliated with Drexel University in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines including Medicine, Neuroscience, and Engineering, with a notable focus on subfields such as Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Cell Biology, Small Animals, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

The scientist has concentrated on key topics including Spinal Cord Injury Research, Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications, Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology, Robotic Locomotion and Control, Muscle activation and electromyography studies, Neuroscience of respiration and sleep, and Motor Control and Adaptation.

Recent publications by Ilya A. Rybak include:

  • "The role of V3 neurons in speed-dependent interlimb coordination during locomotion in mice" (2022, eLife)
  • "A Whole-Body Musculoskeletal Model of the Mouse" (2021, IEEE Access)
  • "Modulation of the gait pattern during split-belt locomotion after lateral spinal cord hemisection in adult cats" (2022, Journal of Neurophysiology)
  • "Sensory Perturbations from Hindlimb Cutaneous Afferents Generate Coordinated Functional Responses in All Four Limbs during Locomotion in Intact Cats" (2022, eNeuro)
  • "On the Organization of the Locomotor CPG: Insights From Split-Belt Locomotion and Mathematical Modeling" (2020, Frontiers in Neuroscience)

Their frequent coauthors are:

  • Alain Frigon
  • Boris I. Prilutsky
  • Johannie Audet
  • Natalia A. Shevtsova
  • Charly G. Lecomte

Publications have appeared predominantly in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), eLife, The Journal of Physiology, Journal of Neurophysiology, and eNeuro.

Best Publications

  • Organization of mammalian locomotor rhythm and pattern generation.

    David A. McCrea;Ilya A. Rybak

  • Modelling spinal circuitry involved in locomotor pattern generation: insights from deletions during fictive locomotion

    Ilya A. Rybak;Natalia A. Shevtsova;Natalia A. Shevtsova;Myriam Lafreniere-Roula;David A. McCrea

  • Spatial and functional architecture of the mammalian brain stem respiratory network: a hierarchy of three oscillatory mechanisms.

    Jeffrey C Smith;Ana A.P.L. Abdala;Hidehiko Koizumi;Ilya A Rybak

  • Brainstem respiratory networks: building blocks and microcircuits

    Jeffrey C. Smith;Ana P.L. Abdala;Anke Borgmann;Ilya A. Rybak

  • Structural and functional architecture of respiratory networks in the mammalian brainstem

    Jeffrey C Smith;Ana Paula Abdala;Ilya A Rybak;Julian F R Paton

  • A model of attention-guided visual perception and recognition

    I.A. Rybak;V.I. Gusakova;A.V. Golovan;L.N. Podladchikova

  • Modelling spinal circuitry involved in locomotor pattern generation: insights from the effects of afferent stimulation

    Ilya A. Rybak;Katinka Stecina;Natalia A. Shevtsova;Natalia A. Shevtsova;David A. McCrea

  • Modeling the ponto-medullary respiratory network.

    I. A. Rybak;N. A. Shevtsova;N. A. Shevtsova;J. F R Paton;Thomas E Dick

  • Abdominal expiratory activity in the rat brainstem-spinal cord in situ: patterns, origins and implications for respiratory rhythm generation.

    A. P. L. Abdala;I. A. Rybak;J. C. Smith;J. F. R. Paton

  • Spatial organization and state-dependent mechanisms for respiratory rhythm and pattern generation

    Ilya A Rybak;Ana Paula Abdala;Sergey N Markin;Julian F R Paton

  • Modeling Neural Mechanisms for Genesis of Respiratory Rhythm and Pattern. II. Network Models of the Central Respiratory Pattern Generator

    Ilya A. Rybak;Julian F. R. Paton;James S. Schwaber

  • Neuronal activity in the isolated mouse spinal cord during spontaneous deletions in fictive locomotion: insights into locomotor central pattern generator organization

    Guisheng Zhong;Natalia A. Shevtsova;Ilya A. Rybak;Ronald M. Harris-Warrick

  • Organization of the Mammalian Locomotor CPG: Review of Computational Model and Circuit Architectures Based on Genetically Identified Spinal Interneurons(1,2,3).

    Ilya A. Rybak;Kimberly J. Dougherty;Natalia A. Shevtsova

  • Multiple Rhythmic States in a Model of the Respiratory Central Pattern Generator

    Jonathan E. Rubin;Natalia A. Shevtsova;G. Bard Ermentrout;Jeffrey C. Smith

  • Endogenous rhythm generation in the pre-Bötzinger complex and ionic currents: modelling and in vitro studies.

    Ilya A. Rybak;Natalia A. Shevtsova;Walter M. St-John;Julian F. R. Paton

  • Computational Models and Emergent Properties of Respiratory Neural Networks

    Bruce G. Lindsey;Ilya A. Rybak;Jeffrey C. Smith

  • Modeling the spinal cord neural circuitry controlling cat hindlimb movement during locomotion

    Dmitry G. Ivashko;Boris I. Prilutsky;Sergey N. Markin;John K. Chapin

  • Respiratory Rhythm Entrainment by Somatic Afferent Stimulation

    Jeffrey T. Potts;Ilya A. Rybak;Julian F. R. Paton

  • Modeling the mammalian locomotor CPG: insights from mistakes and perturbations.

    David A. McCrea;Ilya A. Rybak

  • Computational modeling of spinal circuits controlling limb coordination and gaits in quadrupeds

    Simon M Danner;Natalia A Shevtsova;Alain Frigon;Ilya A Rybak

  • Control of oscillation periods and phase durations in half-center central pattern generators: a comparative mechanistic analysis

    Silvia Daun;Jonathan E. Rubin;Ilya A. Rybak

Frequent Co-Authors

Natalia A. Shevtsova
Natalia A. Shevtsova Drexel University
Julian F. R. Paton
Julian F. R. Paton University of Auckland
Jeffrey C. Smith
Jeffrey C. Smith National Institutes of Health
Jonathan E. Rubin
Jonathan E. Rubin University of Pittsburgh
James S. Schwaber
James S. Schwaber Thomas Jefferson University
Alain Frigon
Alain Frigon Université de Sherbrooke
Bruce G. Lindsey
Bruce G. Lindsey University of South Florida
Gaute T. Einevoll
Gaute T. Einevoll Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Ronald M. Harris-Warrick
Ronald M. Harris-Warrick Cornell University
D A McCrea
D A McCrea University of Manitoba

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience often opens doors to a wide array of rewarding careers and flexible education options. Many students now look for pathways that combine strong earning potential with the convenience of distance learning. For those interested in quick, job-ready qualifications, consider reviewing online certificate programs that pay well. These can help you start working or enhance your resume in as little as a few months.

For a broader academic experience, students may also investigate easy bachelor degrees online. These programs can provide a solid foundation and are often more accessible for those balancing other commitments such as work or family.

If your interests in neuroscience lean towards clinical or behavioral fields, graduate-level credentials may be key. Options such as an msw degree (Master of Social Work) allow you to engage in mental health practice, research, and community support. Alternatively, specialized certification like the bcba certification online is ideal if you’re interested in behavioral analysis and therapy, often pursued by those working with neurodiverse populations.

Online programs offer multiple pathways to new careers or further specialization, with options suited for diverse strengths, backgrounds, and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Ilya A. Rybak

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles