World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 68 2383 2266 1072 1009 184 43398

Hikmet Budak publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Hikmet Budak between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Hikmet Budak published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 9.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2015. 6 of the 213 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2015. 2003: 3 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 4 publications
2003 2025

213 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Hikmet Budak: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 3
2004 10
2005 7
2006 6
2007 4
2008 6
2009 17
2010 11
2011 9
2012 5
2013 8
2014 14
2015 19
2016 6
2017 17
2018 15
2019 10
2020 10
2021 15
2022 11
2023 4
2024 2
2025 4
Total 213
Download as CSV

Hikmet Budak publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hikmet Budak sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 175–184 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 184 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178 184
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Hikmet Budak D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hikmet Budak sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164 68
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Hikmet Budak is affiliated with Montana BioAg in the United States and has an extensive record of contributions in the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences as well as Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Their research is primarily focused on Plant Science, with significant work also in Molecular Biology, Genetics, Cancer Research, and Materials Chemistry.

The scientist's work spans several important topics in plant genetics and pathology, including:

  • Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
  • Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics
  • Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
  • Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research

Hikmet Budak has published research in a variety of scientific journals, with frequent contributions to:

  • Frontiers in Plant Science
  • Functional & Integrative Genomics
  • Scientific Reports
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Their notable recent papers include:

  • "Long Non-coding RNA in Plants in the Era of Reference Sequences," 2020, Frontiers in Plant Science
  • "Multiple wheat genomes reveal global variation in modern breeding," 2020, Nature
  • "The barley pan-genome reveals the hidden legacy of mutation breeding," 2020, Nature
  • "Chromosome-scale genome assembly provides insights into rye biology, evolution and agronomic potential," 2021, Nature Genetics
  • "CRISPR/Cas: a Nobel Prize award-winning precise genome editing technology for gene therapy and crop improvement," 2021, Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B

Frequent co-authors in their collaborative work include H. Busra Cagirici, Bala Anı Akpınar, Taner Z. Sen, Tuğdem Muslu, and Babar Hussain. The intensity of collaboration ranges with these individuals from 6 to 9 joint publications.

Hikmet Budak's research contributions encompass a diverse range of molecular genetics topics within plant science, reflecting their engagement in genetic mapping, disease resistance, and genomic studies to understand plant biology and breeding.

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz;Sara Abdelfatah;Mahmoud Abdellatif

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Shifting the limits in wheat research and breeding using a fully annotated reference genome

    Rudi Appels;Rudi Appels;Kellye Eversole;Nils Stein;Nils Stein

  • A chromosome-based draft sequence of the hexaploid bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) genome

    Klaus F. X. Mayer;Jane Rogers;Jaroslav Doležel

  • Genome sequencing and analysis of the model grass Brachypodium distachyon

    John P. Vogel;David F. Garvin;Todd C. Mockler;Jeremy Schmutz

  • Multiple wheat genomes reveal global variation in modern breeding.

    Sean Walkowiak;Sean Walkowiak;Liangliang Gao;Cecile Monat;Georg Haberer

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Wild emmer genome architecture and diversity elucidate wheat evolution and domestication

    Raz Avni;Moran Nave;Omer Barad;Kobi Baruch

  • Durum wheat genome highlights past domestication signatures and future improvement targets

    Marco Maccaferri;Marco Maccaferri;Neil S. Harris;Sven O. Twardziok;Raj K. Pasam

  • The barley pan-genome reveals the hidden legacy of mutation breeding.

    Murukarthick Jayakodi;Sudharsan Padmarasu;Georg Haberer;Venkata Suresh Bonthala

  • Molecular characterization of Buffalograss germplasm using sequence-related amplified polymorphism markers.

    Budak H;Shearman Rc;Parmaksiz I;Gaussoin Re

  • Comparative analysis of seeded and vegetative biotype buffalograsses based on phylogenetic relationship using ISSRs, SSRs, RAPDs, and SRAPs.

    H. Budak;R. C. Shearman;I. Parmaksiz;I. Dweikat

  • miRNA expression patterns of Triticum dicoccoides in response to shock drought stress

    Melda Kantar;Stuart J. Lucas;Hikmet Budak

  • Multiple QTL‐effects of wheat Gpc‐B1 locus on grain protein and micronutrient concentrations

    Assaf Distelfeld;Ismail Cakmak;Zvi Peleg;Zvi Peleg;Levent Ozturk

  • Quantitative trait loci conferring grain mineral nutrient concentrations in durum wheat × wild emmer wheat RIL population

    Zvi Peleg;İsmail Çakmak;Levent Öztürk;M. Atilla Yazıcı

  • Megabase Level Sequencing Reveals Contrasted Organization and Evolution Patterns of the Wheat Gene and Transposable Element Spaces

    Frédéric Choulet;Thomas Wicker;Camille Rustenholz;Etienne Paux

  • Brachypodium as a Model for the Grasses: Today and the Future

    Jelena Brkljacic;Erich Grotewold;Randy Scholl;Todd C. Mockler

  • Extensive gene content variation in the Brachypodium distachyon pan-genome correlates with population structure

    Sean P. Gordon;Bruno Contreras-Moreira;Daniel P. Woods;Daniel P. Woods;David L. Des Marais;David L. Des Marais

  • CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in wheat.

    Dongjin Kim;Burcu Alptekin;Hikmet Budak

  • Regulation of barley miRNAs upon dehydration stress correlated with target gene expression

    Melda Kantar;Turgay Unver;Hikmet Budak

Frequent Co-Authors

Nils Stein
Nils Stein University of Western Australia
Jaroslav Doležel
Jaroslav Doležel Czech Academy of Sciences
Klaus F. X. Mayer
Klaus F. X. Mayer Technical University of Munich
Rudi Appels
Rudi Appels University of Melbourne
Ismail M. Dweikat
Ismail M. Dweikat University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Tzion Fahima
Tzion Fahima University of Haifa
Manuel Spannagl
Manuel Spannagl Helmholtz Zentrum München
Heidrun Gundlach
Heidrun Gundlach Helmholtz Zentrum München
Hana Šimková
Hana Šimková Czech Academy of Sciences
Levent Ozturk
Levent Ozturk Sabancı University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in Genetics, there are several related online degrees that can expand your career options in healthcare and biomedical fields. Many genetics graduates consider advancing into specialized nursing or healthcare roles, where knowledge in biology and patient care is crucial.

For those looking for an advanced clinical role, online np programs can be a strategic next step. Nursing is a popular pathway for science graduates, and there are numerous online nursing degree programs designed to fit busy schedules or those transitioning from other disciplines.

If you're aiming for leadership or research-intensive positions within the healthcare system, exploring the cheapest online dnp programs may be worthwhile. Similarly, registered nurses wishing to build on their credentials may be interested in the cheapest rn to bsn program online.

These pathways offer flexibility and diverse professional outcomes, allowing students with a genetics background to move seamlessly into careers that blend science, research, and patient care.

Best Scientists Citing Hikmet Budak

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles