| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences and Humanities | 44 | 3960 | 1878 | 111 | 65283 |
The chart shows the history of publications by George H. Mead between 1956 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. George H. Mead published across 66 years, from 1956 to 2021, averaging 1 paper a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2017. 2 of the 64 publications appeared in the last two years.
64 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1956 | 1 |
| 1957 | 0 |
| 1958 | 0 |
| 1959 | 1 |
| 1960 | 0 |
| 1961 | 0 |
| 1962 | 0 |
| 1963 | 1 |
| 1964 | 4 |
| 1965 | 0 |
| 1966 | 0 |
| 1967 | 2 |
| 1968 | 0 |
| 1969 | 1 |
| 1970 | 1 |
| 1971 | 0 |
| 1972 | 0 |
| 1973 | 2 |
| 1974 | 0 |
| 1975 | 0 |
| 1976 | 0 |
| 1977 | 0 |
| 1978 | 2 |
| 1979 | 2 |
| 1980 | 1 |
| 1981 | 0 |
| 1982 | 3 |
| 1983 | 1 |
| 1984 | 0 |
| 1985 | 1 |
| 1986 | 0 |
| 1987 | 0 |
| 1988 | 0 |
| 1989 | 0 |
| 1990 | 0 |
| 1991 | 1 |
| 1992 | 1 |
| 1993 | 0 |
| 1994 | 0 |
| 1995 | 0 |
| 1996 | 0 |
| 1997 | 0 |
| 1998 | 0 |
| 1999 | 1 |
| 2000 | 1 |
| 2001 | 3 |
| 2002 | 0 |
| 2003 | 0 |
| 2004 | 1 |
| 2005 | 0 |
| 2006 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0 |
| 2008 | 5 |
| 2009 | 1 |
| 2010 | 1 |
| 2011 | 2 |
| 2012 | 0 |
| 2013 | 5 |
| 2014 | 1 |
| 2015 | 1 |
| 2016 | 2 |
| 2017 | 13 |
| 2018 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0 |
| 2020 | 1 |
| 2021 | 1 |
| Total | 64 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George H. Mead sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 111 publications — 19th percentile
19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 44–53 | 28 | |
| 54–63 | 61 | |
| 64–73 | 161 | |
| 74–83 | 225 | |
| 84–93 | 301 | |
| 94–103 | 390 | |
| 104–113 | 406 | 111 |
| 114–123 | 474 | |
| 124–133 | 453 | |
| 134–143 | 434 | |
| 144–153 | 407 | |
| 154–163 | 411 | |
| 164–173 | 391 | |
| 174–183 | 313 | |
| 184–193 | 319 | |
| 194–203 | 304 | |
| 204–213 | 285 | |
| 214–223 | 246 | |
| 224–233 | 213 | |
| 234–243 | 170 | |
| 244–253 | 167 | |
| 254–263 | 162 | |
| 264–273 | 138 | |
| 274–283 | 138 | |
| 284–293 | 113 | |
| 294–303 | 106 | |
| 304–313 | 95 | |
| 314–323 | 101 | |
| 324–333 | 81 | |
| 334–343 | 69 | |
| 344–353 | 56 | |
| 354–363 | 36 | |
| 364–373 | 42 | |
| 374–383 | 41 | |
| 384–393 | 44 | |
| 394–403 | 27 | |
| 404–413 | 30 | |
| 414–423 | 20 | |
| 424–433 | 29 | |
| 434–443 | 29 | |
| 444–453 | 25 | |
| 454–463 | 19 | |
| 464–473 | 21 | |
| 474–483 | 11 | |
| 484–493 | 17 | |
| 494–503 | 7 | |
| 504–513 | 6 | |
| 514–523 | 12 | |
| 524–533 | 10 | |
| 534–543 | 7 | |
| 544–553 | 6 | |
| 554–563 | 12 | |
| 564–569 | 8 | |
| 570+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George H. Mead sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 44 D-Index — 49th percentile
49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | 177 | |
| 31 | 210 | |
| 32 | 222 | |
| 33 | 188 | |
| 34 | 181 | |
| 35 | 243 | |
| 36 | 261 | |
| 37 | 272 | |
| 38 | 278 | |
| 39 | 300 | |
| 40 | 297 | |
| 41 | 308 | |
| 42 | 313 | |
| 43 | 300 | |
| 44 | 269 | 44 |
| 45 | 260 | |
| 46 | 228 | |
| 47 | 251 | |
| 48 | 203 | |
| 49 | 186 | |
| 50 | 187 | |
| 51 | 166 | |
| 52 | 138 | |
| 53 | 141 | |
| 54 | 131 | |
| 55 | 137 | |
| 56 | 109 | |
| 57 | 129 | |
| 58 | 95 | |
| 59 | 105 | |
| 60 | 106 | |
| 61 | 86 | |
| 62 | 94 | |
| 63 | 77 | |
| 64 | 79 | |
| 65 | 59 | |
| 66 | 68 | |
| 67 | 51 | |
| 68 | 49 | |
| 69 | 40 | |
| 70 | 43 | |
| 71 | 40 | |
| 72 | 50 | |
| 73 | 46 | |
| 74 | 43 | |
| 75 | 45 | |
| 76 | 45 | |
| 77 | 30 | |
| 78 | 25 | |
| 79 | 31 | |
| 80 | 29 | |
| 81 | 18 | |
| 82 | 21 | |
| 83 | 26 | |
| 84 | 15 | |
| 85 | 15 | |
| 86 | 19 | |
| 87 | 19 | |
| 88 | 12 | |
| 89 | 7 | |
| 90 | 19 | |
| 91 | 20 | |
| 92 | 13 | |
| 93 | 9 | |
| 94 | 13 | |
| 95 | 8 | |
| 96 | 7 | |
| 97 | 6 | |
| 98 | 6 | |
| 99 | 6 | |
| 100+ | 97 |
George H. Mead was affiliated with the University of Chicago in the United States during their academic career. They were recognized as a deceased researcher.
Throughout their career, Mead did not have specific records of published papers listed in the available data. Similarly, there are no frequent co-authors associated with their work that have been documented here.
Mead's publications were not specifically categorized by venues with regard to the data provided.
There are no recorded book publications attributed to Mead based on the available source material.
The fields and subfields of study in which Mead conducted research have not been detailed in the source data.
Additionally, the principal topics covered by Mead's research were not specified.
The available information does not include any awards or honors received by Mead.
George Herbert Mead;Charles William Morris
George H. Mead;Charles W. Morris
George Herbert Mead
Unknown
George H. Mead;Charles W. Morris;Gino Germani;Floreal Mazía
George Herbert Mead;Charles W. Morris
George Herbert Mead
George H. Mead;J. Cazeneuve;E. Kaelin;G. Thibault
George Herbert Mead;Anselm L. Strauss
George Herbert Mead
George Herbert Mead;Charles William Morris
George Herbert Mead
George H. Mead
George Herbert Mead;David L. Miller
George Herbert Mead;Charles William Morris;Daniel R. Huebner;Hans Joas
George H. Mead
George Herbert Mead;Charles William Morris
Unknown
George Herbert Mead;Anselm Strauss
George H. Mead
George Herbert Mead;Anselm L. Strauss
Theodore Abel;George H. Mead;Charles W. Morris
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
Pursuing a career in the social sciences and humanities is now more accessible than ever, thanks to flexible online programs. Students can choose from a variety of accredited options tailored to specific interests and career goals.
Those interested in counseling can explore cacrep accredited online counseling programs, ensuring a curriculum that meets high professional standards. If helping families and couples is your passion, consider online mft programs accredited by reputable organizations.
Psychology remains a top choice for many, with online degrees for psychology offering affordability and flexibility. For those drawn to social work, finding the easiest msw online program can be a great way to enter this rewarding field without excessive barriers.
Online programs provide the versatility needed for working professionals and those with busy schedules. With a range of accredited degrees available, students can confidently choose a path that aligns with both their academic interests and desired career outcomes.