World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 45 1540 1426 186 186 238 7270

Ge-qun Shu publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ge-qun Shu between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ge-qun Shu published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 10.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2017. 49 of the 264 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2017. 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 29 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 27 publications 2025: 22 publications
2000 2025

264 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ge-qun Shu: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 2
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 4
2005 3
2006 4
2007 4
2008 3
2009 3
2010 4
2011 6
2012 9
2013 9
2014 15
2015 13
2016 13
2017 29
2018 18
2019 17
2020 9
2021 12
2022 18
2023 20
2024 27
2025 22
Total 264
Download as CSV

Ge-qun Shu publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ge-qun Shu sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 237–246 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 238 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92 238
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Ge-qun Shu D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ge-qun Shu sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79 45
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Gasoline engine exhaust gas recirculation – A review

    Haiqiao Wei;Tianyu Zhu;Gequn Shu;Linlin Tan

  • Simulation and thermodynamic analysis of a bottoming Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) of diesel engine (DE)

    Guopeng Yu;Gequn Shu;Hua Tian;Haiqiao Wei

  • Fluids and parameters optimization for the organic Rankine cycles (ORCs) used in exhaust heat recovery of Internal Combustion Engine (ICE)

    Hua Tian;Gequn Shu;Haiqiao Wei;Xingyu Liang

  • Alkanes as working fluids for high-temperature exhaust heat recovery of diesel engine using organic Rankine cycle

    Gequn Shu;Xiaoning Li;Hua Tian;Xingyu Liang

  • Combustion and particle number emissions of a direct injection spark ignition engine operating on ethanol/gasoline and n-butanol/gasoline blends with exhaust gas recirculation

    Zhijin Zhang;Tianyou Wang;Ming Jia;Qun Wei

  • Parametric and exergetic analysis of waste heat recovery system based on thermoelectric generator and organic rankine cycle utilizing R123

    Gequn Shu;Jian Zhao;Hua Tian;Xingyu Liang

  • Thermo-economic analysis of zeotropic mixtures based on siloxanes for engine waste heat recovery using a dual-loop organic Rankine cycle (DORC)

    Hua Tian;Liwen Chang;Yuanyuan Gao;Gequn Shu

  • An improved CO2-based transcritical Rankine cycle (CTRC) used for engine waste heat recovery

    Gequn Shu;Lingfeng Shi;Hua Tian;Xiaoya Li

  • Operational profile based thermal-economic analysis on an Organic Rankine cycle using for harvesting marine engine’s exhaust waste heat

    Gequn Shu;Peng Liu;Hua Tian;Xuan Wang

  • A Multi-Approach Evaluation System (MA-ES) of Organic Rankine Cycles (ORC) used in waste heat utilization

    Gequn Shu;Guopeng Yu;Hua Tian;Haiqiao Wei

  • Configurations selection maps of CO2-based transcritical Rankine cycle (CTRC) for thermal energy management of engine waste heat

    Gequn Shu;Lingfeng Shi;Hua Tian;Shuai Deng

  • An experimental and modeling study of ammonia oxidation in a jet stirred reactor

    Unknown

  • Analysis of onset and severity of knock in SI engine based on in-cylinder pressure oscillations

    Gequn Shu;Jiaying Pan;Haiqiao Wei

  • Experimental comparison of R123 and R245fa as working fluids for waste heat recovery from heavy-duty diesel engine

    Gequn Shu;Mingru Zhao;Hua Tian;Yongzhan Huo

  • Experimental investigation on the combustion and emissions characteristics of 2-methylfuran gasoline blend fuel in spark-ignition engine

    Haiqiao Wei;Dengquan Feng;Gequn Shu;Mingzhang Pan

  • Comparative study of alternative ORC-based combined power systems to exploit high temperature waste heat

    Chengyu Zhang;Gequn Shu;Hua Tian;Haiqiao Wei

  • Theoretical research on working fluid selection for a high-temperature regenerative transcritical dual-loop engine organic Rankine cycle

    Hua Tian;Lina Liu;Gequn Shu;Haiqiao Wei

  • Comparisons of system benefits and thermo-economics for exhaust energy recovery applied on a heavy-duty diesel engine and a light-duty vehicle gasoline engine

    Tianyou Wang;Yajun Zhang;Jie Zhang;Zhijun Peng

  • Review of dynamic performance and control strategy of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle

    Xuan Wang;Rui Wang;Xingyan Bian;Jinwen Cai

  • Design condition and operating strategy analysis of CO2 transcritical waste heat recovery system for engine with variable operating conditions

    Gequn Shu;Xiaoya Li;Hua Tian;Lingfeng Shi

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their expertise beyond Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, there are several related online degrees and career pathways to consider. One promising option is an online applied behavior analysis degree accelerated, which equips graduates with skills in behavioral assessment and intervention, useful in various technical fields.

When looking at graduate programs, understanding admission criteria is crucial. For example, the slp grad school process highlights the importance of prerequisites and acceptance rates, offering insights that can help engineering students plan their academic journeys effectively.

If accessibility is a priority, some of the easiest speech pathology programs to get into provide flexible entry points and tailored support that can inspire students exploring interdisciplinary opportunities.

Cost considerations also play a significant role in degree choices. Reviewing the cost of online speech pathology degree programs can help prospective students budget accordingly and assess return on investment when branching into complementary fields.

Recently Published Articles