World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Eleanor Palo Stoller

Eleanor Palo Stoller

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 38 6002 2858 78 5225

Eleanor Palo Stoller publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Eleanor Palo Stoller between 1977 and 2012, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Eleanor Palo Stoller published across 36 years, from 1977 to 2012, averaging 2.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 6 publications in 1993. 5 of the 82 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2012. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 6. Peak 6 publications in 1993. 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 2 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 2 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 3 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 4 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 3 publications
1977 2012

82 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Eleanor Palo Stoller: publications per year, 1977 to 2012
Year Publications
1977 1
1978 0
1979 0
1980 1
1981 1
1982 2
1983 2
1984 1
1985 2
1986 0
1987 1
1988 3
1989 3
1990 1
1991 1
1992 4
1993 6
1994 5
1995 3
1996 0
1997 2
1998 3
1999 1
2000 3
2001 3
2002 3
2003 5
2004 4
2005 4
2006 4
2007 1
2008 4
2009 3
2010 0
2011 2
2012 3
Total 82
Download as CSV

Eleanor Palo Stoller publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eleanor Palo Stoller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 74–83 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 78 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225 78
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Eleanor Palo Stoller D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eleanor Palo Stoller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278 38
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Eleanor Palo Stoller is affiliated with Wake Forest University in the United States. Their recent research output includes a publication in 2023 centered on the monetization of regulatory benefits within the federal regulatory state.

Their notable paper is titled "Procedural Burden and Patterns in the Monetization of Regulatory Benefits Across the Federal Regulatory State," published in the Harvard Dataverse. This work examines procedural complexities involved in regulatory frameworks and how benefits are monetized across federal agencies.

Their publication venues to date include:

  • Harvard Dataverse (1 publication)

Currently, there are no frequent co-authors recorded in conjunction with their research outputs.

The scientist's academic contributions focus largely on the procedural and regulatory aspects within federal governance but do not list specific fields of study or subfields yet.

Best Publications

  • The effects of sleep loss and fatigue on resident-physicians: a multi-institutional, mixed-method study.

    Klara K. Papp;Eleanor P. Stoller;Paulette Sage;James E. Aikens

  • Parental Caregiving by Adult Children.

    Eleanor Palo Stoller

  • Help with Activities of Everyday Life: Sources of Support for the Noninstitutionalized Elderly

    Eleanor Palo Stoller;Lorna L. Earl

  • Other roles of caregivers: competing responsibilities or supportive resources.

    Eleanor Palo Stoller;Karen L. Pugliesi

  • How Do Female and Male Faculty Members Construct Job Satisfaction? The Roles of Perceived Institutional Leadership and Mentoring and their Mediating Processes

    Diana Bilimoria;Susan R. Perry;Xiangfen Liang;Eleanor Palo Stoller

  • Males as Helpers: The Role of Sons, Relatives, and Friends

    Eleanor Palo Stoller

  • Self-care responses to symptoms by older people. A health diary study of illness behavior.

    Eleanor Palo Stoller;Lorna Earl Forster;Susan Portugal

  • Long-term impact of preventive proactivity on quality of life of the old-old.

    Eva Kahana;Renee H. Lawrence;Boaz Kahana;Kyle Kercher

  • Exchange Patterns in the Informal Support Networks of the Elderly: The Impact of Reciprocity on Morale

    Eleanor Palo Stoller

  • Pandora’s Briefcase: Unpacking the Retirement Migration Decision

    Charles F. Longino;Adam Thomas Perzynski;Eleanor P. Stoller

  • Self-assessments of health by the elderly: the impact of informal assistance.

    Eleanor Palo Stoller

  • Informal networks of community-based elderly. Changes in composition over time.

    Eleanor Palo Stoller;Karen L. Pugliesi

  • Alcohol use and potential risk for alcohol-related adverse drug reactions among community-based elderly.

    Lorna Earl Forster;Rachel Pollow;Eleanor Palo Stoller

  • Perceived Income Adequacy among Elderly Retirees

    Michael Alan Stoller;Eleanor Palo Stoller

  • The Impact of Gender on Configurations of Care among Married Elderly Couples

    Eleanor Palo Stoller;Stephen J. Cutler

  • Worlds of difference : inequality in the aging experience

    Eleanor Palo Stoller;Rose Campbell Gibson

  • Size and Effectiveness of Informal Helping Networks: A Panel Study of Older People in the Community*

    Eleanor Palo Stoller;Karen L. Pugliesi

  • Predictors of Use of Paid Help Among Older People Living in the Community

    Eleanor Palo Stoller;Stephen J. Cutler

  • Situating Stress: Lessons from Lay Discourses on Diabetes

    Nancy E. Schoenberg;Elaine M. Drew;Eleanor Palo Stoller;Cary S. Kart

  • Patterns of physician utilization by the elderly: a multivariate analysis.

    Eleanor Palo Stoller

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles F. Longino
Charles F. Longino Wake Forest University
Nancy E. Schoenberg
Nancy E. Schoenberg University of Kentucky
Kingman P. Strohl
Kingman P. Strohl Case Western Reserve University
James E. Aikens
James E. Aikens University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Joseph G. Grzywacz
Joseph G. Grzywacz San Jose State University
Boaz Kahana
Boaz Kahana Cleveland State University
Sara A. Quandt
Sara A. Quandt Wake Forest University
Eva Kahana
Eva Kahana Case Western Reserve University
Kurt C. Stange
Kurt C. Stange Case Western Reserve University
Thomas A. Arcury
Thomas A. Arcury Wake Forest University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Social Sciences and Humanities, exploring flexible online programs can open doors to both advanced knowledge and diverse careers. Many learners choose a masters degree online to gain specialized expertise and boost their credentials without leaving their jobs or relocating.

Those seeking a faster route to graduation might consider accelerated degree programs, which are designed to help you complete your qualifications quickly. This can be an excellent option for career changers or those eager to enter the workforce.

Affordability is also a key concern. Students focused on social work should explore the cheapest msw programs online to save on tuition while gaining valuable skills for community impact.

Additionally, if your interest lies in behavioral science, earning certification through bcba certification programs can lead to rewarding roles in counseling, education, and therapy. With so many accredited, flexible options available, online study is an accessible pathway to meaningful careers in the field.

Best Scientists Citing Eleanor Palo Stoller

Recently Published Articles