World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
55
Citations
10541
World Ranking
4730
National Ranking
143

E.C.W. van Straaten publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where E.C.W. van Straaten sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 125 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

E.C.W. van Straaten D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where E.C.W. van Straaten sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • The organization of physiological brain networks.

    C.J. Stam;E.C.W. van Straaten

  • Progression of white matter hyperintensities and incidence of new lacunes over a 3-year period: the Leukoaraiosis and Disability study.

    A.A. Gouw;W.M. van der Flier;F. Fazekas;E.C.W. van Straaten

  • Opportunities and methodological challenges in EEG and MEG resting state functional brain network research

    E. van Diessen;T. Numan;E. van Dellen;E. van Dellen;A.W. van der Kooi

  • Small Vessel Disease and General Cognitive Function in Nondisabled Elderly The LADIS Study

    Wiesje M. van der Flier;Elizabeth C.W. van Straaten;Frederik Barkhof;Ana Verdelho

  • Activity dependent degeneration explains hub vulnerability in Alzheimer's disease.

    Willem de Haan;Katherine Mott;Elisabeth C. W. van Straaten;Philip Scheltens

  • Direction of information flow in large-scale resting-state networks is frequency-dependent

    Arjan Hillebrand;Prejaas Tewarie;Edwin van Dellen;Meichen Yu

  • Impact of White Matter Hyperintensities Scoring Method on Correlations With Clinical Data The LADIS Study

    Elisabeth C.W. Van Straaten;Franz Fazekas;Egill Rostrup;Philip Scheltens

  • The trees and the forest: Characterization of complex brain networks with minimum spanning trees.

    C.J. Stam;P. Tewarie;E. Van Dellen;E.C.W. van Straaten

  • Incident lacunes influence cognitive decline: the LADIS study.

    H. Jokinen;A.A. Gouw;S. Madureira;R. Ylikoski

  • The significance of medial temporal lobe atrophy A postmortem MRI study in the very old

    F. Barkhof;T. M. Polvikoski;E.C.W. van Straaten;R. N. Kalaria

  • Operational Definitions for the NINDS-AIREN Criteria for Vascular Dementia. An Interobserver Study

    Elisabeth C.W. Van Straaten;Philip Scheltens;Dirk L. Knol;Mark A. Van Buchem

  • Measuring progression of cerebral white matter lesions on MRI Visual rating and volumetrics

    N. D. Prins;E. C.W. van Straaten;E. J. van Dijk;M. Simoni

  • Brain atrophy accelerates cognitive decline in cerebral small vessel disease: the LADIS study.

    H. Jokinen;J. Lipsanen;R. Schmidt;F. Fazekas

  • Declining functional connectivity and changing hub locations in Alzheimer’s disease: an EEG study

    Marjolein M A Engels;Cornelis J Stam;Wiesje M van der Flier;Philip Scheltens

  • White matter hyperintensities rather than lacunar infarcts are associated with depressive symptoms in older people: the LADIS study.

    John T. O'Brien;Michael J. Firbank;Mani S. Krishnan;Elisabeth C.W. van Straaten

  • Structure out of chaos: functional brain network analysis with EEG, MEG, and functional MRI.

    Elisabeth C.W. van Straaten;Cornelis J. Stam

  • Go with the flow: use of a directed phase lag index (dPLI) to characterize patterns of phase relations in a large-scale model of brain dynamics.

    C.J. Stam;E.C.W. van Straaten

  • Selective impairment of hippocampus and posterior hub areas in Alzheimer’s disease: an MEG-based multiplex network study

    Meichen Yu;Marjolein M. A. Engels;Arjan Hillebrand;Elisabeth C. W. van Straaten

  • The relation between structural and functional connectivity patterns in complex brain networks

    C J Stam;E C W van Straaten;E Van Dellen;P Tewarie

  • The Contribution of Medial Temporal Lobe Atrophy and Vascular Pathology to Cognitive Impairment in Vascular Dementia

    António J. Bastos-Leite;Wiesje M. van der Flier;Elisabeth C.W. van Straaten;Salka S. Staekenborg

Frequent Co-Authors

Frederik Barkhof
Frederik Barkhof University College London
Philip Scheltens
Philip Scheltens Amsterdam UMC
Cornelis J. Stam
Cornelis J. Stam Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Domenico Inzitari
Domenico Inzitari University of Florence
Leonardo Pantoni
Leonardo Pantoni University of Milan
Timo Erkinjuntti
Timo Erkinjuntti University of Helsinki
Franz Fazekas
Franz Fazekas Medical University of Graz
Arjan Hillebrand
Arjan Hillebrand Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Alida A. Gouw
Alida A. Gouw VU University Medical Center
Gunhild Waldemar
Gunhild Waldemar Copenhagen University Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing E.C.W. van Straaten

Recently Published Articles