World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Physics

D-Index
71
Citations
23446
World Ranking
3622
National Ranking
1693

David N. Schramm publication distribution in Physics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Physics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David N. Schramm sits on this spectrum.

103–122 publications: 7 scientists 123–142 publications: 10 scientists 143–162 publications: 31 scientists 163–182 publications: 35 scientists 183–202 publications: 53 scientists 203–222 publications: 81 scientists 223–242 publications: 85 scientists 243–262 publications: 112 scientists 263–282 publications: 114 scientists 283–302 publications: 126 scientists 303–322 publications: 136 scientists 323–342 publications: 162 scientists 343–362 publications: 155 scientists 363–382 publications: 156 scientists 383–402 publications: 134 scientists 403–422 publications: 145 scientists 423–442 publications: 147 scientists 443–462 publications: 131 scientists 463–482 publications: 131 scientists 483–502 publications: 116 scientists 503–522 publications: 106 scientists 523–542 publications: 103 scientists 543–562 publications: 87 scientists 563–582 publications: 84 scientists 583–602 publications: 94 scientists 603–622 publications: 70 scientists 623–642 publications: 76 scientists 643–662 publications: 60 scientists 663–682 publications: 54 scientists 683–702 publications: 60 scientists 703–722 publications: 48 scientists 723–742 publications: 64 scientists 743–762 publications: 48 scientists 763–782 publications: 37 scientists 783–802 publications: 43 scientists 803–822 publications: 34 scientists 823–842 publications: 36 scientists 843–862 publications: 32 scientists 863–882 publications: 32 scientists 883–902 publications: 31 scientists 903–922 publications: 25 scientists 923–942 publications: 15 scientists 943–962 publications: 24 scientists 963–982 publications: 13 scientists 983–1,002 publications: 21 scientists 1,003–1,022 publications: 21 scientists 1,023–1,042 publications: 16 scientists 1,043–1,062 publications: 9 scientists 1,063–1,082 publications: 19 scientists 1,083–1,102 publications: 11 scientists 1,103–1,122 publications: 17 scientists 1,123–1,142 publications: 11 scientists 1,143–1,162 publications: 7 scientists 1,163–1,182 publications: 4 scientists 1,183–1,202 publications: 10 scientists 1,203–1,222 publications: 8 scientists 1,223–1,242 publications: 16 scientists 1,243–1,262 publications: 4 scientists 1,263–1,282 publications: 10 scientists 1,283–1,302 publications: 5 scientists 1,303–1,322 publications: 7 scientists 1,323–1,342 publications: 4 scientists 1,343–1,362 publications: 8 scientists 1,363–1,382 publications: 6 scientists 1,383–1,402 publications: 7 scientists 1,403–1,422 publications: 3 scientists 1,423–1,442 publications: 4 scientists 1,443–1,462 publications: 4 scientists 1,463–1,468 publications: 3 scientists 1,469+ publications: 100 scientists
103 publications 1,469+

This scientist: 439 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,469 publications or more.

David N. Schramm D-index placement in Physics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Physics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David N. Schramm sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 76 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 110 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 143 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 153 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 144 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 167 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 167 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 166 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 132 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 155 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 134 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 137 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 102 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 112 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 110 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 116 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 97 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 103 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 87 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 90 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 78 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 75 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 67 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 69 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 59 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 53 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 42 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 41 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 33 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 32 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 45 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 19 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 24 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 28 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 31 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 20 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 12 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 24 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 23 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 15 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 15 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 11 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 17 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 12 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 11 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 9 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 9 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 11 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 4 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 8 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 5 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 3 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 4 scientists 184 D-Index: 4 scientists 185+ D-Index: 99 scientists
70 D-Index 185+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 185 D-Index or more.

Overview

David N. Schramm was affiliated with the University of Chicago in the United States. Their research spanned multiple disciplines, primarily focusing on physics, astronomy, biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. The scientist contributed to understanding both cosmic phenomena and genetic diversity.

Their notable publications included the 2022 paper titled On the origin of highest energy cosmic rays, published in OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). Another significant work was a 2025 study titled Are genetic differences between eastern and western Golden-crowned Kinglets populations correlated with environmental variation?, published in the Canadian Journal of Zoology.

Research topics covered in their work involved:

  • Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
  • Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Animal Behavior and Reproduction

David N. Schramm's main fields of study included:

  • Physics and Astronomy
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Within those fields, their subfields of study consisted of:

  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics
  • Genetics
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Frequent coauthors collaborating with David N. Schramm were:

  • G. Sigl
  • Pijushpani Bhattacharjee
  • Brendan A. Graham
  • Theresa M. Burg

They published in venues including:

  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)
  • Canadian Journal of Zoology

Best Publications

  • Nucleosynthesis, neutrino bursts and gamma-rays from coalescing neutron stars

    David Eichler;David Eichler;Mario Livio;Tsvi Piran;Tsvi Piran;David N. Schramm;David N. Schramm

  • Primordial nucleosynthesis redux

    Terry P. Walker;Terry P. Walker;Gary Steigman;David N. Schramm;Keith A. Olive

  • Black-Hole-Neutron-Star Collisions

    J. M. Lattimer;D. N. Schramm

  • Primordial nucleosynthesis: a critical comparison of theory and observation

    Jong-Mann Yang;Michael S. Turner;G. Steigman;D.N. Schramm

  • The tidal disruption of neutron stars by black holes in close binaries.

    James M. Lattimer;David N. Schramm

  • Big-bang nucleosynthesis and the baryon density of the universe.

    Craig J. Copi;David N. Schramm;David N. Schramm;Michael S. Turner;Michael S. Turner

  • Big-bang nucleosynthesis enters the precision era

    David N. Schramm;David N. Schramm;Michael S. Turner;Michael S. Turner

  • Cosmological Limits to the Number of Massive Leptons

    Gary Steigman;David N. Schramm;James E. Gunn

  • Grand unified theories, topological defects, and ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays.

    Pijushpani Bhattacharjee;Christopher T. Hill;David N. Schramm

  • Element Production in the Early Universe

    David N. Schramm;Robert V. Wagoner

  • Ultrahigh-energy cosmic-ray spectrum

    Christopher T. Hill;David N. Schramm

  • Some Astrophysical Consequences of the Existence of a Heavy Stable Neutral Lepton

    J. E. Gunn;B. W. Lee;I. Lerche;D. N. Schramm

  • The origin of deuterium

    Richard I. Epstein;James M. Lattimer;David N. Schramm

  • Ultra-high-energy cosmic rays from superconducting cosmic strings.

    Christopher T. Hill;David N. Schramm;Terry P. Walker

  • Cosmological structure formation from soft topological defects

    Christopher T. Hill;David N. Schramm;James N. Fry

  • The decompression of cold neutron star matter

    James M. Lattimer;Fred Mackie;D. G. Ravenhall;D. N. Schramm

  • Spontaneous generation of density perturbations in the early Universe

    Matt Crawford;David N. Schramm

  • Condensation in supernova ejecta and isotopic anomalies in meteorites

    J. M. Lattimer;D. N. Schramm;L. Grossman

  • An unbound universe

    J. R. Gott;James E. Gunn;D. N. Schramm;B. M. Tinsley

  • The Weak Neutral Current and its Effects in Stellar Collapse

    Daniel Z. Freedman;David N. Schramm;David L. Tubbs

Frequent Co-Authors

Keith A. Olive
Keith A. Olive University of Minnesota
Michael S. Turner
Michael S. Turner University of Chicago
J. B. Blake
J. B. Blake The Aerospace Corporation
James M. Lattimer
James M. Lattimer Stony Brook University
John Ellis
John Ellis King's College London
P. J. E. Peebles
P. J. E. Peebles Princeton University
James E. Gunn
James E. Gunn Princeton University
David D. Thomas
David D. Thomas University of Minnesota
Alexander S. Szalay
Alexander S. Szalay Johns Hopkins University
Katherine Freese
Katherine Freese The University of Texas at Austin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing David N. Schramm