World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
David D Lambert

David D Lambert

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 30 9141 423 86 3143

David D Lambert publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David D Lambert between 1985 and 2008, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David D Lambert published across 24 years, from 1985 to 2008, averaging 3.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 1997. 1 of the 92 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2008. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 1997. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 3 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 17 publications 1998: 17 publications 1999: 15 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication
1985 2008

92 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David D Lambert: publications per year, 1985 to 2008
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 0
1987 1
1988 3
1989 2
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 2
1995 3
1996 4
1997 17
1998 17
1999 15
2000 8
2001 10
2002 3
2003 2
2004 1
2005 1
2006 1
2007 0
2008 1
Total 92
Download as CSV

David D Lambert publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David D Lambert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 78–87 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 86 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278 86
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

David D Lambert D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David D Lambert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 30 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144 30
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

David D Lambert is affiliated with Griffith University in Australia. Their academic profile indicates active engagement in research, although no specific details about recent papers, coauthors, or publication venues are available.

No records of book publications or distinct fields or subfields of study have been provided for this researcher. Similarly, there are no documented main topics of work or awards associated with their name in the available data.

While the details on publications and collaborations remain unspecified, the association with Griffith University suggests a connection to an academic environment that supports research activities.

Given the limited data on academic contributions or scientific focus areas, the profile remains concise and focused on the verified affiliation information.

Best Publications

  • Osmium isotope constraints on ore metal recycling in subduction zones

    Brent I. A. McInnes;Jannene S. McBride;Noreen J. Evans;David D. Lambert

  • Re–Os isotopic evidence for genesis of Archaean nickel ores from uncontaminated komatiites

    Jeffrey G. Foster;David D. Lambert;Louise R. Frick;Roland Maas

  • Inhomogeneous distribution of REE in scheelite and dynamics of Archaean hydrothermal systems (Mt. Charlotte and Drysdale gold deposits, Western Australia)

    Joël Brugger;Yann Lahaye;Sylvie Costa;David Lambert

  • Re–Os isotopic systematics of the Voisey's Bay Ni–Cu–Co magmatic ore system, Labrador, Canada

    David D Lambert;Jeffrey G Foster;Louise R Frick;C Li

  • Re—Os and Sm—Nd Isotope Geochemistry of the Stillwater Complex, Montana: Implications for the Petrogenesis of the J-M Reef

    D. D. Lambert;R. J. Walker;J. W. Morgan;S. B. Shirey

  • Origins of Nd–Sr–Pb isotopic variations in single scheelite grains from Archaean gold deposits, Western Australia

    Joël Brugger;Roland Maas;Yann Lahaye;Colin McRae

  • Archaean mafic magmatism in the Kalgoorlie area of the Yilgarn Craton, Western Australia: a geochemical and Nd isotopic study of the petrogenetic and tectonic evolution of a greenstone belt

    Roger Bateman;Sylvie Costa;Theingi Swe;David Lambert

  • RE-OS, SM-ND, AND PB ISOTOPIC CONSTRAINTS ON MANTLE AND CRUSTAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO MAGMATIC SULFIDE MINERALIZATION IN THE DULUTH COMPLEX

    Edward M Ripley;David D Lambert;Louise R Frick

  • Geodynamics of magmatic Cu-Ni-PGE sulfide deposits: New insights from the Re-Os isotope system

    David D. Lambert;Jeffrey G. Foster;Louise R. Frick;Edward M. Ripley

  • Re-Os Isotope Systematics of the Voisey’s Bay Ni-Cu-Co Magmatic Sulfide System, Labrador, Canada: II. Implications for Parental Magma Chemistry, Ore Genesis, and Metal Redistribution

    David D Lambert;Louise R Frick;Jeffrey G Foster;Chusi Li

  • Osmium Isotopic Evidence for Crust–Mantle Interaction in the Genesis of Continental Intraplate Basalts from the Newer Volcanics Province, Southeastern Australia

    Jannene McBride;David D Lambert;Ian A Nicholls;R C Price

  • Multistage evolution of Australian subcontinental mantle: Re-Os isotopic constraints from Victorian mantle xenoliths

    Jannene S. McBride;David D. Lambert;Alan Greig;Ian A. Nicholls

  • Re-Os isotopic evidence for a lower crustal origin of massif-type anorthosites

    Henrik Schiellerup;David D. Lambert;David D. Lambert;Tore Prestvik;Brian Robins

  • The petrogenesis of carbonatite, melnoite and kimberlite from the Eastern Goldfields Province, Yilgarn Craton

    Stuart Graham;Stuart Graham;David Lambert;Simon Shee

  • Re-Os isotope geochemistry of Tertiary picritic and basaltic magmatism of East Greenland: constraints on plume-lithosphere interactions and the genesis of the Platinova reef, Skaergaard intrusion

    C.K Brooks;R.R Keays;R.R Keays;D.D Lambert;L.R Frick

  • Re-Os isotopic evidence for Archean lithospheric mantle beneath the Kimberley block, Western Australia

    Stuart Graham;David D. Lambert;Simon R. Shee;Chris B. Smith

  • Ultraviolet Laser Sampling and High Resolution Inductively Coupled Plasma‐Mass Spectrometry of NIST and BCR‐2G Glass Reference Materials

    Yann Lahaye;David D Lambert;Steve Walters

  • Laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry: an investigation of elemental responses and matrix effects in the analysis of geostandard materials

    C.A. Morrison;D.D. Lambert;R.J.S. Morrison;W.W. Ahlers

  • Rhenium-Osmium and Samarium-Neodymium Isotopic Systematics of the Stillwater Complex

    David D. Lambert;John W. Morgan;Richard J. Walker;Steven B. Shirey

  • Application of the Re‐Os isotopic system to the study of Precambrian magmatic sulfide deposits of Western Australia

    David D Lambert;Jeffrey G Foster;Louise R Frick;Dean M Hoatson

Frequent Co-Authors

Yann Lahaye
Yann Lahaye Geological Survey of Finland
John W. Morgan
John W. Morgan University of Maryland, College Park
Reid R. Keays
Reid R. Keays Monash University
Edward M. Ripley
Edward M. Ripley Indiana University
Steven B. Shirey
Steven B. Shirey Carnegie Institution for Science
Joël Brugger
Joël Brugger Monash University
Anthony J. Naldrett
Anthony J. Naldrett University of Toronto
Richard W. Carlson
Richard W. Carlson Carnegie Institution for Science
Richard J. Walker
Richard J. Walker University of Maryland, College Park
Norman J. Pearson
Norman J. Pearson Macquarie University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science in the USA opens up diverse opportunities, including various online degree programs that complement this field. Many students seek affordable and flexible options, much like those found in the spanish online degree programs, which balance cost-efficiency with career potential.

For veterans interested in furthering their education alongside their service backgrounds, resources similar to online spanish degrees for veterans demonstrate how military experience can align with academic achievement in various fields, including Earth Science.

Creative and interdisciplinary approaches are also relevant, as seen in programs like the online mfa visual arts. These degrees can enhance technical skills and presentation abilities, essential for communicating scientific findings effectively.

Additionally, understanding organizational dynamics through degrees like the online masters in human resource management prepares professionals for leadership roles in environmental agencies and research institutions. Together, these pathways provide comprehensive options for students pursuing careers linked to Earth Science.

Best Scientists Citing David D Lambert

Recently Published Articles