World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
41
Citations
15914
World Ranking
8580
National Ranking
3674

Carsten Lund publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carsten Lund sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 91 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Carsten Lund D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carsten Lund sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Carsten Lund is affiliated with AT&T in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of medicine, with specific emphasis on public health, environmental and occupational health, as well as sociology and political science.

Their work spans multiple topics within medical and health sciences research and criminal law and policy. These areas illustrate a multidisciplinary approach combining health sciences with aspects of legal and social frameworks.

Recent publications by Carsten Lund include the following:

  • "Corona-Pandemie: Rechtsstaat - Sozialstaat" - 54. Richterwoche des Bundessozialgerichts, 2022, GesundheitsRecht
  • Anmerkung zu BSG, Urt. v. 26.1.2022 - B 6 KA 2/21 R (SG Magdeburg), 2022, Medizinrecht
  • Validation and comparative study of the Motus system for accurately identifying movement behaviours using different sampling frequencies, 2025, Scientific Reports

Carsten Lund frequently collaborates with other researchers in their field. Notable co-authors include:

  • Tonje Pedersen Ludvigsen
  • Jon Roslyng Larsen
  • Pasan Hettiarachchi
  • Mikkel Brandt
  • Nidhi Gupta

Their research has been published across several venues, including:

  • GesundheitsRecht
  • Medizinrecht
  • Scientific Reports

Best Publications

  • Proof verification and the hardness of approximation problems.

    Sanjeev Arora;Carsten Lund;Rajeev Motwani;Madhu Sudan

  • On the hardness of approximating minimization problems

    Carsten Lund;Mihalis Yannakakis

  • Proof verification and hardness of approximation problems

    S. Arora;C. Lund;R. Motwani;M. Sudan

  • Algebraic methods for interactive proof systems

    Carsten Lund;Lance Fortnow;Howard Karloff;Noam Nisan

  • Non-deterministic exponential time has two-prover interactive protocols

    L. Babai;L. Babai;L. Fortnow;C. Lund

  • Estimating flow distributions from sampled flow statistics

    Nick Duffield;Carsten Lund;Mikkel Thorup

  • Deriving traffic demands for operational IP networks: methodology and experience

    Anja Feldmann;Albert Greenberg;Carsten Lund;Nick Reingold

  • Non-deterministic exponential time has two-prover interactive protocols

    Unknown

  • Efficient probabilistically checkable proofs and applications to approximations

    M. Bellare;S. Goldwasser;C. Lund;A. Russell

  • Hardness of approximations

    Sanjeev Arora;Carsten Lund

  • An information-theoretic approach to traffic matrix estimation

    Yin Zhang;Matthew Roughan;Carsten Lund;David Donoho

  • NetScope: traffic engineering for IP networks

    A. Feldmann;A. Greenberg;C. Lund;N. Reingold

  • Properties and prediction of flow statistics from sampled packet streams

    Nick Duffield;Carsten Lund;Mikkel Thorup

  • Nondeterministic exponential time has two-prover interactive protocols

    L. Babai;L. Fortnow;C. Lund

  • Online identification of hierarchical heavy hitters: algorithms, evaluation, and applications

    Yin Zhang;Sumeet Singh;Subhabrata Sen;Nick Duffield

  • Charging from sampled network usage

    Nick Duffield;Carsten Lund;Mikkel Thorup

  • The Approximation of Maximum Subgraph Problems

    Carsten Lund;Mihalis Yannakakis

  • Algebraic methods for interactive proof systems

    C. Lund;L. Fortnow;H. Karloff;N. Nisan

  • Learn more, sample less: control of volume and variance in network measurement

    N. Duffield;C. Lund;M. Thorup

  • Traffic engineering system and method

    Anja Feldmann;Albert Greenberg;Carsten Lund;Nicholas Reingold

  • Estimating point-to-point and point-to-multipoint traffic matrices: an information-theoretic approach

    Yin Zhang;Matthew Roughan;Carsten Lund;David L. Donoho

Frequent Co-Authors

Nick Duffield
Nick Duffield Texas A&M University
Mikkel Thorup
Mikkel Thorup University of Copenhagen
Alexandre Gerber
Alexandre Gerber AT&T (United States)
Subhabrata Sen
Subhabrata Sen AT&T (United States)
Edith Cohen
Edith Cohen Tel Aviv University
Haim Kaplan
Haim Kaplan Tel Aviv University
Joan Feigenbaum
Joan Feigenbaum Yale University
Lance Fortnow
Lance Fortnow Illinois Institute of Technology
Yin Zhang
Yin Zhang The University of Texas at Austin
Anne Condon
Anne Condon University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Computer Science can open up a wide range of career pathways. Many U.S. institutions now offer flexible options for students, including fastest computer science degree programs that let you complete your studies at an accelerated pace. These are ideal for motivated learners seeking to enter the workforce quickly.

If you’re concerned about past academic performance, there are also universities for low gpa applicants, making it possible for more students to access quality online education. This widens the pool of potential students interested in tech careers.

For those interested in the intersection of technology and environmental fields, consider an online environmental engineering degree science and engineering program. These degrees blend principles from both domains, preparing graduates for roles in sustainable tech and environmental protection.

Curious about broader career possibilities? Discover what can you do with an environmental science major to see how combining environmental awareness with tech skills can further enhance your employability.

Best Scientists Citing Carsten Lund

Recently Published Articles