World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
34
Citations
5005
World Ranking
851
National Ranking
455

Benjamin Radcliff publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benjamin Radcliff sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 80 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Benjamin Radcliff D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benjamin Radcliff sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Benjamin Radcliff was affiliated with the University of Notre Dame in the United States. Their academic work focused primarily on the fields of psychology and social sciences, with particular attention to social psychology, general health professions, health, sociology, and political science.

The research topics Radcliff explored included psychological well-being and life satisfaction, employment and welfare studies, health disparities and outcomes, social and cultural dynamics, cultural differences and values, and impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health.

Among Radcliff's recent papers were studies such as "The Welfare State and Human Well-Being Around the World: A Cross-National Analysis" (2023, Applied Research in Quality of Life), "Public Sector Employment, Quality of Government, and Well-Being: A Global Analysis" (2021, International Area Studies Review), "Varieties of democracy and life satisfaction: Is there a connection?" (2024, Social Science Quarterly), and "The Pandemic and Political Behavior: Staying the Course" (2024, PS Political Science & Politics).

  • Alexander C. Pacek
  • Emma Schmidt
  • Francesco Bromo
  • Robert J. Davidson
  • Geoffrey C. Layman

  • Applied Research in Quality of Life
  • Social Science Quarterly
  • International Area Studies Review
  • PS Political Science & Politics

Radcliff's frequent co-authors included Alexander C. Pacek, Emma Schmidt, Francesco Bromo, Robert J. Davidson, and Geoffrey C. Layman. This collaborative pattern reflects the interdisciplinary nature of their work across psychology, social sciences, and political science.

Best Publications

  • Politics, Markets, and Life Satisfaction: The Political Economy of Human Happiness

    Benjamin Radcliff

  • On the Determinants of the Success of Economic Sanctions: An Empirical Analysis

    Jaleh Dashti-Gibson;Patricia Davis;Benjamin Radcliff

  • The Welfare State, Turnout, and the Economy: A Comparative Analysis

    Benjamin Radcliff

  • Labor Organization and Electoral Participation in Industrial Democracies

    Benjamin Radcliff;Patricia Davis

  • The Political Economy of Competitive Elections in the Developing World

    Alexander Pacek;Benjamin Radcliff

  • Assessing the Welfare State: The Politics of Happiness

    Alexander C. Pacek;Benjamin Radcliff

  • Economic Voting and the Welfare State: A Cross-National Analysis

    Alexander C. Pacek;Benjamin Radcliff

  • Turnout and the Vote for Left-of-Centre Parties: A Cross-National Analysis

    Alexander Pacek;Benjamin Radcliff

  • Turnout and the Democratic Vote

    Benjamin Radcliff

  • Welfare Policy and Subjective Well-Being Across Nations: An Individual-Level Assessment

    Alexander C. Pacek;Benjamin Radcliff

  • The Political Economy of Human Happiness: How Voters' Choices Determine the Quality of Life

    Benjamin Radcliff

  • Private Prayer and Civic Involvement

    Matthew T. Loveland;David Sikkink;Daniel J. Myers;Benjamin Radcliff

  • Organized labor and electoral participation in American national elections

    Benjamin Radcliff

  • Condorcet Winners and the Paradox of Voting: Probability Calculations for Weak Preference Orders

    Bradford Jones;Benjamin Radcliff;Charles Taber;Richard Timpone

  • The Politics of Happiness: On the Political Determinants of Quality of Life in the American States

    Ángel Álvarez-Díaz;Lucas González;Benjamin Radcliff

  • Race, Turnout, and Public Policy In the American States

    Benjamin Radcliff;Martin Saiz

  • Labor Organization and Public Policy in the American States

    Benjamin Radcliff;Martin Saiz

  • Reward Without Punishment: Economic Conditions and the Vote:

    Benjamin Radcliff

  • Assessing the Impact of the Size and Scope of Government on Human Well-Being

    Patrick Flavin;Alexander C. Pacek;Benjamin Radcliff

  • Electoral Participation, Ideology, and Party Politics in Post-Communist Europe

    Robert E. Bohrer;Alexander C. Pacek;Benjamin Radcliff

  • State Intervention and Subjective Well-Being in Advanced Industrial Democracies

    Patrick Flavin;Alexander C. Pacek;Benjamin Radcliff

  • Happiness, economics and politics : towards a multi-disciplinary approach

    Amitava Krishna Dutt;Benjamin Radcliff

  • Happiness, Economics and Politics

    Amitava Dutt;Benjamin Radcliff

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick Flavin
Patrick Flavin Baylor University
Larry M. Bartels
Larry M. Bartels Vanderbilt University
David Altman
David Altman Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
William A. Galston
William A. Galston Brookings Institution
Rodney E. Hero
Rodney E. Hero Arizona State University
Charles S. Taber
Charles S. Taber Kansas State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science in the USA provides a strong foundation for a variety of career paths. If you're looking to broaden your opportunities, consider related fields and online education options. Many students benefit from cheap online courses to supplement their political science knowledge or to explore new areas affordably.

For those interested in interdisciplinary careers, you might explore jobs for environmental science majors, as these frequently intersect with policy, regulation, and advocacy work. Analytical students may also benefit from a bachelor of mathematics online to strengthen quantitative and data analysis skills—great assets in fields like polling, research, and public policy.

Those with an interest in information management, research, or public access to knowledge can explore online programs for library science. These programs prepare graduates for roles in archives, government agencies, or think tanks. By exploring such pathways, Political Science students can diversify their skills and adapt to various evolving careers.

Best Scientists Citing Benjamin Radcliff

Recently Published Articles