World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
32
Citations
4228
World Ranking
3198
National Ranking
1276

B. M. Golam Kibria publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where B. M. Golam Kibria sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 170 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

B. M. Golam Kibria D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where B. M. Golam Kibria sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Performance of some new ridge regression estimators

    B. M. Golam Kibria

  • On Some Ridge Regression Estimators: An Empirical Comparisons

    Gisela Muniz;B. M. Golam Kibria

  • Performance of some new preliminary test ridge regression estimators and their properties

    A.K.Md. Ehsanes Saleh;B.M. Golam Kibria

  • Normal and Student´s t Distributions and Their Applications

    Unknown

  • Performance of Some Logistic Ridge Regression Estimators

    B. M. Golam Kibria;Kristofer Månsson;Ghazi Shukur;Ghazi Shukur

  • On Liu Estimators for the Logit Regression Model

    Kristofer Månsson;B.M. Golam Kibria;Ghazi Shukur;Ghazi Shukur

  • Some Ridge Regression Estimators and Their Performances

    B M Golam Kibria;Shipra Banik

  • Predicting losses of residential structures in the state of Florida by the public hurricane loss evaluation model

    Shahid Hamid;B.M. Golam Kibria;Sneh Gulati;Mark Powell

  • A Simulation Study of Some Ridge Regression Estimators under Different Distributional Assumptions

    Kristofer Månsson;Ghazi Shukur;B. M. Golam Kibria

  • Preliminary test ridge regression estimators with student’s t errors and conflicting test-statistics

    B. M. Golam Kibria;A. K. Md. E. Saleh

  • On developing ridge regression parameters: a graphical investigation

    Gisela Muniz;B. M. Golam Kibria;Kristofer Mansson Mansson;Ghazi Shukur

  • Some Liu and ridge-type estimators and their properties under the ill-conditioned Gaussian linear regression model

    B. M. Golam Kibria

  • Bayesian Spatial Prediction of Random Space-Time Fields With Application to Mapping PM2.5 Exposure

    B. M. Golam Kibria;Li Sun;James V Zidek;Nhu D Le

  • Improved Liu Estimators for the Poisson Regression Model

    Kristofer Månsson;B. M. Golam Kibria;Pär Sjölander;Ghazi Shukur

  • A new estimator for the multicollinear Poisson regression model: simulation and application.

    Adewale F. Lukman;Emmanuel Adewuyi;Kristofer Månsson;B. M. Golam Kibria

  • Estimating the Population Coefficient of Variation by Confidence Intervals

    Shipra Banik;B. M. Golam Kibria

  • On some test statistics for testing homogeneity of variances: a comparative study

    Dinesh Sharma;B. M. Golam Kibria

  • Improving the estimators of the parameters of a probit regression model: A ridge regression approach

    B.M. Golam Kibria;A.K.Md.E. Saleh

  • A Note On Beta Inverse-Weibull Distribution

    Sharoon Hanook;Muhammad Qaiser Shahbaz;Muhammad Mohsin;B. M. Golam Kibria

  • Bayesian Statistics and Marketing

    B. M. Golam Kibria

Frequent Co-Authors

Saralees Nadarajah
Saralees Nadarajah University of Manchester
Mark D. Powell
Mark D. Powell National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Shu-Ching Chen
Shu-Ching Chen Florida International University
Mohammed Elgarhy
Mohammed Elgarhy Egyptian Chinese University
Muhammad Shahbaz
Muhammad Shahbaz Beijing Institute of Technology
James V. Zidek
James V. Zidek University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Mathematics in the USA, complementary online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many find that combining their mathematical skills with business acumen offers a competitive edge. When exploring options, consider how transfer credits for online mba programs can simplify your education path and reduce time to completion.

Data-driven roles are increasingly prominent, making a masters data analytics degree a valuable addition. This program builds on mathematical foundations and enhances your ability to interpret complex data, which is highly sought after in tech, finance, and research sectors.

For those aiming to strengthen leadership and management skills, identifying the easiest mba program to get into could be a strategic choice. These programs often balance rigorous study with accessible admission standards, allowing students to progress without unnecessary hurdles.

Additionally, easy online mba options provide flexible learning environments that accommodate working professionals or those with other commitments. Exploring easy online mba degree programs can help you find a curriculum that fits your lifestyle without compromising quality.

By aligning your Mathematics background with these related degrees, you can tailor your career pathway to your goals while optimizing educational investments.

Best Scientists Citing B. M. Golam Kibria

Recently Published Articles