What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Sedimentary rock
- Igneous rock
- Tectonics
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Geochemistry, Gneiss, Shear zone, Paleontology and Metamorphism.
His study on Geochemistry is mostly dedicated to connecting different topics, such as Proterozoic.
His Gneiss study introduces a deeper knowledge of Petrology.
The subject of his Shear zone research is within the realm of Seismology.
As part of his studies on Paleontology, Arild Andresen often connects relevant areas like Geomorphology.
As a member of one scientific family, Arild Andresen mostly works in the field of Metamorphism, focusing on Orogeny and, on occasion, Metamorphic rock, Allochthon, Earth science and Magmatism.
His most cited work include:
- Late Cryogenian-Ediacaran history of the Arabian-Nubian Shield: A review of depositional, plutonic, structural, and tectonic events in the closing stages of the northern East African Orogen (378 citations)
- U–Pb TIMS age constraints on the evolution of the Neoproterozoic Meatiq Gneiss Dome, Eastern Desert, Egypt (128 citations)
- Caledonian sole thrust of central East Greenland: A crustal-scale Devonian extensional detachment? (82 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary scientific interests are in Geochemistry, Paleontology, Devonian, Zircon and Metamorphism.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Nappe, Petrology and Terrane.
His Paleontology research focuses on subjects like Seismology, which are linked to Fold.
His Devonian study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Structural basin, Foreland basin, Carboniferous and Archean.
His studies in Zircon integrate themes in fields like Sedimentary depositional environment, Crust, Provenance and Geochronology.
His Metamorphism research incorporates elements of Orogeny, Eclogite, Granulite, Precambrian and Metamorphic facies.
He most often published in these fields:
- Geochemistry (49.49%)
- Paleontology (43.43%)
- Devonian (20.20%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2020)?
- Geochemistry (49.49%)
- Paleontology (43.43%)
- Zircon (20.20%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Geochemistry, Paleontology, Zircon, Crust and Rift are his primary areas of study.
His research on Geochemistry focuses in particular on Metamorphic rock.
His research investigates the connection with Metamorphic rock and areas like Metamorphic facies which intersect with concerns in Metamorphism and Gneiss.
His study in the fields of Fault, Baltica and Ordovician under the domain of Paleontology overlaps with other disciplines such as Norwegian and Margin.
His Zircon research includes themes of Biotite and Geochronology.
As a part of the same scientific family, Arild Andresen mostly works in the field of Rift, focusing on Sinistral and dextral and, on occasion, Shear zone.
Between 2014 and 2020, his most popular works were:
- Lu–Hf and O isotopic compositions on single zircons from the North Eastern Desert of Egypt, Arabian–Nubian Shield: Implications for crustal evolution (34 citations)
- Structural Inheritance and Rapid Rift‐Length Establishment in a Multiphase Rift: The East Greenland Rift System and its Caledonian Orogenic Ancestry (32 citations)
- Single zircon Hf–O isotope constraints on the origin of A-type granites from the Jabal Al-Hassir ring complex, Saudi Arabia (18 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Sedimentary rock
- Igneous rock
- Tectonics
His scientific interests lie mostly in Zircon, Geochemistry, Crust, Protolith and Petrology.
His Zircon study combines topics in areas such as Sedimentary rock, Igneous differentiation, Mantle and Shield.
His work on Partial melting as part of general Geochemistry research is often related to Magma, thus linking different fields of science.
His Crust research integrates issues from Mylonite, Shear, Metamorphism, Seismology and Gneiss.
His research integrates issues of Shear zone and Continental crust in his study of Petrology.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
