World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
44
Citations
7938
World Ranking
7141
National Ranking
554

Anna Barnes publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna Barnes sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 133 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Anna Barnes D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna Barnes sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anna Barnes is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a strong focus on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Infectious Diseases, Health Informatics, Genetics, and Nuclear and High Energy Physics.

Their work covers a variety of main topics, including:

  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • MRI in cancer diagnosis
  • Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics

Anna Barnes has contributed to research published across several frequent venues, such as:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • Physical Review Letters
  • The Lancet. Gastroenterology & Hepatology
  • Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Anna Barnes include:

  • "Lawson Criterion for Ignition Exceeded in an Inertial Fusion Experiment" (2022, Physical Review Letters)
  • "Achievement of Target Gain Larger than Unity in an Inertial Fusion Experiment" (2024, Physical Review Letters)
  • "COVID-19 vaccine-induced antibody responses in immunosuppressed patients with inflammatory bowel disease (VIP): a multicentre, prospective, case-control study" (2022, The Lancet. Gastroenterology & Hepatology)
  • "OUP accepted manuscript" (2020, Brain)
  • "COVID-19 vaccine-induced antibody and T-cell responses in immunosuppressed patients with inflammatory bowel disease after the third vaccine dose (VIP): a multicentre, prospective, case-control study" (2022, The Lancet. Gastroenterology & Hepatology)

Frequent co-authors in Anna Barnes's publications include:

  • Sébastien Ourselin
  • David M. Cash
  • John Dickson
  • Christopher Lane
  • Sarah M. Buchanan

Best Publications

  • FDG PET in the differential diagnosis of parkinsonian disorders

    Thomas Eckert;Anna Barnes;Vijay Dhawan;Vijay Dhawan;Vijay Dhawan;Steve Frucht

  • Abnormal structure of frontostriatal brain systems is associated with aspects of impulsivity and compulsivity in cocaine dependence

    Karen D. Ersche;Anna Barnes;P. Simon Jones;Sharon Morein-Zamir

  • Attenuation correction synthesis for hybrid PET-MR scanners: application to brain studies.

    Ninon Burgos;M. Jorge Cardoso;Kris Thielemans;Marc Modat

  • Brain anatomy and its relationship to behavior in adults with autism spectrum disorder: a multicenter magnetic resonance imaging study.

    Christine Ecker;John Suckling;Sean C. Deoni;Michael V. Lombardo

  • Identification of a Biological Signature for Schizophrenia in Serum

    E Schwarz;P C Guest;H Rahmoune;L W Harris

  • Differential Cortical and Subcortical Activations in Learning Rotations and Gains for Reaching: A PET Study

    John W. Krakauer;Maria Felice Ghilardi;Marc Mentis;Anna Barnes

  • Associations between blood pressure across adulthood and late-life brain structure and pathology in the neuroscience substudy of the 1946 British birth cohort (Insight 46): an epidemiological study.

    Christopher A Lane;Josephine Barnes;Jennifer M Nicholas;Carole H Sudre

  • Network modulation by the subthalamic nucleus in the treatment of Parkinson's disease

    Maja Trošt;Sherwin Su;Philip Su;Ruoh-Fang Yen

  • Diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of simultaneous hybrid 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging in cardiac sarcoidosis.

    Eleanor C Wicks;Eleanor C Wicks;Eleanor C Wicks;Leon J Menezes;Leon J Menezes;Leon J Menezes;Anna Barnes;Anna Barnes;Saidi A Mohiddin;Saidi A Mohiddin

  • Endogenous Human Brain Dynamics Recover Slowly Following Cognitive Effort

    Anna Barnes;Edward T. Bullmore;John Suckling

  • Generic aspects of complexity in brain imaging data and other biological systems.

    Edward Bullmore;Anna Barnes;Danielle S Bassett;Alexander Fornito;Alexander Fornito

  • Monofractal and multifractal dynamics of low frequency endogenous brain oscillations in functional MRI

    Alle-Meije Wink;Ed Bullmore;Ed Bullmore;Anna Barnes;Frederic Bernard

  • Longitudinal changes in total brain volume in schizophrenia: relation to symptom severity, cognition and antipsychotic medication

    Juha Veijola;Joyce Y. Guo;Jani S. Moilanen;Erika Jääskeläinen

  • Caudate nucleus: influence of dopaminergic input on sequence learning and brain activation in Parkinsonism.

    Maren Carbon;Yilong Ma;Anna Barnes;Vijay Dhawan

  • Influence of Compulsivity of Drug Abuse on Dopaminergic Modulation of Attentional Bias in Stimulant Dependence

    Karen D. Ersche;Edward T. Bullmore;Kevin J. Craig;Shaila S. Shabbir

  • Endogenous multifractal brain dynamics are modulated by age, cholinergic blockade and cognitive performance.

    John Suckling;Alle Meije Wink;Frederic A. Bernard;Anna Barnes

  • The Camino intracranial pressure sensor: is it optimal technology? An internal audit with a review of current intracranial pressure monitoring technologies.

    Ian Piper;Anna Barnes;Douglas Smith;Laurence Dunn

  • PET Reconstruction With an Anatomical MRI Prior Using Parallel Level Sets

    Matthias J. Ehrhardt;Pawel Markiewicz;Maria Liljeroth;Anna Barnes

  • UK quantitative WB-DWI technical workgroup: Consensus meeting recommendations on optimisation, quality control, processing and analysis of quantitative whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging for cancer

    Anna Barnes;Roberto Alonzi;Matthew Blackledge;Geoff Charles-Edwards;Geoff Charles-Edwards

  • Brain tissue volume changes following weight gain in adults with anorexia nervosa

    Christina A. Roberto;Christina A. Roberto;Laurel Mayer;Adam M. Brickman;Anna Barnes

  • Brain activity associated with stimulation therapy of the visual borderzone in hemianopic stroke patients.

    Randolph S. Marshall;John J. Ferrera;Anna Barnes;Xian Zhang

Frequent Co-Authors

Sebastien Ourselin
Sebastien Ourselin King's College London
John Suckling
John Suckling University of Cambridge
Marc Modat
Marc Modat King's College London
Jonathan M. Schott
Jonathan M. Schott University College London
Edward T. Bullmore
Edward T. Bullmore King's College London
Nick C. Fox
Nick C. Fox University College London
Jouko Miettunen
Jouko Miettunen Oulu University Hospital
David L. Thomas
David L. Thomas Johns Hopkins University
Matti Isohanni
Matti Isohanni University of Oulu
Marcus Richards
Marcus Richards University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Anna Barnes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles