What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Internal medicine
- Neuroscience
- Epilepsy
Andreas Hufnagel mainly investigates Epilepsy, Surgery, Magnetic resonance imaging, Temporal lobe and Epilepsy surgery.
His Epilepsy research includes themes of Astrocytoma, Oligodendroglioma and Electroencephalography.
His Surgery study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Stroke and Carotid artery dissection.
Andreas Hufnagel studied Magnetic resonance imaging and Central nervous system disease that intersect with Histopathology, Surgical treatment and Anaplastic Ganglioglioma.
His Temporal lobe study incorporates themes from Glioma, Surgical pathology, Pathology, Leptomeninges and Hippocampal formation.
His Epilepsy surgery study combines topics in areas such as Central sulcus, Somatosensory evoked potential, Hemiparesis, Evoked potential and Aphasia.
His most cited work include:
- Gangliogliomas: clinical, radiological, and histopathological findings in 51 patients. (205 citations)
- Application of transcranial magnetic stimulation in treatment of drug‐resistant major depression—a report of two cases (195 citations)
- Functional results after resective procedures involving the supplementary motor area (179 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Andreas Hufnagel spends much of his time researching Epilepsy, Temporal lobe, Anesthesia, Electroencephalography and Ictal.
His Epilepsy research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Central nervous system disease, Surgery, Magnetic resonance imaging and Nuclear medicine.
His Temporal lobe research incorporates themes from Hippocampal formation, Astrocytoma, Glioma and Hippocampus.
His Anesthesia research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Subdural electrodes and Transcranial magnetic stimulation, Internal medicine, Stimulation.
In general Electroencephalography, his work in Electrocorticography and Source reconstruction is often linked to Dipole and Impulse linking many areas of study.
Andreas Hufnagel has included themes like Parahippocampal gyrus and Perfusion in his Ictal study.
He most often published in these fields:
- Epilepsy (60.56%)
- Temporal lobe (33.80%)
- Anesthesia (30.99%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2002-2014)?
- Epilepsy (60.56%)
- Anesthesia (30.99%)
- Ictal (23.94%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His main research concerns Epilepsy, Anesthesia, Ictal, Neuroscience and Internal medicine.
His Epilepsy research includes elements of Genetics, Autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy and Acetylcholine receptor.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Diffusion MRI and Comorbidity.
The concepts of his Ictal study are interwoven with issues in Nuclear medicine, Parahippocampal gyrus, Temporal lobe, Effective diffusion coefficient and Epilepsy surgery.
Epilepsy surgery is a subfield of Electroencephalography that Andreas Hufnagel studies.
His work in Electroencephalography addresses issues such as Central nervous system disease, which are connected to fields such as Hippocampus.
Between 2002 and 2014, his most popular works were:
- Brain Diffusion after Single Seizures (90 citations)
- Expression time course and spatial distribution of activated caspase-3 after experimental status epilepticus: contribution of delayed neuronal cell death to seizure-induced neuronal injury. (70 citations)
- A new Chrna4 mutation with low penetrance in nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy. (68 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Internal medicine
- Neuroscience
- Psychiatry
Andreas Hufnagel mostly deals with Epilepsy, Acetylcholine receptor, Penetrance, Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and Allele.
The various areas that he examines in his Epilepsy study include Effective diffusion coefficient and Magnetic resonance imaging.
His work on Autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy as part of his general Acetylcholine receptor study is frequently connected to Mutation, thereby bridging the divide between different branches of science.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
