Data Sources and Ranking Criteria
The 4th edition of the Research.com Best Rising Stars of Science in Iran, Islamic Republic Of Ranking utilizes a comprehensive and meticulous approach to ensure accuracy and relevance in highlighting emerging scientific talent. The foundational data for this ranking is drawn primarily from OpenAlex and CrossRef, supplemented by multiple other reputable bibliometric data sources.
A strict eligibility criterion was implemented: only scientists whose earliest publication dates back 12 or fewer years from the point of analysis have been considered, ensuring that the ranking reflects the achievements of early-career researchers. The bibliometric data underpinning the citation-based metrics for this edition were collected on 2024-11-27. The position of each scientist within the ranking is directly based on their H-index, ensuring a quantitative and comparable measure of academic impact.
Scope and Selection Process
A total of 279,971 scientist profiles—sourced from diverse, authoritative bibliometric databases—were rigorously examined across all major scientific disciplines. The threshold H-index for inclusion was set with respect to individual research areas, typically at a minimum of 30 or 40, reflecting the competitive nature of different scientific fields. In addition to citation metrics, notable awards and professional achievements specific to each researcher's field were also considered as supplementary indicators of distinction.
Ultimately, only the top 1,000 scientists with the highest H-index values are featured in the final ranking, underscoring the selectivity and prestige associated with this distinction.
Verification and Quality Assurance Methods
Recognizing the inherent limitations of raw bibliometric data, the Research.com team has implemented robust additional verification practices to ensure the integrity of the ranking. All candidate profiles underwent thorough manual review and were cross-referenced with publications registered in a wide array of trusted, reputable sources.
Although the total number of papers published in leading journals and conference proceedings does not influence a researcher’s position in the ranking, it remains a valuable secondary signal of a scientist’s contribution to their field. The ranking relies primarily on researcher H-index values as obtained from OpenAlex and CrossRef—both recognized leaders in bibliometric analytics within the academic community.
For comprehensive details on the methodology, please visit our methodology page.
Research.com’s Mission and Vision
At Research.com, we are committed to the principle that all scientists—irrespective of their academic seniority or tenure—deserve equitable recognition and the opportunity to celebrate their contributions. Through this ranking, we aspire to inspire established scholars, prospective researchers, and institutional decision-makers worldwide by showcasing the achievements of those in the early stages of their academic journeys.
It is our hope that this initiative will play a role in fostering broader opportunities and greater equity within the global scientific community, empowering the next generation of research leaders.
