A scientist's position within the ranking is determined by their D-index (Discipline H-index), a citation metric that considers only the publications and citations relevant to the specific discipline under evaluation. This method ensures that the assessment reflects the researcher's contribution expressly within the domain of Business and Management, providing a focused and fair measure of scholarly impact.
Scope of Research and Eligibility Criteria
The ranking draws upon an extensive dataset, examining a total of 279,971 scientist profiles identified across a vast array of bibliometric data sources that span all academic disciplines. Within this comprehensive pool, 2,483 scientists specializing in Business and Management were specifically analyzed.
To qualify for inclusion in the Business and Management ranking, a scientist was required to meet stringent criteria. Primarily, their D-index had to be at least 30, ensuring that only researchers with substantial academic contributions were considered. Additionally, a majority of their tier publications—those recognized as having significant scholarly influence—needed to be within the Business and Management discipline. Beyond bibliometrics, researchers’ notable awards and achievements within the field were also factored into the evaluation.
The D-index threshold is not arbitrary; it is set in increments of 10 according to the estimated total number of scholars in each discipline, with the explicit goal of incorporating the top 1% of leading experts for that field. Furthermore, in order to maintain consistency and disciplinary focus, a close proximity—specifically 30% or less—between a scientist's overall H-index and their discipline-specific D-index was required. This condition helps to ensure the ranking reflects genuine depth of expertise within Business and Management.
Verification and Integrity of the Ranking
Recognizing that raw bibliometric data cannot serve as an absolute measure to evaluate the scholarly output of researchers, the team behind this ranking undertook extensive manual verification processes. Each scientist’s profile was carefully checked and cross-correlated against their published works in a wide range of trustworthy academic sources. This rigorous vetting is aimed at minimizing errors and enhancing the credibility of the ranking.
Although the number of papers published in prominent journals and prestigious conference proceedings does not directly contribute to the position within the Research.com ranking, it is regarded as a valuable secondary indicator of a scientist’s impact and influence within a specific research area.
The final position of researchers is fundamentally determined by their D-index, calculated from data curated through the most prominent bibliometric platforms available to the academic community, OpenAlex and CrossRef. For a comprehensive understanding of the methodologies applied in compiling this ranking, readers are encouraged to consult our methodology page.
Research.com’s Mission and Vision
The creation of this ranking aligns with Research.com’s broader mission to inspire researchers, institutions, companies, and policymakers around the globe to gain insight into the trajectories of leading experts. By providing a transparent and data-driven overview of top scientists, the platform fosters awareness within the global scientific community about who the foremost contributors are in specific fields of study, across different countries, and within distinct research institutions.
Through meticulous data collection, rigorous validation, and transparent disclosure, Research.com aims to facilitate better collaboration and strategic decision-making, ultimately accelerating the advancement of science and innovation worldwide.
