Data Sources and Citation Metrics
The 5th edition of the Research.com Best Business and Management Scientists in Ghana Ranking is constructed using comprehensive and reliable bibliometric data primarily sourced from OpenAlex and CrossRef, complemented by multiple other reputable data repositories. The citation-based metrics that underpin this ranking were collected on January 12, 2026, ensuring an up-to-date and robust dataset for accurate scholarly evaluation. A researcher’s position in the ranking is determined by their D-index (Discipline H-index), a specialized metric that includes only those publications and citations pertinent to the evaluated discipline of Business and Management. This approach ensures that the ranking reflects a focused and discipline-specific measure of scientific impact.
Scope of Research and Qualification Criteria
The ranking evaluates a total of 279,971 scientist profiles derived from a variety of bibliometric databases encompassing all academic disciplines. Within this comprehensive pool, the ranking specifically highlights 3 scientists identified in the field of Business and Management from Ghana. To qualify for inclusion, a scientist must have a D-index of at least 30, with the majority of their tier publications concentrated explicitly in Business and Management. Consideration is also given to scientists’ awards and achievements within the discipline, providing a well-rounded assessment of research leadership.
The threshold for D-index selection is calibrated in increments of 10, based on the total estimated scholar population for each respective discipline. This method ensures that the ranking inclusively captures the top 1% of leading scholars while maintaining disciplinary relevance. Additionally, to safeguard disciplinary specificity, a proximity limit of 30% or less between a scientist's general H-index and their D-index is required, ensuring a consistent research focus within the field of Business and Management.
Verification and Evaluation Practices
Recognizing that raw bibliometric data alone cannot serve as an absolute measure of a scholar’s output, the Research.com team has implemented rigorous manual verification protocols. Each scientist’s profile has been thoroughly cross-referenced against publications from a broad spectrum of trustworthy academic sources to corroborate accuracy. While the number of publications in premier journals and conference proceedings does not directly influence a researcher's ranking position, it serves as a valuable secondary indicator of the scholar’s contribution and influence within Business and Management research.
The D-index, calculated from OpenAlex and CrossRef data—two of the most prominent and widely respected bibliometric databases accessible to the academic community—is the primary metric establishing the ranking order. Readers and stakeholders are encouraged to consult our methodology page for detailed insights into the rigorous processes and standards that govern the creation of this ranking.
Research.com’s Mission and Objectives
Research.com undertakes this rigorous ranking initiative with the mission to inspire researchers, industry leaders, and policymakers globally to identify and understand the trajectories of top scientific minds. The ranking serves as a vital channel for the global scientific community to recognize leading experts operating in specific fields of inquiry, within particular countries, and across diverse academic institutions. By fostering transparency and highlighting excellence, Research.com endeavors to advance the collective knowledge ecosystem and catalyze informed collaborations and policy decisions worldwide.
