Social Psychological and Personality Science

Top Research Topics at Social Psychological and Personality Science?

The journal is mainly concerned with subjects like Social psychology, Developmental psychology, Personality, Cognitive psychology and Perception. Topics in Social psychology explored in the journal were investigated in conjunction with research in Morality, Well-being and Social perception. The Personality works, particularly on Big Five personality traits are tackled in the journal.

• Social psychology (71.17%)
• Developmental psychology (17.94%)
• Personality (9.23%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

• Equivalence tests : a practical primer for t tests, correlations, and meta-analyses (668 citations)
• Deliberate Practice Spells Success: Why Grittier Competitors Triumph at the National Spelling Bee (324 citations)
• Dead and Alive: Beliefs in Contradictory Conspiracy Theories (272 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at Social Psychological and Personality Science:

The journal articles facilitate discussions on Social psychology, Developmental psychology, Personality, Big Five personality traits and Morality. The most cited publications explore topics in Social psychology which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Test (assessment), Well-being and Human factors and ergonomics. The Developmental psychology research presented in the published papers focuses mostly on Clinical psychology and, on occasion, topics in Anxiety and Narcissism.

What topics the last edition of the journal is best known for?

• Social psychology
• Cognition
• Social science

The previous edition focused in particular on these issues:

Social psychology, Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak, Cognitive psychology and Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are the subjects of interest in Social Psychological and Personality Science. In it, Romance and Perception, Social perception are investigated in conjunction with one another to address concerns in Social psychology research. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) study tackled is connected to the field of Well-being.

Research in Personality and the interrelating topic of Developmental psychology were among the subjects of interest in the 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak studies discussed in Social Psychological and Personality Science. The Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) works featured in it incorporate elements from Coronavirus, Demography and Clinical psychology. The study on Pandemic presented in it intersects with the topics under Criminology.

The most cited articles from the last journal are:

• Adaptive and Dark Personality in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Predicting Health-Behavior Endorsement and the Appeal of Public-Health Messages (40 citations)
• Resolving the Puzzle of Conspiracy Worldview and Political Activism: Belief in Secret Plots Decreases Normative but Increases Nonnormative Political Engagement: (29 citations)
• Measuring Realistic and Symbolic Threats of COVID-19 and Their Unique Impacts on Well-Being and Adherence to Public Health Behaviors (23 citations)

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing in Social Psychological and Personality Science (based on the number of publications) are:

• Adam D. Galinsky (16 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition,
• Emily A. Impett (15 papers) published 4 papers at the last edition, 3 more than at the previous edition,
• Chris G. Sibley (13 papers) published 6 papers at the last edition,
• Amy Muise (11 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition,
• Elizabeth W. Dunn (11 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in Social Psychological and Personality Science (based on the number of publications) are:

• University of Toronto (57 papers) published 8 papers at the last edition, 5 more than at the previous edition,
• Northwestern University (48 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• Stanford University (37 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
• VU University Amsterdam (35 papers) published 8 papers at the last edition, 5 more than at the previous edition,
• University of California, Los Angeles (35 papers) published 6 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 2.95% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 19.13% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 16.96% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 28.26% of all publications and 35.65% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Career Path and Licensure Requirement for Psychologists in Wisconsin

Becoming a psychologist in Wisconsin entails rigorous educational pursuits and years of experience. The journey towards earning your place among the state's licensed psychologists will always begin with a bachelor’s degree in psychology or a related field. Upon completion, some individuals may continue to a master’s program, although it is common for many to head straight for a doctoral program in psychology as it is a more preferable route in the field of psychology. Postgraduate programs typically take about five to seven years to complete depending on full-time or part-time status, specializations, and the time it takes to complete a dissertation. Further to graduation is a period of supervised work experience.

Steps towards licensure include submitting an application to the Wisconsin Department of Safety and Professional Services, completing a background check and passing the Examination for the Professional Practice of Psychology (EPPP). Furthermore, candidates are required to have accumulated 3,200 hours of professional experience before licensure, at least 1,500 of which must be after receiving a doctorate degree. Lastly, the state also requires applicants to pass the Wisconsin Jurisprudence Examination that covers the state’s laws as they pertain to the practice of psychology.

Deepening your understanding on how to become a Wisconsin psychologist can aid in setting reasonable timelines and expectations for your career journey. For a more comprehensive guide on the licensure process and requirements, you may visit this page.

In the field of Social Psychological and Personality Science, knowing your career path and the necessary requirements will be beneficial in creating significant advancements in your field.