| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medicine | 882 | 158 | 242 | 25 |
The aim of Shock is to expand the discussion of research in Internal medicine, Immunology, Sepsis, Endocrinology and Anesthesia. The work on Internal medicine tackled in it brings together disciplines like Gastroenterology, Intensive care and Cardiology. The journal tackles issues in Immunology, particularly in the topics of Inflammation, Cytokine, Tumor necrosis factor alpha, Immune system and Proinflammatory cytokine.
While work presented in Shock provided substantial information on Sepsis, it also covered topics in Pharmacology and Intensive care medicine. It focuses on Pharmacology research which is adjacent to topics in Nitric oxide. Shock holds forums on Anesthesia that merges themes from other disciplines such as Mean arterial pressure, Surgery and Blood pressure.
The study on Ischemia featured in the journal expounds on the topic of Reperfusion injury in particular.
The journal articles aim to foster the development of research in Sepsis, Internal medicine, Immunology, Intensive care and Endocrinology. The journal publications explore topics in Sepsis which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Intensive care unit, Intensive care medicine and Pharmacology. The most cited articles hold forums on Internal medicine that merge themes from other disciplines such as Gastroenterology, Surgery and Cardiology.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Shock (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Shock (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 8.96% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 10.66% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 10.25% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 11.07% of all publications and 68.03% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Providing our readers with a well-rounded understanding of shock and related topics is a core part of our commitment. Aside from the invaluable insights you can glean from the journal articles we publish weekly, investing in formal studies can help deepen your knowledge base. For those who are aiming to study nurse practitioner programs with a focus on shock management and related fields, selecting the right program can have a significant impact on your career trajectory. To aid in your selection process, we recommend checking out the best np programs in oregon. Ranking metrics include academic reputation, program depth, and graduate success, which means they highlight programs that are both academically sound and diffuse graduates into successful careers across Oregon and beyond. This program has been vetted to ensure a timely, rigorous, and field-informed curriculum fit for aspiring healthcare professionals.
Georgios Renieris;Konstantina Katrini;Christina Damoulari;Karolina Akinosoglou
(2020)Sara Fernández;Ana B Moreno-Castaño;Marta Palomo;Julia Martinez-Sanchez
(2021)Dijoia B Darden;Rhonda Bacher;Maigan A Brusko;Parker Knight
(2021)Remi Beunders;Roger van Groenendael;Guus P Leijte;Matthijs Kox
(2020)Marcin F. Osuchowski;Federico Aletti;Jean Marc Cavaillon;Stefanie B. Flohé
(2020)Christopher Cameron McCoy;Bryan A. Cotton;Megan Brenner;Derek Roberts
(2020)Julie Goswami;Taleen A. MacArthur;Meera Sridharan;Rajiv K. Pruthi
(2021)Jason B Brill;Bryan A Cotton;Megan Brenner;Juan Duchesne
(2021)Akram Mohammed;Franco Van Wyk;Lokesh K. Chinthala;Anahita Khojandi
(2020)For students interested in medicine, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities beyond traditional clinical roles. One popular path is pursuing an online nutrition degree, which equips graduates to advise on diet and wellness, complementing medical knowledge with a focus on preventive care.
Healthcare administration is another crucial field, and accredited education ensures quality and credibility. Prospective leaders can consider cahme-accredited online mha programs that combine flexibility with industry-recognized standards to prepare students for managing complex healthcare systems.
For advanced practice nurses looking to enhance their expertise without extensive clinical hours, online dnp programs without clinicals offer a focused doctorate pathway. These programs emphasize leadership, evidence-based practice, and healthcare policy rather than hands-on patient care.
Those aiming for academic or executive roles in healthcare can pursue a phd in healthcare management, designed to develop strategic thinking and research skills necessary for high-level administration and innovation in healthcare delivery.
