| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences and Humanities | 280 | 34 | 61 | 13 |
| Medicine | 1921 | 64 | 60 | 13 |
The journal investigates studies in Health administration, Health economics, Public health, MEDLINE and Family medicine. Health administration research presented in it encompasses a variety of subjects, including Quality of Life Research, Medical education and Quality of life (healthcare). It aims to form a more comprehensive understanding of the field by integrating disciplines like Quality of Life Research and Patient preference.
While work presented in The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research provided substantial information on Health economics, it also covered topics in Public relations, Patient participation, Intensive care medicine, Focus group and Preference. Public health research featured in The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research incorporates concerns from various other topics such as Psychiatry, Internal medicine, Disease, Clinical psychology and Physical therapy. The study on Physical therapy presented is investigated in conjunction with research in Quality of life.
The MEDLINE research dealing mostly with CINAHL is the focus of the journal. The study on Family medicine presented in the journal intersects with subjects under the field of Patient satisfaction. Health care study tackled is connected to the field of Psychological intervention.
The journal publications are organized to address concerns in the fields of Health administration, Health economics, MEDLINE, Public health and Health care. While the journal publications focused on Health administration, they were also able to explore topics like Clinical psychology, Preference, Family medicine and Quality of life (healthcare). The study of Health economics in the journal papers encompasses disciplines such as Patient participation, as well as fields such as Alternative medicine, all of which overlap with one another.
The concepts of Health administration, Health economics, Public health, Family medicine and MEDLINE are tackled in the journal. In addition to Health administration research, The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research aims to explore topics under Psychological intervention, Respondent and Focus group. Concepts in Disease, as well as related topics in Quality of life and Patient-reported outcome, are covered in the Health economics research presented in The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.
It discusses concepts in Quality of Life Research under Public health and how they intertwine with disciplines like Perspective (graphical). The presented research on Family medicine deals specifically with Clinical trial but it also addresses topics in Observational study. The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research tackles research in Systematic review as part of the general discipline of MEDLINE, however, it also discusses concepts in Terminology.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 7.77% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 38.95% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 21.05% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 21.05% of all publications and 18.95% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
While this article focuses on the interconnected research areas, highly-cited papers, and the collective experience of authors in The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research journal, it's also valuable to consider the career pathways in this discipline. Throughout their careers, researchers contribute to the wealth of knowledge in Health Administration, Health Economics, Public Health, MEDLINE, and Family Medicine. In turn, this creates opportunities for advancements not only in their academic journey but also in their professional roles. For instance, some Health Administration researchers may opt to utilize their understanding in more specialized fields such as substance abuse counseling.
If you are interested in such a career path, comprehending the prerequisites and obligations of the role is crucial. Consider reviewing this guide on How to become a licensed substance abuse counselor in South Carolina. It provides illuminating insights into the academic requirements, potential career progression, practical experiences, and the rewarding impact such professionals make in society.
Indeed, the field of Patient-Centered Outcome Research is wide and varied, with numerous potential areas for specialization and professional growth.
Ilene L Hollin;Benjamin M Craig;Joanna Coast;Kathleen Beusterien
(2020)Stacy M. Carter;Patti Shih;Jane Williams;Chris Degeling
(2021)Vasiliki Chounta;Edgar T. Overton;Anthony Mills;Susan Swindells
(2021)Alison Pearce;Mark Harrison;Verity Watson;Deborah J Street
(2021)Lynda C Doward;Maria-Magdalena Balp;James Twiss;Christina Slota
(2021)Edouard Louis;Juan M Ramos-Goñi;Jesus Cuervo;Uri Kopylov;Uri Kopylov
(2020)Eline van Overbeeke;Valérie Forrester;Steven Simoens;Isabelle Huys
(2021)Sophie Staniszewska;Edward M. Hill;Richard Grant;Peter Grove
(2021)For those interested in medical fields but seeking alternative routes, several related online degrees offer flexible and accessible options. Nursing remains a popular choice, and discovering the easiest nursing schools can provide a practical pathway to start a healthcare career quickly. These programs often balance rigor with accessibility, making them ideal for many aspiring healthcare workers.
Beyond clinical roles, healthcare administration offers diverse career opportunities. Pursuing a degree in healthcare administration online allows students to develop the business, leadership, and management skills needed to navigate the complex healthcare system. Accelerated programs especially appeal to those eager to enter the field efficiently.
Cost being a significant factor, numerous affordable options exist for those interested in administrative roles. Exploring the online healthcare administration programs can help candidates find quality education without the hefty price tag, enabling them to advance their careers without excessive financial burden.
For nursing professionals seeking advanced roles, an online nurse practitioner degree offers a flexible route to specialize and enhance clinical skills. Completing such programs online provides a convenient way to balance education with professional or personal responsibilities.
