| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 365 | 18 | 31 | 6 |
| Medicine | 2999 | 14 | 31 | 6 |
The scientific interests tackled in the journal are Internal medicine, Pediatrics, Disease, Surgery and Pathology. In Neurologia, Gastroenterology and Cardiology are investigated in conjunction with one another to address concerns in Internal medicine research.
The journal articles are mainly concerned with subjects like Dementia, Disease, Clinical psychology, Stroke and Pediatrics. The published articles with studies in Dementia featured incorporate elements of Psychiatry, Cognition, Cognitive impairment and Gerontology. The discussions in the most cited articles emphasized the topic of Disease in an attempt to further explore the field of Internal medicine.
The journal is mainly concerned with subjects like Internal medicine, MEDLINE, Humanities, Text mining and In patient. The main emphasis of it is the research on Internal medicine, emphasizing the topic of Stroke. MEDLINE research discussed connects with the study of Pediatrics.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Neurologia (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Neurologia (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 49.01% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 42.23% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 8.74% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 19.42% of all publications and 29.61% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
For those passionate about neurology research, several career paths can be considered. While many Neurologia researchers may choose academic or clinical roles, some might be interested in applying their skills in a more specialized setting, such as a Speech-Language Pathologist. Speech-Language Pathologists diagnose and treat communication and swallowing disorders in patients, contributing significantly to our understanding of neurological conditions and their impacts on speech and language.
If you're based in Minnesota and considering this career path, there are specific requirements and steps to become fully qualified. To be a speech therapist, you'll need not only a deep understanding of biological and neurological sciences, but also mastery of therapeutic techniques and skills to work effectively with patients of all ages. To learn more about the prerequisites and process, visit how to become a speech therapist in Minnesota.
While the scientific research conducted at Neurologia may differ from the practical, clinical work of a speech therapist, the two fields are closely intertwined. Both rely on a bedrock of scientific knowledge, and breakthroughs in one can often lead to enhancements in the other. As such, a career as a Speech-Language Pathologist can be both personally rewarding and instrumentally beneficial to the wider neurological research community.
P.J. Serrano-Castro;G. Estivill-Torrús;P. Cabezudo-García;J.A. Reyes-Bueno
(2020)D. Bruno;A. Slachevsky;N. Fiorentino;D.S. Rueda
(2020)J. Matías-Guiu;J.A. Matias-Guiu;José Alvarez-Sabin;J. Ramon Ara
(2020)F Valldeoriola;F Grandas;J M Arbelo;M Blázquez Estrada
(2021)J. Matías-Guiu;J.A. Matias-Guiu;J. Alvarez-Sabin;J. Ramon Ara
(2020)C. González-Oria;R. Belvís;M.L. Cuadrado;S. Díaz-Insa
(2021)Matías-Guiu J;Matias-Guiu Ja;Alvarez-Sabin J;Ara
(2020)For those interested in medicine but seeking alternative career paths, medical coding and billing offer promising opportunities. Understanding the difference between cpc vs ccs certifications is essential for choosing the right credential to advance your career. Each certification opens different doors in the healthcare documentation field and impacts potential earnings.
If you’re curious about financial prospects, exploring what is medical coding salary reveals a competitive income range that reflects ongoing demand. This, paired with understanding is medical coding a good job, helps assess if this career suits your interests and lifestyle. The role blends healthcare knowledge with administrative skills, offering a balanced workload.
Additionally, pursuing degrees like health information management online programs provides a flexible way to build expertise. These programs equip students to manage healthcare data critical in hospitals and clinics nationwide, creating a stable career pathway in the rapidly evolving medical field.
