| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earth Science | 523 | 10 | 12 | 5 |
The journal primarily tackles Archaeology, Lithic technology, Prehistory, Knapping and Assemblage (archaeology). The studies in Archaeology featured incorporate elements of Flake and Ancient history.
The most cited publications investigate areas of study like Archaeology, Flake, Lithic technology, Knapping and Stone tool. Archaeology study tackled in the published papers is connected to the field of Scraper site. In addition to Lithic technology research, the journal articles aim to explore topics under Tool design, Environmental resource management and Morphology (biology).
The journal mostly deals with topics like Archaeology, Lithic technology, Experimental archaeology, Knapping and Prehistory. The journal connects the study in Archaeology with the closely related area of Range (biology). While the primary focus in Lithic technology is Lithic technology, it also dissects topics surrounding Mesolithic and Provenance as a whole.
Topics in Experimental archaeology were tackled in line with various other fields like Natural (archaeology), Material properties and Debitage. The journal focuses on Knapping but the discussions also offer insight into other areas such as Stone tool, Visual arts, Sound (geography) and Know-how. Prehistory research featured in Lithic technology incorporates concerns from various other topics such as Cultural artifact, Mainland, Point (typography) and Holocene.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Lithic technology (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Lithic technology (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 6.06% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 29.03% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 3.23% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 9.68% of all publications and 58.06% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Géraldine Fiers;Éva Halbrucker;Tim De Kock;Hans Vandendriessche
(2021)Irene Solano-Megías;José-Manuel Maíllo-Fernández;Juan Marín;David M. Martín-Perea
(2021)Ira Novoselsky;Leore Grosman;Gadi Herzlinger;Naama Goren-Inbar
(2020)For those interested in Earth Science, numerous online degree options offer specialized knowledge and flexible learning formats. Students often consider programs focused on geographic information systems technology. Exploring the top gis masters programs can provide insights into careers involving spatial data analysis and mapping, which are vital in environmental and geological studies.
Those leaning towards traditional Earth Science disciplines may find value in online geology programs. These programs cover foundational topics like mineralogy, paleontology, and tectonics and help prepare students for roles in research, conservation, and resource management.
While not directly Earth Science, understanding complementary fields such as behavior analysis can widen career prospects. The fast track aba masters online showcase how quickly one can acquire credentials to work in applied behavior analysis, highlighting the diversity of online graduate opportunities.
Lastly, navigating graduate school admissions requires awareness of factors like program competitiveness. Reviewing slp acceptance rate information provides useful perspective on acceptance challenges, applicable to Earth Science graduate programs and beyond.
