| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genetics | 85 | 24 | 32 | 11 |
| Microbiology | 99 | 173 | 185 | 21 |
The journal primarily tackles Genetics, Virology, Genotype, Phylogenetic tree and Gene. The Genetics study tackled is a key component of adjacent topics in the area of Genetic diversity. While Virology is the focus of it, it also provided insights into the studies of Molecular epidemiology and Strain (biology).
Infection, Genetics and Evolution explores issues in Genotype which can be linked to other research areas like Tuberculosis, Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Immunology. While work presented in it provided substantial information on Phylogenetic tree, it also covered topics in Evolutionary biology, Zoology and Phylogenetics. Discussions in Infection, Genetics and Evolution are anchored in the subject of Zoology and the similar topic of Ecology.
The work on Gene addressed in it expands to the thematically related Microbiology. Some problems in Microbiology that were presented in Infection, Genetics and Evolution overlapped with concepts under Multilocus sequence typing and Virulence. The study on Multilocus sequence typing presented is investigated in conjunction with research in Typing.
The most cited publications investigate studies in Genetics, Virology, Genotype, Phylogenetics and Molecular epidemiology. The studies tackled in the most cited publications, which mainly focus on Genetics, apply to Genetic diversity as well. Aside from discussions in Virology, the most cited papers also deal with the subject of Microbiology which intersects with Staphylococcus aureus and Multilocus sequence typing disciplines.
Infection, Genetics and Evolution primarily focuses on research topics in Genetics, Genome, Gene, Phylogenetic tree and Virology. It links adjacent topics like Genetics with Coronavirus. The journal holds forums on Genome that merges themes from other disciplines such as Pathogen, Computational biology and DNA sequencing.
It focuses on Gene as well as the interrelated topic of Microbiology. Infection, Genetics and Evolution facilitates discussions on Phylogenetic tree that incorporate concepts from other fields like Evolutionary biology, Genetic diversity, Phylogenetics and Genotype. Epitope and Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are some topics wherein Virology research discussed in Infection, Genetics and Evolution have an impact.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Infection, Genetics and Evolution (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Infection, Genetics and Evolution (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 5.03% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 16.14% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 3.70% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 12.43% of all publications and 67.72% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Unknown
(2020)Unknown
(2020)Manuela Sironi;Seyed E. Hasnain;Benjamin Rosenthal;Tung Phan
(2020)Roger Frutos;Jordi Serra-Cobo;Tianmu Chen;Christian A. Devaux
(2020)Johann D.D. Pitout;Johann D.D. Pitout;Thomas J. Finn
(2020)Javaid Ahmad Sheikh;Jasdeep Singh;Hina Singh;Salma Jamal
(2020)Fernando González-Candelas;Marie Anne Shaw;Tung Phan;Urmila Kulkarni-Kale
(2021)Pursuing a medical career in the USA often involves exploring various educational pathways, especially within the nursing field, which offers flexible online options. For those interested in advancing their nursing credentials, programs comparing chamberlain vs capella rn to bsn program highlight key differences in curriculum, cost, and clinical requirements, helping students select the best fit.
Once a Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) is obtained, many opt to further specialize by enrolling in the bsn to msn bridge programs. These affordable, flexible courses allow registered nurses to advance their education swiftly and open doors to leadership roles within healthcare systems.
For professionals concerned about clinical hours, the best online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements provide alternatives that focus on theoretical knowledge and can be completed remotely. This option is ideal for students balancing work and study commitments.
Additionally, those aiming for the highest nursing qualifications might consider the shortest dnp program online, which offers a streamlined path to a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree. This qualification prepares nurses for advanced clinical practice and leadership roles in healthcare innovation.
