| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medicine | 1669 | 75 | 131 | 15 |
European Journal of Ophthalmology covers a variety of subjects, including Ophthalmology, Surgery, Visual acuity, Glaucoma and Intraocular pressure. Among the topics covered in the journal are Ophthalmology and In patient. Surgery research discussed connects with the study of Retinal detachment.
Visual acuity works presented in it have a specific focus on Macular edema. The journal primarily discusses Glaucoma topics, particularly Open angle glaucoma and Ocular hypertension. Pars plana is a primary topic of Vitrectomy research in it.
Most of the works presented in European Journal of Ophthalmology deals with Retinal but it intersects with the subject of Retina. The journal features Eye disease research that overlaps with concepts in Retinopathy. The journal investigates Phacoemulsification research which frequently intersects with Intraocular lens.
The most cited publications tackle a plethora of topics, such as Ophthalmology, Surgery, Visual acuity, Glaucoma and Intraocular pressure. Ophthalmology research in the published articles connects with the study of Diabetic retinopathy. The most cited publications address concerns in Surgery which are intertwined with other disciplines, such as Retinopathy and Internal medicine.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in European Journal of Ophthalmology (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in European Journal of Ophthalmology (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 15.19% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 15.93% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 12.14% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 17.00% of all publications and 54.93% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
An interesting facet that could enhance our understanding of the journals' contributions is examining the educational background of the authors. By correlating where authors obtained their specialized training, such as in the best np programs in california, we can identify geographical and institutional bias or diversity in the published research. This analysis could also reveal whether specific educational programs have a significant influence on certain research topics. For example, authors who studied in renowned programs focused on Glaucoma research might contribute more to the Glaucoma topics in the European Journal of Ophthalmology. Therefore, looking into their educational backgrounds and their studies' focus could bring more depth to the understanding of the knowledge production and distribution in the field. In this section, we aim to provide a tentative analysis connecting authors to their educational background, examining the geographic and academic representation in the published articles in the European Journal of Ophthalmology.
János Németh;Beáta Tapasztó;Wagih A. Aclimandos;Philippe Kestelyn
(2021)Giacomo Panozzo;Maria Vittoria Cicinelli;Albert J. Augustin;Maurizio Battaglia Parodi
(2020)Albert J Augustin;Silvia Bopp;Martin Fechner;Frank Holz
(2020)Soufiane Souissi;Christophe Baudouin;Antoine Labbé;Pascale Hamard
(2021)Piotr Kanclerz;Jorge L Alio
(2021)Anne M Lynch;Naresh Mandava;Jennifer L Patnaik;Ashley A Frazer-Abel
(2020)Tetsuro Oshika;Yoshifumi Fujita;Atsushi Hirota;Mikio Inamura
(2020)Giacomo Panozzo;Giovanni Staurenghi;Giulia Dalla Mura;Diana Giannarelli
(2020)José F Costa;Paula Bompastor-Ramos;Marco Marques;Jorge Henriques
(2020)For those interested in the healthcare field beyond traditional medical studies, exploring related qualifications can open diverse career opportunities. Medical coding, for example, is a specialized area that involves translating healthcare services into standardized codes for insurance and billing purposes. Understanding the differences in medical coding certification can help aspiring professionals choose the right path based on cost, time investment, and career prospects.
If you're wondering how long does it take to become a medical coder, certification programs typically range from a few months to a year, making it a quicker option compared to traditional medicine. This flexibility appeals to those seeking to enter the healthcare industry efficiently.
Considering whether is medical coding a good career is essential. The role offers steady demand, decent salaries, and the opportunity to work remotely. However, it requires detail-oriented skills and staying updated with medical coding standards.
For a broader scope, pursuing a health information management online degree can equip students with skills in managing patient data and healthcare systems. This degree complements medical coding expertise and can lead to expanded administrative and leadership roles in healthcare settings.
