| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Environmental Sciences | 50 | 169 | 182 | 58 |
| Engineering and Technology | 158 | 61 | 64 | 36 |
Waste management, Environmental chemistry, Environmental engineering, Wastewater and Pollutant are the subjects of interest in Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. Waste management research discussed connects with the study of Environmental remediation. The concepts on Environmental chemistry presented in it can also apply to other research fields, including Soil water, Contamination, Biodegradation and Adsorption.
Issues in Environmental engineering were discussed, taking into consideration concepts from other disciplines like Water quality, Water pollution, Pollution and Groundwater. It connects the study in Wastewater with the closely related area of Effluent.
The most cited papers investigate areas of study like Waste management, Environmental chemistry, Environmental engineering, Wastewater and Sewage treatment. While the published papers focused on Waste management, they were also able to explore topics like Environmental remediation and Anaerobic digestion. The most cited papers with studies in Environmental engineering featured incorporate elements of Contamination, Soil contamination, Water pollution, Groundwater and Wetland.
Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology is mainly concerned with subjects like Environmental chemistry, Waste management, Pollutant, Environmental protection and Pulp and paper industry. The presented research on Environmental chemistry deals specifically with Toxicity but it also addresses topics in Detoxification. The study on Waste management featured in the journal expounds on the topic of Wastewater in particular.
Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology explores research in Pollutant and the adjacent study of Photocatalysis. The journal links adjacent topics like Environmental protection with Current (fluid). The study on Pulp and paper industry presented in the journal intersects with subjects under the field of Sewage treatment.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 1.47% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 24.63% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 12.69% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 13.43% of all publications and 49.25% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Baile Xu;Fei Liu;Zachary Cryder;Dan Huang
(2020)Taoufik El Rasafi;Abdallah Oukarroum;Abdelmajid Haddioui;Hocheol Song
(2020)Unknown
(2022)Arianna Callegari;Silvia Bolognesi;Daniele Cecconet;Andrea G. Capodaglio
(2020)Kumuduni Niroshika Palansooriya;Yi Yang;Yiu Fai Tsang;Binoy Sarkar
(2020)Yi Zhao;Qiu E. Yang;Xue Zhou;Feng-Hua Wang
(2021)Tharanga Bandara;Ashley Franks;Jianming Xu;Nanthi Bolan
(2020)Unknown
(2022)Ana Markic;Jean-Claude Gaertner;Nabila Gaertner-Mazouni;Albert A. Koelmans
(2020)S. Keerthanan;Chamila Jayasinghe;Jayanta Kumar Biswas;Meththika Vithanage
(2021)Studying Ecology and Evolution opens doors to various interdisciplinary fields, many of which are supported by online education pathways. For those interested in combining ecological knowledge with healthcare data, exploring best cahiim accredited him programs online can provide valuable skills in managing health information systems. This blend of ecology and health sciences is increasingly relevant in environmental health careers.
If you're aiming to transition quickly into healthcare professions related to environmental impacts on human health, accelerated nursing programs offer a practical route. Programs like absn programs with high acceptance rates make it easier for students to enter nursing fields faster, which can complement ecological expertise in clinical settings.
Certification is critical in advancing healthcare careers tied to ecology. Understanding differences between certifications, such as ccs vs cpc, helps professionals determine the best path for specialization and improved salary prospects within health informatics roles influenced by ecological data.
For those already holding a master’s degree, pursuing a post masters fnp certification can open up advanced practice opportunities in family nursing, intersecting with community health and environmental factors. This certification supports leadership roles that address ecosystem health impacts on populations.
