| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medicine | 1547 | 69 | 101 | 16 |
The discussions in Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology mainly cover the fields of Pharmacology, Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Biochemistry and Anesthesia. The work on Pharmacology tackled in Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology brings together disciplines like Oxidative stress, Toxicity and In vivo. While work presented in the journal provided substantial information on Internal medicine, it also covered topics in Gastroenterology, Diabetes mellitus and Cardiology.
Insulin is a major topic of Endocrinology research presented in it. Biochemistry, which encompasses Antioxidant and Glutathione, is the main subject of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology.
The most cited papers mostly deal with topics like Pharmacology, Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Biochemistry and Antioxidant. The featured Pharmacology studies in the published articles mainly concentrate on Apoptosis but also cover areas of interest in Cancer research. The journal articles feature Internal medicine research that overlaps with concepts in Gastroenterology.
Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology primarily tackles Internal medicine, 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak, Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), Pharmacology and Endocrinology. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology facilitates discussions on Internal medicine that incorporate concepts from other fields like Gastroenterology and Cardiology. The presented 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak research focuses mostly on Control (management) and, on occasion, topics in Medical education.
The studies on Pharmacology discussed can also contribute to research in the domains of In vitro, Toxicity and In vivo. Studies on Endocrinology discussed in Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology link to the field of Inflammation. Pharmacodynamics is a primary topic of Pharmacokinetics research in Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 28.72% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 25.18% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 8.63% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 7.19% of all publications and 58.99% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Peter Breining;Anne Lier Frølund;Jesper Falkesgaard Højen;Jesper Damsgaard Gunst;Jesper Damsgaard Gunst
(2021)Milad Ashrafizadeh;Zahra Ahmadi;Reza Mohammadinejad;Nasim Kaviyani
(2020)Hiroaki Shimokawa;Shigeo Godo
(2020)Dahui Li;Wai Yan Sun;Bowen Fu;Aimin Xu
(2020)Keivan Golshiri;Ehsan Ataei Ataabadi;Eliana C. Portilla Fernandez;A. H. Jan Danser
(2020)Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg;Volker M Lauschke
(2021)Katrina M Mirabito Colafella;Katrina M Mirabito Colafella;Rugina I Neuman;Willy Visser;A H Jan Danser
(2020)Eric D Eisenmann;Zahra Talebi;Alex Sparreboom;Sharyn D Baker
(2021)Benjamin Daniels;Sallie‐Anne Pearson;Claire M. Vajdic;Anton Pottegård
(2020)For those interested in the healthcare field beyond traditional medical school, numerous related online degrees can provide valuable career pathways. Pursuing an online biology degree is an excellent foundation for students who want a flexible yet rigorous science education that supports various health professions.
Students looking to enter the healthcare workforce more quickly might consider medical assistant programs. Many options offer financial support, with useful information available regarding financial aid for medical assistant programs. These programs can open doors to entry-level medical jobs and essential clinical experience.
For those aiming to advance their qualifications, ma to lpn bridge programs online provide a streamlined path to Licensed Practical Nurse credentials while building on medical assistant training. Such bridge programs expand career options and earning potential within nursing.
Additionally, nutrition and dietetics offer vital roles in healthcare teams. Exploring the best dietetics programs can guide students toward specialized expertise that complements medical knowledge and promotes patient wellness.