| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Immunology | 172 | 27 | 28 | 9 |
| Medicine | 2608 | 19 | 21 | 9 |
The journal primarily focuses on research topics in Immunology, Internal medicine, Autoimmunity, Autoantibody and Antibody. It concentrates on Immunology topics that focus on Autoimmune disease, Immune system, Antigen, Pathogenesis and T cell. Lupus erythematosus and Immunopathology are some topics wherein Autoimmune disease research discussed in Autoimmunity have an impact.
Many of the studies tackled connect Immune system with a similar field of study like Inflammation. The studies in T cell featured incorporate elements of Cytotoxic T cell and T lymphocyte. While Internal medicine is the key highlight in Autoimmunity, it also covered some subjects on Endocrinology and Receptor.
It explores the study of Autoimmunity to improve our understanding of the broader topic of Disease. The study on Autoantibody presented is investigated in conjunction with research in Pathology. Autoimmunity explores issues in Antibody which can be linked to other research areas like Molecular biology and Virology.
The published papers are mainly concerned with subjects like Immunology, Autoimmunity, Autoimmune disease, Autoantibody and Immune system. The published papers explore research in Immunology and the adjacent study of Internal medicine. The most cited publications explore research in Antigen and overlapping concepts in Molecular biology to expand the discourse in Autoantibody.
The objective of the journal is to combine knowledge in the areas of Cancer research, Apoptosis, Inflammation, Immunology and Cell growth. Issues in Cancer research were discussed, taking into consideration concepts from other disciplines like Gene knockdown, Immune system, microRNA, Rheumatoid arthritis and Biomarker (medicine). Topics in Apoptosis were tackled in line with various other fields like Flow cytometry, Cell, Western blot and Cell biology.
It explores issues in Immunology which can be linked to other research areas like Polymorphism (computer science) and Genotype. While the primary focus in the journal is Autoimmunity, it also dissects topics surrounding Fibrosis and Gene as a whole. The presented studies in Autoantibody and Autoimmune antibody fall within the purview of Antibody but it also intertwines with topics in Diagnostic test.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Autoimmunity (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Autoimmunity (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 15.52% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 0.00% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 2.04% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 4.08% of all publications and 93.88% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Lian Zhang;Haijing Wu;Ming Zhao;Qianjin Lu
(2020)Lichchavi D. Rajasinghe;Quan Zhen Li;Chengsong Zhu;Mei Yan
(2020)Yu Feng;Ming Yang;Haijing Wu;Qianjin Lu
(2020)Carolina Hurtado;Liliana Yazmín Acevedo Sáenz;Elsa María Vásquez Trespalacios;Rodrigo Urrego
(2020)Wynand Alkema;Hans Koenen;Brigit E Kersten;Charlotte Kaffa
(2021)Yongjian Chen;Ming Yang;Di Long;Qianwen Li
(2020)For those interested in medicine and healthcare, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career opportunities beyond traditional medical practice. Programs like the number of cahme accredited mha programs offer management education aimed at preparing leaders in healthcare administration. These programs emphasize strategic skills necessary for running healthcare organizations effectively.
Advanced clinical degrees have also evolved with flexible options. For example, many professionals seek a dnp online no clinicals program to enhance their clinical expertise without the traditional onsite clinical requirements, catering to busy schedules or those working in non-clinical roles.
Alternatively, healthcare management-focused individuals might consider a doctorate in healthcare administration online. This degree builds advanced leadership, policy, and management capabilities, a strong fit for those targeting executive positions in the healthcare sector.
Pharmacy is another key pillar, with rising demand for professionals. The availability of online pharmacy programs allows students to pursue advanced pharmaceutical education remotely, balancing their studies with professional commitments.
These pathways illustrate how healthcare education is adapting to meet various career goals, offering flexible and accredited programs tailored to evolving professional needs.
