| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences and Humanities | 1307 | 14 | 18 | 2 |
The foci of The American Historical Review are Ancient history, Economic history, Classics, Theology and Art history. The works on Ancient history deal in particular with Empire. Economic history research featured in the journal incorporates concerns from various other topics such as Political economy and Politics.
The work tackled in The American Historical Review goes beyond the discipline of Theology as it also encompasses Religious studies.
The most cited articles primarily tackle Ancient history, Politics, Law, Classics and Economic history. While Politics is the focus of the published papers, it also provides insights into the studies of Social science and Gender studies.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in The American Historical Review (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in The American Historical Review (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 8.26% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 6.67% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 6.00% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 12.67% of all publications and 74.67% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
An invaluable aspect of understanding the output of The American Historical Review is to analyze the research methodologies employed in the journal. By doing so, readers and would-be contributors gain insight into the preferred techniques and approaches typically used within the research community of this notable historical review. In most studies published by The American Historical Review, a common blend of qualitative and quantitative research methods is employed. These methods typically include analyzing historical documents, exploring archival data, and, in some cases, employing statistical analysis. Historical analysis remains a dominant method utilized in this journal. This methodology heavily relies on the examination of primary and secondary sources such as letters, diaries, administrative records, works of art, and previous historical research. Equally important is comparative historical analysis, often used in studies pertaining to political, economic, and social revolutions. This method aids researchers in distinguishing unique patterns and trends across different historical events, cultures, or societies. Ethnographic methods also emerge within some areas of focus in the journal, particularly in articles focused on more recent history, religious studies, and gender studies. Researchers spend extensive time in the field speaking with subjects and gathering information from the ground level. In addition to these traditional methods, more modern forms of research such as digital humanities research are gaining traction in the field. This involves the application of digital tools and methods to aid in the analysis and presentation of historical data. For readers seeking more in-depth understanding of these methodologies, especially students aspiring for a career in history or similar fields, comprehensive resources are available. An example is for those exploring how to become a Marriage counselor education requirements in Utah, which provides a thorough breakdown of research methods in that field. By understanding and mastering these methodologies, researchers can enhance their interpretive skills and effectively contribute to the enriching diversity of studies featured in The American Historical Review.
Antoinette Burton
(2021)David J. Silverman
(2020)Helen Cowie
(2021)Sander L. Gilman
(2021)Antoinette Burton
(2020)David J. Silverman
(2020)Pursuing a career in Social Sciences and Humanities offers diverse opportunities for meaningful impact. Many students explore flexible learning options like the mlis degree, which prepares graduates for roles in information management, archives, and library sciences. This degree balances research skills and digital literacy to meet modern information needs.
For those interested in therapeutic and creative outlets, art therapy graduate programs provide strong interdisciplinary training. Graduates can pursue careers that blend psychology and art, supporting mental health and wellness through innovative treatment approaches.
Social work remains a vital field for social change, with numerous best online social work programs offering advanced courses. These programs prepare students to effectively advocate for individuals and communities, addressing social justice and welfare.
Lastly, the health sector benefits from professionals trained through health and human services degree programs. These concise programs equip students with essential skills to support human well-being across various healthcare settings.
