IEEE International Conference on Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing (UIC)

This page presents a comprehensive ranking of scientific conferences in the field of Computer Science, meticulously compiled by Research.com—one of the foremost platforms dedicated to science research across all major fields. Since 2014, Research.com has been recognized for providing trusted data and insights on scientific contributions, with an ongoing commitment to promoting excellence and transparency in academic research evaluation.

The ranking is based on a proprietary bibliometric score, uniquely developed by Research.com to measure the impact and influence of each conference. This score integrates the estimated h-index, a well-established metric for evaluating scientific impact, along with the number of leading scientists who have participated in the conferences over the last three years. Such an approach ensures a multi-faceted and meaningful assessment of the conferences' scholarly relevance and prestige.

Impact Score values used for this edition of the ranking were collected on 2024-11-27, reflecting the most up-to-date and comprehensive data available. The ranking process involved an exhaustive analysis of over 2,742 conferences, meticulously selected after the detailed review and rigorous examination of more than 148,739 scientific documents published within the past three years. This evaluation incorporated the contributions of 13,184 leading and well-respected scientists specializing in Computer Science.

To ensure complete transparency and to foster confidence in our methodology, we invite readers to explore an in-depth explanation of the conference ranking criteria and calculation methods on our Methodology Page.

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each conference is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing at Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing (based on the number of publications) are:

• Zhiwen Yu (17 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition,
• Bin Guo (16 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition,
• Jianhua Ma (15 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• Runhe Huang (14 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition,
• Daqing Zhang (11 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing at Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing (based on the number of publications) are:

• Beihang University (26 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition,
• University of Science and Technology Beijing (25 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• Tsinghua University (21 papers) published 6 papers at the last edition,
• IBM (21 papers) published 17 papers at the last edition, 16 more than at the previous edition,
• Hosei University (21 papers) published 4 papers at the last edition, 3 more than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions at the conference edition to all articles published within that conference. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the conference.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2017 edition, 4.24% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 18.08% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing at the conference. Another 11.07% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 14.76% of all publications and 56.09% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of conferences they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same conference from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the conference in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing at a conference. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a conference, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.