World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
William E. Weihl

William E. Weihl

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
46
Citations
9854
World Ranking
6786
National Ranking
2987

William E. Weihl publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William E. Weihl sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 92 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

William E. Weihl D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William E. Weihl sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

William E. Weihl is affiliated with ClimateVoice in the United States. Their work is connected to climate-related initiatives, reflecting a focus aligned with environmental advocacy or policy engagement through this organization.

No specific recent papers, coauthors, or publication venues have been documented, indicating either a limited publication record or involvement in non-academic roles within their professional activities. Likewise, there are no recorded book publications or detailed data on scientific fields or subfields of study associated with their name.

Due to the absence of detailed research outputs or thematic classifications, no distinct main topics of work or academic contributions are listed. This limits the ability to outline research trajectories or subject specializations typically available for scientists with an extensive publication history.

No awards or distinctions have been reported, leaving the professional recognition status within the scientific community unspecified. There is also no information regarding the scientist's date of death; therefore, they are listed as living.

The profile of William E. Weihl primarily reflects their association with ClimateVoice, an organization engaged in climate-related activities. This suggests their professional orientation might be more focused on practical or advocacy-driven efforts rather than traditional academic research outputs.

Best Publications

  • Lottery scheduling: flexible proportional-share resource management

    Carl A. Waldspurger;William E. Weihl

  • Globally distributed content delivery

    J. Dilley;B. Maggs;J. Parikh;H. Prokop

  • Reaching approximate agreement in the presence of faults

    Danny Dolev;Nancy A. Lynch;Shlomit S. Pinter;Eugene W. Stark

  • Continuous profiling: where have all the cycles gone?

    Jennifer M. Anderson;Lance M. Berc;Jeffrey Dean;Sanjay Ghemawat

  • Commutativity-based concurrency control for abstract data types

    W.E. Weihl

  • PROTEUS: a high-performance parallel-architecture simulator

    Eric A. Brewer;Chrysanthos N. Dellarocas;Adrian Colbrook;William E. Weihl

  • ProfileMe: hardware support for instruction-level profiling on out-of-order processors

    Jeffrey Dean;James E. Hicks;Carl A. Waldspurger;William E. Weihl

  • Lottery and stride scheduling: flexible proportional-share resource management

    Carl A. Waldspurger;William E. Weihl

  • Local atomicity properties: modular concurrency control for abstract data types

    W. E. Weihl

  • Method for scheduling threads in a multithreaded processor

    George Z. Chrysos;Jeffrey A. Dean;James E. Hicks;Carl A. Waldspurger

  • Method for analyzing computer performance data

    Monika H. Henzinger;Shun-Tak Albert Leung;Richard L. Sites;Mark T. Vandevoorde

  • Dynamic Coscheduling on Workstation Clusters

    Patrick Sobalvarro;Scott Pakin;William E. Weihl;Andrew A. Chien

  • Implementation of resilient, atomic data types

    William Weihl;Barbara Liskov

  • Interprocedural data flow analysis in the presence of pointers, procedure variables, and label variables

    Unknown

  • Hybrid concurrency control for abstract data types

    Maurice P. Herlihy;William E. Weihl

  • Demand-based coscheduling of parallel jobs on multiprogrammed multiprocessors

    Patrick Gregory Sobalvarro;William E. Weihl

  • Edgecomputing: extending enterprise applications to the edge of the internet

    Unknown

  • Register relocation: flexible contexts for multithreading

    Carl A. Waldspurger;William E. Weihl

  • SPECIFICATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ATOMIC DATA TYPES

    W. E. Weihl

  • Device and method for highly frequency sampling for performance counter

    Lance M Berc;Sanjay Ghemawat;Monika H Henzinger;Richard L Sites

  • Method for estimating statistics of properties of instructions processed by a processor pipeline

    George Z. Chrysos;Jeffrey A. Dean;James E. Hicks;Carl A. Waldspurger

  • DEVICE FOR SAMPLING INSTRUCTION IN PROCESSOR PIPELINE AT RANDOM

    Chrysos George Z;Dean Jeffrey A;Hicks James E;Leibholz Daniel L

Frequent Co-Authors

Carl A. Waldspurger
Carl A. Waldspurger DELL (United States)
Jeffrey Dean
Jeffrey Dean Google (United States)
James W. Hicks
James W. Hicks University of Southern California
Alan Fekete
Alan Fekete University of Sydney
Eric Brewer
Eric Brewer University of California, Berkeley
Michael Merritt
Michael Merritt AT&T (United States)
Wilson C. Hsieh
Wilson C. Hsieh Google (United States)
Chrysanthos Dellarocas
Chrysanthos Dellarocas Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to a variety of specialized online degrees and evolving career tracks. For students interested in data protection and security, cybersecurity online degrees are a popular and growing choice. These programs focus on digital safety, data privacy, and protecting organizations from cyber threats.

Technology also plays a crucial role in other sectors. Professionals looking to blend tech skills with project management may consider the cheapest online construction management degree. This pathway integrates digital tools with real-world construction oversight, preparing graduates for diverse leadership roles.

Criminal justice is another area that intersects with technology. By pursuing a criminal justice major, students gain insights into law enforcement, justice systems, and the importance of digital evidence in solving crimes.

Additionally, those interested in finance and analytics can benefit from online accounting degree programs. These degrees prepare students for high-demand roles in auditing, taxation, and financial management, often leveraging the latest accounting software solutions.

Best Scientists Citing William E. Weihl

Recently Published Articles