World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Thomas M. Stoker

Thomas M. Stoker

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
31
Citations
7355
World Ranking
3524
National Ranking
1881

Thomas M. Stoker publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas M. Stoker sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 68 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Thomas M. Stoker D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas M. Stoker sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas M. Stoker is affiliated with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in the United States. Their academic profile does not currently list recent publications, co-authors, or frequent publication venues.

There is no available information regarding the main fields or subfields of study associated with their research, nor are there details on specific topics they have worked on.

There are no listed book publications or awards attributed to Thomas M. Stoker.

The available data indicates that they are currently active in their professional capacity.

Best Publications

  • Semiparametric Estimation of Index Coefficients

    James L. Powell;James H. Stock;Thomas M. Stoker

  • World Carbon Dioxide Emissions: 1950–2050

    Richard Schmalensee;Thomas M. Stoker;Ruth A. Judson

  • Investigating smooth multiple regression by the method of average derivatives

    Wolfgang Härdle;Thomas M. Stoker

  • The Economics of Slums in the Developing World

    Benjamin Marx;Thomas Martin Stoker;Tavneet Suri

  • The Transcendental Logarithmic Model of Aggregate Consumer Behavior

    Dale Jorgenson;L.J. Lau;T. M. Stoker;R. L. Basmann

  • Empirical approaches to the problem of aggregation over individuals

    Thomas M. Stoker

  • Heterogeneity and aggregation

    Richard Blundell;Thomas M. Stoker

  • Household Gasoline Demand in the United States

    Richard Schmalensee;Thomas M. Stoker

  • Efficiency of weighted average derivative estimators and index models

    Whitney K. Newey;Thomas M. Stoker

  • Economic development and the structure of the demand for commercial energy

    Ruth A. Judson;Richard Schmalensee;Thomas M. Stoker

  • Goodness-of-fit tests for kernel regression with an application to option implied volatilities

    Yacine Aı̈t-Sahalia;Peter J. Bickel;Thomas M. Stoker

  • Welfare Comparison under Exact Aggregation

    Dale W. Jorgenson;Lawrence J. LAu;Thomas M. Stoker

  • Completeness, distribution restrictions and the form of aggregate functions

    Thomas M. Stoker

  • Optimal bandwidth choice for density-weighted averages☆

    James L. Powell;Thomas M. Stoker

  • Simple Tests of Distributional Effects on Macroeconomic Equations

    Unknown

  • Documenting the birth of a financial economy

    Tavneet Suri;William Jack;Thomas Martin Stoker

  • Interpreting Aggregate Wage Growth: The Role of Labor Market Participation

    Richard Blundell;Howard Reed;Thomas M. Stoker

  • ESTIMATION WITH CENSORED REGRESSORS: BASIC ISSUES*

    Roberto Rigobon;Thomas M. Stoker

  • Semiparametric estimation of weighted average derivatives

    James L. Powell;James H. Stock;Thomas M. Stoker

  • Bias from Censored Regressors

    Roberto Rigobon;Thomas M. Stoker

  • Tailor-made tests for goodness of fit to semiparametric hypotheses

    Peter J. Bickel;Ya ' acov Ritov;Thomas M. Stoker

Frequent Co-Authors

Dale W. Jorgenson
Dale W. Jorgenson Harvard University
Richard Blundell
Richard Blundell University College London
James L. Powell
James L. Powell University of California, Berkeley
Lawrence J. Lau
Lawrence J. Lau Chinese University of Hong Kong
Yacine Aït-Sahalia
Yacine Aït-Sahalia Princeton University
James H. Stock
James H. Stock Harvard University
Wolfgang Karl Härdle
Wolfgang Karl Härdle Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring professionals in Economics and Finance have many online degree options to expand expertise or switch careers quickly. Whether you aim for a leadership role or want specialized skills, flexible online programs offer pathways to suit your goals and budget.

For those seeking advanced management credentials without a high price tag, consider exploring an mba under 25k. These affordable MBA programs are ideal for balancing your education with other commitments. Accreditation is another key factor—programs like the cheapest aacsb accredited online mba ensure quality and recognition among employers.

If your interests span digital marketing, a social media marketing studies degree offers specialized skills for one of the fastest-growing business sectors. Others might pursue hospitality management as a versatile option; you can get started quickly with the best online hospitality management graduate programs.

Each online pathway provides the flexibility and targeted knowledge needed for a dynamic career in Economics, Finance, or related industries.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas M. Stoker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles