World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Thomas Laepple publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Laepple sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Thomas Laepple D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Laepple sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • A first chronology for the North Greenland Eemian Ice Drilling (NEEM) ice core

    S. O. Rasmussen;P. M. Abbott;T. Blunier;A. J. Bourne

  • Long-term winter warming trend in the Siberian Arctic during the mid- to late Holocene

    Hanno Meyer;Thomas Opel;Thomas Laepple;Alexander Yu Dereviagin

  • Ocean surface temperature variability: Large model–data differences at decadal and longer periods

    Thomas R. Laepple;Peter John Huybers

  • Position and orientation of the westerly jet determined Holocene rainfall patterns in China.

    Ulrike Herzschuh;Ulrike Herzschuh;Xianyong Cao;Xianyong Cao;Thomas Laepple;Anne Dallmeyer

  • Flat meridional temperature gradient in the early Eocene in the subsurface rather than surface ocean

    Sze Ling Ho;Sze Ling Ho;Thomas Laepple

  • Global patterns of declining temperature variability from the Last Glacial Maximum to the Holocene

    Kira Rehfeld;Kira Rehfeld;Thomas Münch;Thomas Münch;Sze Ling Ho;Sze Ling Ho;Thomas Laepple

  • A model-data comparison of the Holocene global sea surface temperature evolution

    Gerrit Lohmann;Madlene Pfeiffer;Thomas Laepple;G. Leduc

  • On the impact of impurities on the densification of polar firn

    Maria Hörhold;Thomas Laepple;Johannes Freitag;Matthias Bigler

  • Pronounced subsurface cooling of North Atlantic waters off Northwest Africa during Dansgaard–Oeschger interstadials

    Jung-Hyun Kim;Oscar E. Romero;Gerrit Lohmann;Barbara Donner

  • High-latitude obliquity as a dominant forcing in the Agulhas current system

    T. Caley;J.-H. Kim;B. Malaizé;J. Giraudeau

  • Synchronicity of Antarctic temperatures and local solar insolation on orbital timescales

    Thomas Laepple;Martin Werner;Gerrit Lohmann

  • Global and regional variability in marine surface temperatures

    Thomas R. Laepple;Peter John Huybers

  • Seasonal cycle as template for climate variability on astronomical timescales

    Thomas Laepple;Gerrit Lohmann

  • Climatic information archived in ice cores: impact of intermittency and diffusion on the recorded isotopic signal in Antarctica

    Unknown

  • Glacial legacies on interglacial vegetation at the Pliocene-Pleistocene transition in NE Asia.

    Ulrike Herzschuh;H. John B. Birks;H. John B. Birks;H. John B. Birks;Thomas Laepple;Andrei Andreev;Andrei Andreev

  • On the similarity and apparent cycles of isotopic variations in East Antarctic snow pits

    Thomas Laepple;Thomas Münch;Thomas Münch;Mathieu Casado;Maria Hoerhold

  • Archival processes of the water stable isotope signal in East Antarctic ice cores

    Mathieu Casado;Mathieu Casado;Mathieu Casado;Amaelle Landais;Ghislain Picard;Thomas Münch;Thomas Münch

  • Ice wedges as archives of winter paleoclimate: A review.

    Thomas Opel;Thomas Opel;Hanno Meyer;Sebastian Wetterich;Thomas Laepple

  • Regional climate signal vs. local noise: a two-dimensional viewof water isotopes in Antarctic firn at Kohnen Station, Dronning MaudLand

    Thomas Münch;Thomas Münch;Sepp Kipfstuhl;Johannes Freitag;Hanno Meyer

  • Impurity-controlled densification: a new model for stratified polar firn

    Johannes Freitag;Sepp Kipfstuhl;Thomas Laepple;Frank Wilhelms

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science opens doors to diverse career paths, many of which can be pursued through flexible online programs. For older adults interested in continuing education or shifting careers, the degrees for older adults highlight accessible options to enhance skills without traditional campus constraints.

Those fascinated by environmental data and information management may find a library science degree particularly relevant. This field supports research in Earth Science through efficient data organization and retrieval.

For further specialization, programs like the mlis ala accredited programs offer advanced library and information science degrees recognized for their quality and rigor.

Additionally, digital skills are increasingly important in Earth Science careers. Online creative disciplines, such as an online photography degree, can complement scientific work by enhancing the ability to document and visually communicate findings effectively.