World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
32
Citations
3279
World Ranking
3222
National Ranking
40

Sunil Joshi publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sunil Joshi sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 145 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Sunil Joshi D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sunil Joshi sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Enhancing interlaminar fracture characteristics of woven CFRP prepreg composites through CNT dispersion

    Unknown

  • Review: Filament Winding and Automated Fiber Placement with In Situ Consolidation for Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastic Polymer Composites

    Unknown

  • A numerical approach to the modeling of polymer curing in fibre-reinforced composites

    Sunil Chandrakant Joshi;X. L. Liu;Yee Cheong Lam

  • Mode I fracture toughness and fractographic investigation of carbon fibre composites with liquid Methylmethacrylate thermoplastic matrix

    Unknown

  • A review of methods for improving interlaminar interfaces and fracture toughness of laminated composites

    Unknown

  • Progressive failure analysis of 2D woven composites at the meso-micro scale

    Liang Wang;Jiayi Wu;Chuanyong Chen;Chuanxiang Zheng

  • Low-velocity impact response of carbon fibre composites with novel liquid Methylmethacrylate thermoplastic matrix

    Unknown

  • Optimizing Polymer Infusion Process for Thin Ply Textile Composites with Novel Matrix System

    Unknown

  • Numerical Simulation of the Mould-filling Process in Resin-Transfer Moulding

    Yee Cheong Lam;Sunil Chandrakant Joshi;X. L. Liu

  • Enhanced vibration damping and dynamic mechanical characteristics of composites with novel pseudo-thermoset matrix system

    Unknown

  • Multiscale Polymer Composites: A Review of the Interlaminar Fracture Toughness Improvement

    Unknown

  • Curing optimization for pultruded composite sections

    Jianhua Li;Sunil C. Joshi;Y.C. Lam

  • Improved cure optimization in pultrusion with pre-heating and die-cooler temperature

    Sunil C. Joshi;Y.C. Lam;U. Win Tun

  • Three-dimensional finite-element/nodal-control-volume simulation of the pultrusion process with temperature-dependent material properties including resin shrinkage

    Sunil Chandrakant Joshi;Yee Cheong Lam

  • Damping, impact and flexural performance of novel carbon/Elium® thermoplastic tubular composites

    Somen K. Bhudolia;Goram Gohel;Kah Fai Leong;Sunil C. Joshi

  • Mass conservation in numerical simulation of resin flow

    Sunil Joshi;Yee C Lam;X L Liu

  • Integrated approach for modelling cure and crystallization kinetics of different polymers in 3D pultrusion simulation

    Sunil C. Joshi;Y.C. Lam

  • Impact behavior and damage characteristics of hygrothermally conditioned carbon epoxy composite laminates

    Unknown

  • Effects of salts in the Hofmeister series and solvent isotopes on the gelation mechanisms for hydroxypropylmethylcellulose hydrogels

    S. Q. Liu;Sunil C. Joshi;Y. C. Lam

  • Microwave–thermal technique for energy and time efficient curing of carbon fiber reinforced polymer prepreg composites

    Unknown

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, exploring related online degrees can be a strategic move. Programs such as the fastest online masters in applied behavior analysis offer accelerated education options that combine technical understanding with behavioral science, broadening career possibilities in engineering management and human factors.

Pursuing careers in specialized fields like speech-language pathology also presents unique challenges and opportunities. Understanding how hard is it to get into slp grad school is essential for engineering graduates considering a pivot or dual expertise in communication disorders, especially given the interdisciplinary demand in healthcare technology.

For students seeking more accessible entry points, reviewing the easiest slp masters programs to get into can provide motivation and a strategic pathway towards certification and practice, which may complement aerospace or mechanical engineering skills in roles involving assistive technologies.

Cost is always a significant factor when choosing a program. Investigating speech pathology degree online cost helps prospective students budget effectively and compare education investments relative to career outcomes in related fields.