World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 60 9521 8620 2670 2197 149 24548

Suljo Linic publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Suljo Linic between 2002 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Suljo Linic published across 25 years, from 2002 to 2026, averaging 6.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2008. 9 of the 162 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2008. 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 8 publications 2026: 1 publication
2002 2026

162 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Suljo Linic: publications per year, 2002 to 2026
Year Publications
2002 2
2003 2
2004 5
2005 3
2006 7
2007 8
2008 16
2009 9
2010 8
2011 13
2012 6
2013 6
2014 7
2015 3
2016 9
2017 6
2018 11
2019 5
2020 4
2021 8
2022 5
2023 4
2024 6
2025 8
2026 1
Total 162
Download as CSV

Suljo Linic publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Suljo Linic sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 149 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218 149
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Suljo Linic D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Suljo Linic sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882 60
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Suljo Linic is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on materials science and energy, with significant contributions to the fields of materials chemistry, renewable energy, sustainability, and catalysis.

The scientist's recent publications span high-impact journals and cover topics related to catalysis, machine learning applications in materials science, and energy conversion processes. Notable papers include:

  • Stable and selective catalysts for propane dehydrogenation operating at thermodynamic limit (2021, Science)
  • Flow and extraction of energy and charge carriers in hybrid plasmonic nanostructures (2021, Nature Materials)
  • Interpretable machine learning for knowledge generation in heterogeneous catalysis (2022, Nature Catalysis)
  • Design Principles for Efficient and Stable Water Splitting Photoelectrocatalysts (2021, Accounts of Chemical Research)
  • Theory-Guided Machine Learning Finds Geometric Structure-Property Relationships for Chemisorption on Subsurface Alloys (2020, Chem)

The scientist collaborates frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Bryan R. Goldsmith
  • Aarti Mathur
  • James Wortman
  • Jacques A. Esterhuizen
  • John Hemmerling

They have published extensively across various high-profile venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of the American Chemical Society
  • ACS Catalysis
  • Science
  • Nature Materials
  • Nature Catalysis

Their main research areas include materials science and energy, with subfields focusing on materials chemistry, renewable energy, sustainability, electrical and electronic engineering, catalysis, and biomedical engineering.

Key topics of their work encompass:

  • Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
  • Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions
  • Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications
  • Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research
  • Semiconductor materials and devices

Best Publications

  • Plasmonic-metal nanostructures for efficient conversion of solar to chemical energy

    Suljo Linic;Phillip Christopher;David B. Ingram

  • Visible-light-enhanced catalytic oxidation reactions on plasmonic silver nanostructures

    Phillip Christopher;Hongliang Xin;Suljo Linic

  • Photochemical transformations on plasmonic metal nanoparticles

    Suljo Linic;Umar Aslam;Calvin Boerigter;Matthew Morabito

  • Water Splitting on Composite Plasmonic-Metal/Semiconductor Photoelectrodes: Evidence for Selective Plasmon-Induced Formation of Charge Carriers near the Semiconductor Surface

    David B. Ingram;Suljo Linic

  • Singular characteristics and unique chemical bond activation mechanisms of photocatalytic reactions on plasmonic nanostructures

    Phillip Christopher;Hongliang Xin;Andiappan Marimuthu;Suljo Linic

  • Catalytic conversion of solar to chemical energy on plasmonic metal nanostructures

    Umar Aslam;Vishal Govind Rao;Steven Chavez;Suljo Linic

  • Tuning Selectivity in Propylene Epoxidation by Plasmon Mediated Photo-Switching of Cu Oxidation State

    Andiappan Marimuthu;Jianwen Zhang;Suljo Linic

  • Evidence and implications of direct charge excitation as the dominant mechanism in plasmon-mediated photocatalysis.

    Calvin Boerigter;Robert Campana;Matthew Morabito;Suljo Linic

  • Controlling energy flow in multimetallic nanostructures for plasmonic catalysis

    Umar Aslam;Steven Chavez;Suljo Linic

  • High-performance Ag-Co Alloy Catalysts for Electrochemical Oxygen Reduction

    Adam Holewinski;Juan Carlos Idrobo;Suljo Linic

  • Mechanism of Charge Transfer from Plasmonic Nanostructures to Chemically Attached Materials

    Calvin Boerigter;Umar Aslam;Suljo Linic

  • Elementary mechanisms in electrocatalysis: Revisiting the ORR tafel slope

    Adam Holewinski;Suljo Linic

  • Enhancing Photochemical Activity of Semiconductor Nanoparticles with Optically Active Ag Nanostructures: Photochemistry Mediated by Ag Surface Plasmons

    Phillip Christopher;David B. Ingram;Suljo Linic

  • Stable and selective catalysts for propane dehydrogenation operating at thermodynamic limit

    Ali Hussain Motagamwala;Rawan Almallahi;James Wortman;Valentina Omoze Igenegbai

  • Engineering Selectivity in Heterogeneous Catalysis: Ag Nanowires as Selective Ethylene Epoxidation Catalysts

    Phillip Christopher;Suljo Linic

  • Predictive Model for the Design of Plasmonic Metal/Semiconductor Composite Photocatalysts

    David B. Ingram;Phillip Christopher;Jonathan L. Bauer;Suljo Linic

  • Flow and extraction of energy and charge carriers in hybrid plasmonic nanostructures.

    Suljo Linic;Steven Chavez;Rachel Elias

  • High Activity Carbide Supported Catalysts for Water Gas Shift

    Neil M. Schweitzer;Joshua A. Schaidle;Obiefune K. Ezekoye;Xiaoqing Pan

  • Catalytic and photocatalytic transformations on metal nanoparticles with targeted geometric and plasmonic properties.

    Suljo Linic;Phillip Christopher;Phillip Christopher;Hongliang Xin;Andiappan Marimuthu

  • Promotion of the long-term stability of reforming Ni catalysts by surface alloying

    Eranda Nikolla;Johannes Schwank;Suljo Linic

  • Formation of a stable surface oxametallacycle that produces ethylene oxide.

    Suljo Linic;Mark A. Barteau

  • Control of ethylene epoxidation selectivity by surface oxametallacycles.

    Suljo Linic;Mark A. Barteau

Frequent Co-Authors

Phillip Christopher
Phillip Christopher University of California, Santa Barbara
Mark A. Barteau
Mark A. Barteau University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Johannes Schwank
Johannes Schwank University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Phillip E. Savage
Phillip E. Savage Pennsylvania State University
Paolo Fornasiero
Paolo Fornasiero University of Trieste
Takashi Ooi
Takashi Ooi Nagoya University
Levi T. Thompson
Levi T. Thompson University of Delaware
Huimin Zhao
Huimin Zhao University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Juan Carlos Idrobo
Juan Carlos Idrobo University of Washington
Vojislav R. Stamenkovic
Vojislav R. Stamenkovic University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Chemistry degree in the USA opens doors to various specialized fields, including forensic science and related careers. For those interested in applying chemical knowledge to criminal investigations, exploring best online colleges for forensic science can offer valuable education pathways that blend science with law enforcement.

Career options in this area are diverse. For example, becoming an autopsy tech requires a strong foundation in biological and chemical sciences, along with specialized training — detailed insights on becoming an autopsy tech highlight the necessary steps, salary expectations, and job outlook.

Advanced degrees can further broaden opportunities. Many professionals pursue an online masters degree in forensic psychology to deepen their understanding of the psychological factors behind crime, complementing their scientific background.

For an overview of the expanding professional landscape, reviewing a variety of forensic careers helps students and graduates identify fitting roles, from crime lab analysts to forensic consultants. Together, these pathways illustrate the practical ways a Chemistry education can lead to impactful, rewarding forensic science careers.

Best Scientists Citing Suljo Linic

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles