World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 66 7401 6707 2184 1804 235 13590

Stephen M. Rappaport publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stephen M. Rappaport between 1975 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stephen M. Rappaport published across 51 years, from 1975 to 2025, averaging 8.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 54 publications in 2023. 39 of the 426 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 54. Peak 54 publications in 2023. 1975: 1 publication 1976: 3 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 3 publications 1979: 4 publications 1980: 4 publications 1981: 7 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 4 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 12 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 54 publications 2024: 29 publications 2025: 10 publications
1975 2025

426 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stephen M. Rappaport: publications per year, 1975 to 2025
Year Publications
1975 1
1976 3
1977 1
1978 3
1979 4
1980 4
1981 7
1982 5
1983 1
1984 4
1985 1
1986 0
1987 3
1988 5
1989 2
1990 7
1991 6
1992 2
1993 9
1994 5
1995 5
1996 7
1997 11
1998 12
1999 10
2000 3
2001 12
2002 9
2003 10
2004 15
2005 15
2006 12
2007 6
2008 8
2009 10
2010 14
2011 15
2012 11
2013 10
2014 11
2015 7
2016 7
2017 7
2018 10
2019 6
2020 9
2021 6
2022 2
2023 54
2024 29
2025 10
Total 426
Download as CSV

Stephen M. Rappaport publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen M. Rappaport sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 221–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 235 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216 235
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Stephen M. Rappaport D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen M. Rappaport sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66–67 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775 66
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Stephen M. Rappaport is affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley, in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines with a focus on the exposome and its relationship to health, environment, and disease.

Their recent publications include:

  • Defining the Scope of Exposome Studies and Research Needs from a Multidisciplinary Perspective, 2021, Environmental Science & Technology Letters
  • The exposome - a new approach for risk assessment, 2020, ALTEX
  • The role of gene-environment interactions in lung disease: the urgent need for the exposome, 2020, European Respiratory Journal
  • Utilizing a Biology-Driven Approach to Map the Exposome in Health and Disease: An Essential Investment to Drive the Next Generation of Environmental Discovery, 2021, Environmental Health Perspectives
  • Metabolome-wide association study of occupational exposure to benzene, 2021, Carcinogenesis

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Stephen M. Rappaport include:

  • Roel Vermeulen
  • Luoping Zhang
  • Qing Lan
  • Hasmik Grigoryan
  • Lawrence L. Kupper

The most common venues for their publications are:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
  • Acta Scientifci Nutritional Health
  • Cancer Studies and Therapeutics
  • Environmental Science & Technology Letters

Their work contributes to a range of subfields, including:

  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Molecular Biology
  • Cancer Research
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Spectroscopy

Key topics frequently addressed in their research are:

  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Delphi Technique in Research
  • Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Best Publications

  • Hematotoxicity in Workers Exposed to Low Levels of Benzene

    Qing Lan;Luoping Zhang;Guilan Li;Roel Vermeulen

  • The food metabolome: a window over dietary exposure

    Augustin Scalbert;Lorraine Brennan;Claudine Manach;Cristina Andres-Lacueva

  • Implications of the exposome for exposure science.

    Stephen M Rappaport

  • A comprehensive evaluation of within- and between-worker components of occupational exposure to chemical agents.

    Hans Kromhout;Elaine Symanski;Stephen M. Rappaport

  • The blood exposome and its role in discovering causes of disease.

    Stephen M. Rappaport;Dinesh K. Barupal;David Wishart;Paolo Vineis

  • T3DB: the toxic exposome database

    David S. Wishart;David Arndt;Allison Pon;Tanvir Sajed

  • Occupational Exposure to Formaldehyde, Hematotoxicity, and Leukemia-Specific Chromosome Changes in Cultured Myeloid Progenitor Cells

    Luoping Zhang;Xiaojiang Tang;Nathaniel Rothman;Roel Vermeulen

  • Direct-acting mutagens in automobile exhaust*

    Yi Y. Wang;Stephen M. Rappaport;Robert F. Sawyer;Ronald E. Talcott

  • Adductomics: characterizing exposures to reactive electrophiles.

    Stephen M. Rappaport;He Li;Hasmik Grigoryan;William E. Funk

  • Hematological changes among Chinese workers with a broad range of benzene exposures.

    Qingshan Qu;Roy Shore;Guilan Li;Ximei Jin

  • Isolation and identification of mutagenic nitro-pah in diesel-exhaust particulates

    X.B. Xu;Joseph P. Nachtman;Z.L. Jin;E.T. Wei

  • Using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to quantify monohydroxylated metabolites of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urine.

    Frank Onyemauwa;Stephen M. Rappaport;Jon R. Sobus;Dagmar Gajdošová

  • Modeling Human Metabolism of Benzene Following Occupational and Environmental Exposures

    Sungkyoon Kim;Roel Vermeulen;Suramya Waidyanatha;Brent A. Johnson

  • Systems biology of human benzene exposure.

    Luoping Zhang;Cliona M. McHale;Nathaniel Rothman;Guilan Li

  • Benzene, the exposome and future investigations of leukemia etiology.

    Martyn T. Smith;Luoping Zhang;Cliona M. McHale;Christine F. Skibola

  • Using urinary biomarkers to elucidate dose-related patterns of human benzene metabolism

    Sungkyoon Kim;Roel Vermeulen;Suramya Waidyanatha;Brent A. Johnson

  • Biomarkers intersect with the exposome.

    Stephen M. Rappaport

  • Rapid determination of six urinary benzene metabolites in occupationally exposed and unexposed subjects.

    Suramya Waidyanatha;Nathaniel Rothman;Guilan Li;Martyn T. Smith

  • Urinary benzene as a biomarker of exposure among occupationally exposed and unexposed subjects

    Suramya Waidyanatha;Nathaniel Rothman;Silvia Fustinoni;Martyn T. Smith

  • Defining the Scope of Exposome Studies and Research Needs from a Multidisciplinary Perspective.

    Pei Zhang;Pei Zhang;Pei Zhang;Christopher Carlsten;Romanas Chaleckis;Romanas Chaleckis;Kati Hanhineva;Kati Hanhineva;Kati Hanhineva

  • Isolation and identification of a direct-acting mutagen in diesel-exhaust particulates.

    Stephen M. Rappaport;Y. Y. Wang;Eddie T. Wei;Robert. Sawyer

  • Evidence That Humans Metabolize Benzene via Two Pathways

    Stephen M. Rappaport;Sungkyoon Kim;Qing Lan;Roel Vermeulen

  • Simultaneous determination of urinary 1- and 2-naphthols, 3- and 9-phenanthrols, and 1-pyrenol in coke oven workers.

    Berrin Serdar;Suramya Waidyanatha;Yuxin Zheng;Stephen M. Rappaport

  • Albumin Adducts of Benzene Oxide and 1,4-Benzoquinone as Measures of Human Benzene Metabolism

    Stephen M. Rappaport;Suramya Waidyanatha;Qingshan Qu;Roy Shore

  • High-performance liquid chromatography with reductive electrochemical detection of mutagenic nitro-substituted polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in diesel exhausts

    S.M. Rappaport;Z.L. Jin;X.B. Xu

  • Estimating exposures to indoor contaminants using residential dust

    Todd Whitehead;Catherine Metayer;Patricia Buffler;Stephen M Rappaport

Frequent Co-Authors

Martyn T. Smith
Martyn T. Smith University of California, Berkeley
Luoping Zhang
Luoping Zhang University of California, Berkeley
Roel Vermeulen
Roel Vermeulen Utrecht University
Nathaniel Rothman
Nathaniel Rothman National Institutes of Health
Qing Lan
Qing Lan National Institutes of Health
Hans Kromhout
Hans Kromhout Utrecht University
Paolo Vineis
Paolo Vineis Imperial College London
Stephen J. Chanock
Stephen J. Chanock National Institutes of Health
Evan R. Williams
Evan R. Williams University of California, Berkeley
Joachim D. Pleil
Joachim D. Pleil University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities beyond traditional lab roles. Many students explore specialized fields such as pharmaceutical sales, healthcare, and forensic science. For those interested in starting with a foundational qualification, a paralegal associate degree can provide essential skills that complement scientific knowledge in legal and regulatory environments.

Pharmaceutical sales is another dynamic field where a strong chemistry background is valuable. Understanding how to become a pharmaceutical sales rep helps students adapt their communication and scientific expertise to promote medications effectively.

For those aiming to advance further in healthcare, becoming a pharmacist is a rewarding option. Exploring the pharmacist salary and career requirements ensures that students have a clear understanding of this profession’s expectations and benefits.

Lastly, careers such as an autopsy technician also blend chemistry with medical sciences. Investigating autopsy technician school provides insight into the specialized education needed and the practical applications of a chemistry degree in forensic settings.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen M. Rappaport

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles